Chapter 5

Chapter 5, Socialism in Context.

What is Socialism?

Socialism is the public social organizing of the economy under the collective control of the common people in society. Socialism is the social economy put into practice which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned by the common people as a whole.
Socialism is also the economic social regulator system for the fair uses of property.


When a person speaks of Socialism, what that person typically is referring to is Proletariat Socialism.
In our time we must reach Proletariat Socialism for the World economy or face global doom.   Socialism has existed before. Proletariat Socialism is not the only manifestation of Socialism.
There is no linear continuity to map out a history of Socialism before it became self aware as the organic economy. There is no evolution to Socialism. Socialism is the natural economy of the People, it is the ethics driven economy and without it we shall parish.

Socialism is never Socialism without the practices coming from it, these two practices are, Unionism and Communitarianism.

Unionism is the use of the economic Union. The economic Union is the federated cooperative.
The federated cooperative is an autonomous association of persons united to meet their common economic, social, and cultural needs and aspirations through a jointly-owned and democratically-controlled enterprise. Unionism also means that a person merits what he or she does. Unionism in the context of Proletariat Socialism is the individual’s right to possess what he or she produced. Unionism has been a practice for Socialism long before the European usage of the word was coined.

Communitarianism is the social value that is characterized by emphasis on localized control. 
Communitarianism in correct context is not as John Goodwyn Barmby implied. John Goodwyn Barmby may have coined the term Communitarian but the word it self must be understood by its structure. Communitarianism  has been a practice for Socialism long before the European usage of the word was coined.


Socialism has existed long before the European usage of the word was coined. Socialism has been the economy of several different societies before the rise of collective consciousness for Proletariat Socialism took place within the rise of industry. It is necessary to explain historical Socialism.
From the most recent to then the most distant. 


What is Proletariat Socialism?

Proletariat Socialism is the Socialism of our time, unfortunately Proletariat Socialism has been misdirected by Communists. Proletariat Socialism is the Socialism that can only be fought for by the Proletarian. The Proletarians are thought by many to be industrial workers, but actually a Proletarian is someone exploited by Capitalism and Secularism. Marxists would not object to the statement that a Proletarian is someone exploited by Capitalism. Marxists would however object to the statement that a Proletarian is someone exploited by Secularism. It really does not matter though, Marxists have always been crippled by the language of Capitalists and this controlled thinking makes it impossible for them to reason. The Cold War was not won because America was superior in strength. The reason that Capitalism won the Cold War was because Marxism holds to ideas that Capitalists can use against them. Marxists and Anarcho Communists both reject reality not because they are delusional, on the contrary they tend to be the most intellectual of anyone else. Marxists and Anarcho Communists reject reality because they are Communists. Proletariat Socialism is the public social organizing of the economy under the collective control of the common people in society. Proletariat Socialism is the social economy put into practice which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned by the common people as a whole. Proletariat Socialism is also the economic social regulator system for the fair uses of property. Proletariat Socialism is the push for the process that will lead to Direct Democracy, this most likely can not be done without repressing the Capitalist exploiters who own everything, literally everything. I can give Marxist examples of Proletariat Socialism but I would rather give Non-Marxist examples. Part of the difficulty others find in expressing the notion of Proletariat Socialism is that others tend to limit the definition of Proletariat to Working Class People. The Proletariat might be working class in some context but usually the correct context to Proletariat is the exploited. American Protestant Whites that make up the majority of the American working class are not exploited. Indigenous People in South America are exploited by American Corporations, those South American Natives are the Proletariat. The best Non-Marxist example of Proletariat Socialism in recent time is the Bolivarian Revolution of Hugo Chávez. Hugo Chávez may still be fighting off the Spanish Bourgeoisie but he has achieved Proletariat Socialism on a local level. Marxists criticize Hugo Chávez for having a Patriotic tone to his revolution, they ignore the Patriotic tones to Fidel Castro's revolution, Marxists will ignore anything to fit their own agenda. Proletariat Socialism is the Socialism of our time. Proletariat Socialism has been abused opportunistically, mishandled, misapplied and misdirected by the Communists. Socialists who understand Proletariat Struggle will ensure the victory of Socialism not Marxists aiming for the nightmare of Communism.




What is Theocratic Socialism?

The best example of Theocratic Socialism that can be studied from an academic point of view is the Mauryu Empire. Sadly due to the eurocentricity of most Western Academic public speakers this is overlooked. The true history of the Maurya Empire is overlooked because it had a successful Socialist economy and because it showed that Western civilization has never been as good as Eastern civilization. The Maurya Empire was a geographically-extensive Iron Age historical power based in Magadha and founded by Chandragupta Maurya which dominated the Indian subcontinent between 322 and 187 BCE. Comprising the majority of South Asia, the Maurya Empire was centralized by the conquest of the Indo-Gangetic Plain, and its capital city was located at Pataliputra (modern Patna). The empire was the largest political entity to have existed in the Indian subcontinent, spanning over 5 million square kilometres (1.9 million square miles) at its zenith under Ashoka. One of the key components to the Theocratic Socialism of the Mauryu Empire was the wonderful Organized Religion of Jainism which became a vital force under the Mauryan Rule. Chandragupta and Samprati are credited for the spread of Jainism in South India. Hundreds of thousands of temples and stupas are said to have been erected during their reigns. It was the religious that made Socialism, it is still the religious that make Socialism. Theocratic Socialism is the public social organizing of the economy under the collective control of the common people in society - in the context of Theocracy. Theocratic Socialism is the social economy put into practice which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned by the common people as a whole - in the context of Theocracy. Theocracy has never ban other religions, the banning of religions has always been a secular notion. The Roman Catholic domination of Europe was not Theocracy. The Roman Catholic domination of Europe was European feudalism. It was not the religiosity of Roman Catholicism that caused this, it was illiteracy. Theocratic Socialism was never practiced in the terms of Proletariat versus Bourgeoisie. Theocratic Socialism never had to worry about Capitalism. Social equality is the foundation to every historical example of Theocratic Socialism. Theocratic Socialism has been known to exist in rebellion and not always as the authority. Christianity began as a Mystical Theocratic Socialist Rebellion against Rome.
Proletariat Socialism fights against Capitalism and Secularism.
Theocratic Socialism always fought against Empire and Polytheism. 


What is Tribal Socialism?

The best example of Tribal Socialism that can be studied from an academic point of view is the economy of the Iroquois. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels called this Primitive communism. Although I object to the term Primitive communism and find it to be of derogatory usage, it is interesting that even Marx and Engels held to this same notion of Tribal Socialism. One of the major  issues however with Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels is their consistent misuse of words. Tribal Socialism is the public social organizing of the economy under the collective control of the common people in society - in tribal context. This is the oldest version of Socialism. Understanding that Communists may actually hate this book with a deep irrational passion, I will do my best to explain what should be evident, that is I will attempt to explain the already evident reason why the economy of the Iroquois was Tribal Socialism and not the fictional primitive communism invented by Marx and Engels. Because what I shall explain is already evident, my explanation will be brief.
Tribal Socialism is tribal and this is inherently NOT COMMUNIST.
Tribal Socialism is the economy that regulates an entire group in the practice of exclusive collective kinship, this form of economy does not expand beyond the group it is intended for.
Communism is eurocentric-populist assimilation in the form of anti-sovereign economy that removes differences in culture, political opinion, ethnicity and religiosity whether people want it or not.
Marxists can not be offended by a proper definition of Communism, they can only panic because as time progresses, less and less Socialists will agree to buy into their fantasy of Communism. The tribal life of the Iroquois was obviously Socialism likewise it is obvious that the tribal life of the Iroquois was never Communism. Tribal life is in contradiction to commune life. Those who ignore the histories of Tribal Socialism loose credibility as time progresses.



Tribal Socialism, Theocratic Socialism and Proletariat Socialism all had the two practices of Unionism and Communitarianism. 

Chapter 4

Chapter 1, Culture.

I shall explain Culture in this chapter.
To avoid confusion let me clarify that I am referring to Human Culture. 
Culture is the collective social norms of a people bound together in the sharing of tradition that adapts to changes in society while simultaneously preserving the distinct characteristics which make that people unique. The word Culture is often used as an umbrella term which encompasses the social behavior, and norms found in human societies, as well as the knowledge, beliefs, arts, laws, customs, capabilities and habits of the individuals in these groups. This is not necessarily incorrect but the true emphasis on the proper definition of Culture is the distinct characteristics which make a People unique, shared values in a traditional yet adaptable set of norms for a collective is the very essence of Culture. A cultural norm codifies acceptable conduct in society; it serves as guideline for behavior, dress, language, and demeanor in a situation, which serves as a template for expectations in a social group.

A subculture is a group of people within a culture that differentiates itself from the parent culture to which it belongs, often maintaining some of its founding principles. Subcultures develop their own norms and values regarding cultural, political and sexual matters. Subcultures are part of society while keeping their specific characteristics intact. Examples of subcultures include, goths and hippies. The concept of subcultures was developed in sociology and cultural studies. However the evidence for the existence of subculture groups can be seen all over recorded history. The best example is the Jewish Culture; in the tribal period of Jewish history when the Israelite Tribes maintained the Torah Culture they remained culturally united as well as united by their collective religiosity. Within this period of Jewish history they had within their culture twelve subcultures. The Culture is believed to have split due to a political difference those tribes that stood with the party of Joseph versus those that stood with the party of Judah. Eurocentric academics tend to ignore the Jewish narrative of Jewish history; which is a mistake because there is a lot of evidence for a Tribal system that was not based in tribal chauvinism. The early Israelite history seems to have upheld a form of Tribal Socialism which seems to have been based around a strong Torah Culture and a deeply Religious Covenant. It would seem that the collapse of the Israelite tribes was due to a lack of observance of the Religious Covenant; at least according to the Jewish scriptures. There has never been given much of a convincing argument against the Jewish scriptures concerning Jewish history, only eurocentric arguments that stink of Whiteness. I will explain Tribal Socialism in the next chapter and I will give a better example of Tribal Socialism that will prove more convincing on the notion of a historic example of Tribal Socialism. The collapse of the Israelite tribes' entire saga was recorded in the Jewish scriptures, we know that all that remained of them was the tribes of Judah, Benjamin, Levi and arguably Joseph in the form of the Samaritans. We know that overtime without the Torah Culture that the Peoples of Judea and Galilee evolved into the ethnicity we call today the Palestinians. We also know that the Jewish Culture survived because of other groups taking on the Religious Covenant thus inheriting the Torah Culture. Cultures can emerge as a result of Religion. Ethnic groups can emerge as a result of Culture. Ethnic groups can also emerge as a result of Religion, for example Sephardi ethnicity is a result of Judaism which is both a cultural and religious system. The Alhambra Decree made conversion to Judaism near impossible and this is the origin of the Sephardim, before this conversion to Judaism was more common. Judaism has remained a single Culture but it has developed subcultures due to the cultural differences between Ashkenazim and Sephardim; one of these differences is only recently since the twentieth century, I am of course referring to the acceptance of bisexual wives under a Jewish patriarchal household, something more common to Sephardim before the Holocaust. After the Holocaust the Zionist regime carried out a major campaign of Cultural Genocide against several parts of Sephardi Culture including most if not all of the evidence that Tarot cards was a Sephardi invention not a Romani invention, indeed there was a time when large Sephardi populations did not see Tarot as divination, rather seeing it as connected to the Sephirot a sort of Kabbalah practice. Hermetic cults like to pretend that they were the first to connect Tarot to the Sephirot but this is not the truth, rather they simply understood that Tarot was a Sephardi concept that was intimately connected to the Sephirot.

I will go further into defining Culture by explaining Byzantine Catholic Culture.
The fall of Constantinople was in the year 1453 A.D, the dwindling Byzantine Empire came to an end when the Ottomans breached Constantinople's ancient land wall after besieging the city for 55 days.
Many individual Greek Orthodox Christians, then under Ottoman rule, embraced communion with Rome yet maintained their traditions carried over from the Greek Orthodox Church.

I will need to go on a detour here because if I don't then you will get confused:

The word Catholic (forget etymology, definition is more valid here) is a word meaning Universal Christian. Knowing this, let us understand the glaring difference between Roman Catholicism which does not constitute culture yet does constitute religion and Byzantine Catholic which constitutes culture and religion both.

The words Roman Catholic should never be thought of as Universal Christian Roman. The words Roman Catholic actually mean Old World Universal Christian. The Roman Empire was the Old World Order. The Old World refers to Africa, Asia and Europe. This is texbook, a Roman Catholic is a Old World Universal Christian.

The words Byzantine Catholic should never be thought of as Universal Christian of Byzantium. The words Byzantine Catholic must never be mistaken to mean Catholic of the Byzantine rite. The words Byzantine Catholic actually mean Greco-Roman Universal Christian. The Empire of Byzantium was the continuation of the Roman Empire in its eastern provinces during Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages, when its capital city was Constantinople (modern Istanbul, formerly Byzantium). Byzantine Catholics emerge after the fall of Constantinople. The Byzantine Catholic Nation is founded upon the oldest of Catholic religious traditions and the Greco-Roman culture that has its roots in the society of Byzantium.

The detour is over depart from it with memory of what you just learned: 

Language always has its origin in Culture. Even though language comes from Culture, a language may transcend Culture, furthermore not every Culture produces language.

To fully understand the Byzantine Catholic Culture there are three factors that must be understood in context. And before I get into that understand that the Church is not a building, Church is a word for the Body of Christ which refers to all Christians. When one hears of the separations of the Churches, one is hearing of the separations of the Body of Christ which refers to the separation of the Christians. The word for a building of worship where Church gathers for worship, liturgy, confession and duty is Parish. The word Cathedral likewise describes; building of worship where Church gathers for worship, liturgy, confession and duty yet having higher authority rank than Parish.

The first factor to grasp is language. 
The Byzantine Catholic Church utilizes several languages for the purposes of liturgy. Every divisional sector of the Byzantine Catholic Church utilizes the liturgy of the Byzantine-Greek rite.
Historically the most important non-Greek variants of Byzantine Rite are: Byzantine-Slavonic and Byzantine-Georgian. The universal language of the Byzantine Catholic Culture is Slavonic, the opposition to the recognition of this fact is higher in this Twenty-first Century than it was in the Twenty Century. Slavonic is rooted in Old Church Slavonic. The Byzantine Catholic People are loosing Slavonic as a shared common language, however its liturgical form is well preserved. The liturgical uses of the Byzantine-Greek rite, the Byzantine-Georgian rite and the Byzantine-Slavonic rite make the preservation of common Slavonic possible. There has been a war on the utilization of common Slavic among Byzantine Catholics since the revolutionary days of Vladimir Lenin. The reason why there has been a war on common Slavonic since the early Soviet days is because the Byzantine Catholics of Russia embraced Socialism that was in opposition to Communist ideology. This common people's Socialism mostly unnoticed by the Bolsheviks, it was more noticed by those loyal to the Tsarist system. Indeed the Russian Orthodox Church persecuted Byzantine Catholic Trade Unions before the Bolshevik October Revolution happened. When Vladimir Lenin took power the persecution only worsened. When the Bolsheviks attacked these Byzantine Catholic Trade Unions they did so by assimilating them into the dreadful Soviets forcing the Byzantine Catholics into silence. Byzantine Catholic Trade Unions also lacked the organization skill and cultural consciousness that the Jewish Labor Bund had. With the loss of the political literature of the Byzantine Catholics of Russia these Byzantine Catholics went underground. Then the Byzantine Catholics of the Melkite Greek Catholic Church suffered from the rising Pan-Arab Nationalism that was imposed by Western Enlightenment Values. Capitalists and Communists can claim to be archenemies all they want yet it is ironic that common Slavonic is the enemy of the Communists just as much as the Capitalists. Byzantine Catholics suffer from Cultural Genocide carried out by Western Domination something that Roman Catholics of great influence to this day mostly ignore.

The second factor to grasp is the Byzantine Catholic family connections to other Eastern Christians both those Catholic and those Orthodox. This second factor is directly connected to the first factor.
The Byzantine Catholic family connections to other Eastern Christians is held together by the five liturgical traditions of the twenty-three Eastern Catholic Churches, including the Alexandrian Rite, the Armenian Rite, the Byzantine Rite, the East Syriac Rite, and the West Syriac Rite. The Alexandrian Rite is a liturgical rite of the Byzantine Catholic Church that is also utilized by the Coptic Orthodox Church of Alexandria, Eritrean Orthodox Tewahedo Church and Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church. The Armenian Rite is a liturgical rite of the Georgian divisional sector of the Byzantine Catholic Church that is also utilized by both the Armenian Apostolic and Armenian Catholic Churches. The Byzantine Rite, also known as the Greek Rite, Byzantine-Greek rite or Constantinopolitan Rite is a liturgical rite of the Byzantine Catholic Church that is also utilized by the Eastern Orthodox Churches. The East Syriac Rite or East Syrian Rite, also called Assyrian Rite, Persian Rite, Chaldean Rite, or Syro-Oriental Rite, is a liturgical rite of the Byzantine Catholic Church that is also utilized by the Assyrian Church of the East, the Chaldean Church and the Syro-Malabar Catholic Church (it is very important to understand that both the Assyrian Christians and the Chaldean Christians constitute two Nations that are independent from the Byzantine Catholic Nation). The West Syriac Rite or West Aramean Rite, also called Syro-Antiochian Rite, is a liturgical rite of the Byzantine Catholic Church that is also utilized by the Syriac Orthodox Church and the Maronite Church. One of the biggest confusions (so confusing that even Byzantine Catholics have been known to be confused by this) is that not all Eastern Catholics can be called Byzantine Catholics yet all Byzantine Catholics indeed belong to the greater category of Eastern Catholics.

The third factor to grasp is the subcultures of the Byzantine Catholic Culture. This third factor is directly connected to the first factor and the second factor. This factor is still known but the Cultural Genocide to remove this knowledge grows very rapidly. There are six subcultures that make up the broader Byzantine Catholic Culture, they are the Melkite Byzantine Catholic subculture, the Romanian Byzantine Catholic subculture, the Slovak Byzantine Catholic subculture, the Ruthenian Byzantine Catholic subculture, the Ukrainian Byzantine Catholic subculture and the non-affiliated Byzantine Catholic subculture. Remember not to get confused, being a Catholic who practices the Byzantine rite does not qualify someone as Byzantine Catholic. However never be mistaken, the entire Byzantine Catholic Church practices the Byzantine rite.

I have decided to interrupt my self, I lack faith in the reader's ability to keep things in context. 

Do not be afraid, I do this to all of my students. If I wish to make Urban Scholars of those who read this book then I must embrace constant repetition that most find annoying.   

For further necessary repetitive clarification, never forget that not all Catholics who practice the Byzantine rite constitute themselves as being Byzantine Catholic yet every Byzantine Catholic practices the Byzantine rite. I still enchant the Beatitudes in Greek even though I am an Atheist. The capacity to utter the Beatitudes is essential to being a Christian. The Beatitudes are eight blessings recounted by Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount in the Gospel of Matthew. Each is a proverb-like proclamation, without narrative. Four of the blessings also appear in the Sermon on the Plain in the Gospel of Luke, followed by four woes which mirror the blessings. The capacity to utter the Beatitudes is worthless without knowing how to do this in the tradition of the Byzantine rite. The Byzantine rite is essential to Christianity because the Byzantine rite is the Christian rite preformed in Greek, Greek is essential to Christianity because the language of Christianity is Greek not Latin. Latin is the Roman Catholic language, not all Christians constitute themselves as being Roman Catholic. Truly even further necessary repetitive clarification is required to grasp what must follow in this chapter, the correct definition of Catholic is Universal Christian, thus the correct definition of Roman Catholic is Old World Universal Christian yet the correct definition of Byzantine Catholic is Greco-Roman Universal Christian. In case this essential information has not been properly beaten into your head, I am required to get even more redundant than before, otherwise context will get destroyed if not by Vatican oligarchic Pro-Capitalist sickos whom depend on the masses remaining ignorant, the Marxian anti-dialectical Communists whom depend on hiding the correct side of religion will surely wipe this from consciousness or attempt to twist what I have written in order to destroy context: Greek is the universal Christian language, Christianity is based on the Gospels, the earliest version of the written Gospels are in Greek, Latin is the language of the Old World Universal Christians, the Old World Universal Christians belong to a religious tradition that is not cultural, Old World Universal Christian tradition belongs to the broader category of Christianity, Greco-Roman Universal Christians constitute a Nation because they belong to a religious tradition that is cultural, the use of Greek is required by all Christians whether they are upholding this or not, the Old World Universal Christian tradition requires the use of Latin and Greek yet for virtually the entire existence of the Old World Universal Christian Church they only observed the Latin rite rejecting the Byzantine rite, the Old World Universal Christians have in recent times dropped their Latin rite as a requirement which was uniquely theirs, the Greco-Roman Universal Christians have kept the Byzantine rite knowing the importance of Greek to all manifestations of genuine authentic Christianity, the Greco-Roman Universal Christians are not and must never be required to use the Latin rite, the language of the Greco-Roman Universal Christians is Slavonic which is almost dead in its common form yet still exists in the style of the Byzantine-Slavonic rite, the Byzantine rite is Greek in its dominate form but it also comes in at least two subscript forms known as the Byzantine-Slavonic rite and the Byzantine-Georgian rite, the Culture of the Greco-Roman Universal Christians can be divided into six subcultures, the six subcultures of the Greco-Roman Universal Christians share certain traditions with other Eastern Christians, some of these Eastern Christians that share certain traditions with Greco-Roman Universal Christians must be categorized as belonging to Orthodox Christianity, some of these Eastern Christians that share certain traditions with Greco-Roman Universal Christians must be categorized as belonging to Universal Christianity which is not that of the Greco-Roman cultural tradition nor that of the Old World tradition. 

If you understood all of that you are now worthy to read further.

The Melkite Byzantine Catholic subculture has its tradition in the Melkite Greek Catholic Church. The Melkite Byzantine Catholic subculture traces its history to the early Christians of Antioch, formerly part of Syria and now in Turkey, of the First century AD, where Christianity was introduced by Saint Peter. The Melkite Greek Catholic Church is directly related to the Greek Orthodox Church of Antioch. The Romanian Byzantine Catholic subculture has its tradition in the Romanian Greek Catholic Church. The Romanian Greek Catholic Church is part of the Major Archiepiscopal Churches of the Catholic Church that are not distinguished with a patriarchal title. The Romanian Greek Catholic Church shares much of its traditions with that of the Romanian Orthodox Church. The Slovak Byzantine Catholic subculture has its tradition in the Slovak Byzantine Catholic Church. The Slovak Byzantine Catholic subculture is known by many for sharing some of its more important traditions with the Orthodox Church of the Czech Lands and Slovakia, however the history of the Slovak Byzantine Catholic Church is much more deeply intertwined with that of the Byzantine Ruthenian Greek Catholic Church. The Ruthenian Byzantine Catholic subculture has its tradition in the Byzantine Ruthenian Greek Catholic Church. The Byzantine Ruthenian Greek Catholic Church is probably the most culturally aware of the Byzantine Catholic Churches, the use of the Byzantine rite in this Church is known to make people feel like Angels are enchanting with those in any of their Parishes and Cathedrals. The Ruthenian Byzantine Catholic subculture has the strongest connection to the Greek Orthodox Church in comparison to the other Byzantine Catholic subcultures.
The Ukrainian Byzantine Catholic subculture has its tradition in the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church. The Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church shares an almost identical use of language with the Orthodox Church of Ukraine. I have known several members of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church to speak perfect Slavonic, these Byzantine Catholics are so well spoken in Church Slavonic that I was able to converse with several of them in common Slavonic, their aid in restoring Slavonic as the universal language of the Byzantine Catholics will be vital. The non-affiliated Byzantine Catholic subculture has its tradition in Byzantine Catholic Nationality rather than in any of the Byzantine Catholic Churches. I am non-affiliated Byzantine Catholic, most of us who are non-affiliated Byzantine Catholics tend to join in the communities of the Ruthenian Byzantine Catholics or in the communities of the Ukrainian Byzantine Catholics, for me though it is mostly that of the Ruthenian Byzantine Catholics. It is cultural awareness of the Ruthenian Byzantine Catholics that makes me more comfortable to talk more openly and directly about our Byzantine Catholic Nationality. It can be quite difficult talking to Ukrainian Byzantine Catholics about our shared Byzantine Catholic Nationality, I make no generalization, not every Ukrainian Byzantine Catholic I have known is part of the problem I am about to reference. However this problem is common within the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church. Many of the Ukrainian Byzantine Catholics suffer with sectarianism in a fashion that equates to bigotry. One of the problems facing the Byzantine Catholic Nation is the loss of our collective National identity. More than ever before there is a lack of awareness among so many of my fellow Byzantine Catholics, a lack of awareness that we are all part of a Nation. The Jewish Nation is suffering with a very similar problem, the true members of the Jewish Nation reject the Zionist State that is called the State of Israel. The survival of the Jewish Nation is dependent on the rejection of the State of Israel, yet many of these same Jews that oppose Zionism reject the very notion that there even is a Jewish Nation despite so much historical evidence proving the existence of the Jewish Nation. Zionism typically requires a type of Nationalism in order for this hostile ideology to survive. Nationalism is the ideology that was founded upon the lies of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. Marxists embrace the lies of  Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, they do this despite all the evidence showing how incorrect Hegel's work is, but Marxists can not help themselves embracing the lies of Hegel assists Marxists in their need to justify assimilating the World into their eurocentric Humanism. Anyone expressing themselves to a Marxist can be written off by that Marxist as a dirty Nationalist attempting to cause separation throughout the World.Nationalism fuses Nation with State and this is just as much a problem in society as Capitalism. Be warned the Marxist Endgame can not fix the issues of Nationalism. Marxism as a ideology alone causes Nationalists to become stronger. It was not Capitalism that defeated the Communists, it was Nationalism that defeated the Communists. The defeat of the Communists has led so many to reject Socialism entirely. I blame the Communists for the popular denunciation of Socialism. Many of the Ukrainian Byzantine Catholics in Ukraine do not see themselves as Byzantine Catholics, they see themselves merely as Ukrainians who attend the services of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church. It just so happens that the Ukrainian Byzantine Catholics are both Byzantine Catholic and Ukrainian.It is rather common to have more than one Nationality. There are four factors to Nationality. The four factors to Nationality are Religiosity, Ethnicity, Culture and Politics.The Ukrainians are a Nation based on Culture and Ethnicity. The Byzantine Catholics are a Nation based on Culture and Religiosity. Some factors constituting integral essence contradict yet some factors constituting integral essence find grand compatibility. No one can be of two religions, to claim two religions is a contradiction. Be not mistaken, to be of two cultures and/or of two ethnicities holds no contradiction whatsoever. Applying politics to any of this is rather non sequitur, if you have read the last chapter you know what I mean. In case you did not notice I have finished the subject of subculture, it is important to bombard this chapter with the next topic that I have managed somehow to already start: the importance of Culture to the context of Nationality.

In certain cases a Nation is constituted of the two factors, Culture and Religion. In certain cases a Nation is constituted of the two factors, Culture and Ethnicity. When a Nation is constituted by the three factors, Culture, Religion and Ethnicity this is called a Folk Nation, the greatest example of a Folk Nation is that of the Armenians. In certain cases a Nation is constituted of the two factors, Culture and Politics; such a Nation is weaker than the first three described. In certain cases a Nation is constituted of the two factors, Religion and Ethnicity; such a Nation is weaker than the first four described. In certain cases a Nation is constituted of the two factors, Religion and Politics; such a Nation will be even weaker than the first five described.

I am unsure if a Nation can be constituted of Ethnicity and Politics, I do not know of any examples of this. Likewise I do not know of any Nation built upon Religion, Ethnicity and Politics.

There are five examples of Nations that are based upon Culture and Politics. Russia, America, Canada, Quebec and the nameless Nation that is collectively guilty of identity theft that calls itself Israel.

Russia is not a ethnic group, Russia is not a religious group. Russia historically had been a Country that was filled (still is) with many ethnic groups and religious groups. Russian Culture emerged before Russian Politics emerged. The emergence of Russian Culture grew out of the struggle against feudalism and Monarchy. Russian Politics was born when Autocratic Monarch Nicholas II surrendered his Crown. Russia is still a very well developed Culture, however Russia is loosing its National character because the Nationalism of Russia today is hollow and full of divided politics. I am very Anti-Communist, but that does not mean I am against Soviet Political Thought, I am more Russian in National terms than any Russian Nationalist.

I require that any Urban Scholar to define America in these words "America is a word that means different things to different people" then when you have given that much thought understand that Americanism has already damned America. Any decent American must prepare for America to end. All attempts to save America is treason against the Constitutional values that should have been forced upon Europe rather than hidden behind in order to justify robbing the indigenous Natives of this land that most Americans call America. Next I require any Urban Scholar to say "It is irrelevant what America could have been, it only matters what it is" this is hard for almost anyone identifying with American Constitutionalism. American Constitutionalism is a Social Religion without religiosity and thus it is actually political. Being religious without having religiosity is a political characteristic not a religious trait. When a person religiously defends Capitalism in the name of Protestantism this is an economic trait not a religious characteristic. Politics is formed to act as a matter of determination, this is the POWER POLITIC, this is why politics is the weakest factor in Nationality. This is because politics is a means not an ends. Economy is relations of exchange, this makes it too a means not an ends. Religiosity is a matter of Orientation, you can never be rid of it. Ethnicity exists and most likely will always exist, attempting to kill ethnicity is Genocide, attempting to force all ethnic groups into one eurocentric assimilated melting pot whether through Americanism or Communism is Cultural Genocide. American Constitutionalism was a wasted opportunity, it is time to let it go and fight the ugly monster that is Americanism. The American Culture is a Culture of dreamers, this dream is going to die as it becomes more and more nightmarish. The American Nation is defined by a Dreaming Culture of Tomorrow; waiting for a day that will never come. The American Nation is also defined by a Political movement for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Americanism has already defied and destroyed American Constitutionalism, as this political factor is destroyed by the reality that most Americans wish to ignore America will be rendered a Culture that lacks anything more than a nightmare thus ending even the American Culture.

Canada was originally just a Colonial Country just as New Zealand and Australia. But the Counter-Culture that grew out of the 1960s changed this, the immigrants that came to Canada during World War II became the most important dissenting voices during this time of Counter-Culture and the Social Democratic Politics merged together forming the Canadian Nation. This means that Canada is a new Nation, for most of Canada's history they did not constitute a Nation despite their historical revisionism that bases this fiction on Nationalism, a Nationalism which was not always felt by all the provinces and territories. Canada has been known for the most part to pride it self as being not so hostile unlike America. But at least there are two versions of America. The American Superstate that preaches a false continuity starting with Plymouth Rock to Manifest Destiny that goes further into the Terror War that hides behind the excuse of the events of September 11th of 2001; this is the America guided by the Americanists. The actual American Nation which is based on Dreaming Culture of Tomorrow known as American Constitutionalism and Political movement for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, this is the second version of America; the actual American Nation. On the other hand the American Nation did not truly exist before World War II because American Constitutionalism didn't exist until just after World War II. American Constitutionalism is a ideology that reinterprets the Bill of Rights in order to start a movement for freedom and democracy; even though it was written to protect the liberty of Aristocrats who did not want to pay taxes to British Monarchy. I myself agree with American Constitutionalism; but the dream is over none the less. So truthfully the American Nation is not that much older than the Canadian Nation. Furthermore the truth about America's history is more closer to the false continuity starting with Plymouth Rock to Manifest Destiny; this means that America is more of a Colonial Country than Canada despite how the apart this is from the American Nation it self. The Canadian Nation will outlive the American Nation; yet Canadians too will loose their Nationality because their politics is hollow and their Culture is without strong foundation of values. Canadian Socialists and American Socialists both have the duty to restore North America to the indigenous.

Quebec has always been a Nation. The primary threat to the Nation of Quebec is not the Canadian oppressors. The primary threat to the Nation of Quebec is the Nationalists trying to turn Quebec into a Nation-State. The Culture of Quebec is a Bohemian Culture. I am not referring to a resident of Bohemia; I am referring to Bohemianism. Bohemianism is the practice of an unconventional lifestyle, often in the company of like-minded people and with few permanent ties. It involves musical, artistic, literary or transcendent pursuits. In this context, Bohemians may or may not be wanderers, adventurers, or vagabonds. Quebec's Culture of Bohemianism is not shared by the ruling class of Quebec. The ruling class of  Quebec has French Colonial pursuits. Ruling classes that subject the poor cannot belong to a Nation. The State cannot exist without some group ruling over the masses. The Nation of Quebec is also based on the Political collective will of the Common People who identify with the National identity of Quebec; this is more honest than being American or Canadian.

The Citizens of the Zionist-State usually coming from Jewish background falsely refer to themselves as Israeli. This group of people who call themselves Israelis are engaging in an Antisemitic plagiarization of the Jewish Nation that is collectively known to be Israel which is all over the World, this is also a racist insult to the Palestinians who actually happen to be ancient Israelis. This nameless group of people were originally made up of several displaced Jews most who were survivors of the Holocaust. This group of mostly terrified refugees became the victims of a Neocolonialist project to assimilate all Jews into Zionism and remove the indigenous Palestinian Nation from the land. During the 1960s the nameless people whom continue to this day to be indoctrinated into the Zionist ideology began their own resistance movement to build their own Culture outside of the Nationalist ideology of Zionism; this is an artistic Culture of Al-Andalusian Hebraic poets. The political resistance against Zionism within the Zionist-State is a Pan-Hebraic Socialist movement. But this Pan-Hebraic Socialist movement will not last unless it surrenders the Sovereignty back to the Palestinians. This Pan-Hebraic Socialist movement will fail unless it gives it self a Levant name that is not Judah, that is not Israel. This Pan-Hebraic Socialist movement needs to include in its aims National-Cultural Autonomy for themselves instead of simplistic Post-Zionist Nationalism. This nameless Nation is based on Culture and Politics; having nothing to do with religiosity or ethnicity. I can see over time a coalition of Jews all over the World banning together with Palestinians to remove this nameless Nation, if that happens they will be rendered a Culture that will have to either revert back to Judaism and in humiliation surrender their children to wise Rabbis or become nameless wanderers.

Politics is the weakest factor to be part of what constitutes a Nation. Culture is the strongest factor to be part of what constitutes a Nation. Culture by it self can not constitute a Nation. Yet when Culture is joined with either Religiosity or Ethnicity that Nation has more strength to endure. This is evident throughout history. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel was a plague upon Humanity. National Cultural Autonomy is the only answer to liberate Nations. National-Cultural Autonomy is the collective Cultural rights of a Nation to live without the cohesion of the tyrannical State system. This can be enforced with Soviet Assembly Councils under a World Court that must replace the failure that is the United Nations. Coexistence must replace States, this requires a Socialist economy as well as a rejection of Communist faith in endgames for assimilation and this also requires the permanent removal of Capitalist desires and vices. We can change the World. Together we can end World hunger, even if you believe in God; indeed especially if you do then understand God hates this World of Capitalism versus Communism which is Satan's dominion, the Rapture is not in the Bible - the very notion is Anti-Biblical. As it was written: Little children, it is the end time: and as you've heard that antichrist shall come, currently are there many antichrists; for by this we know that it is the end time. Knowing this how can you deny that the heretical doctrine of the Rapture is an antichrist? I asked a rhetorical question, it is obvious that the heretical doctrine of the Rapture is an antichrist. 

Byzantine Catholics like myself were taught that this is a message to all generations, when I believed in God I could never understand how anyone could believe in the heretical doctrine of the Rapture, of course it is clear to me now that the doctrine of the Raputure is an excuse for not resisting evil. Oddly I have a more clear understanding of evil as an Atheist than I did as a believer. Evil is when one Human lacks empathy for another Human. In a larger context evil is cultural indifference. Let us together destroy cultural indifference with coexistence. National Cultural Autonomy NOW!!!     

Chapter 3

Chapter 3, Politics.

Politics is the power in society. Politics refers to organized public affairs—achieving and exercising positions of governance—the larger a society is the more necessary the power politic is. Politics (from Greek: πολιτικά Politiká "affairs of the cities") is the process of making decisions that apply to members of a group. Politics manifests in several ways for any number of reasons. Politics is not Government. Government is the governance system that starts with the organic family then further stretching out to larger and larger layers of society. Within the use of Politics a variety of methods are deployed, promoting one's own political views among people is a use of power politic, group lobbying in autonomous gatherings for the sake of planning any collective agenda is also a matter of power politic. Government is the governing body of any type of system of society, Politics is power that sometimes controls that system of society yet Politics is also power that sometimes deliberately destroys that system of society. Government is the governing body of any type of system of society yet Politics is the blood of all society. Politics is confusing to many people because most people in first world Countries are spoiled, even the poor in first world Countries are spoiled and unlikely to care to understand the basic functions of the power politic effects on public life. Absolute power is Totalitarian madness and has been the cause of collective misery for many centuries yet Anarchist powerless is equally mad. Those who hate Politics are socially immature. This does not mean that those who hate Politics are immature in a way that is cultural nor does this mean that those who hate Politics are immature in a way that is ethnic or religious. What this does mean, is that those who hate Politics lack the social maturity to understand the necessity of the power politic and how a lack of that understanding is socially damaging to entire communities. The entire purpose of the power politic is to maintain beneficial life in a way that is mutual. Although the origin of this word Politics is πολιτικά Politiká meaning "affairs of the cities", this word refers to the affairs of territories and countries, as well as it does mean affairs of the cities. The power politic is motivated by the needs of individuals and collectives alike. This means that politics is fueled by religious, ethnic, cultural, economic, and philosophic necessities. Thus the drive for manifestations of the power politic is natural in human society. Yet the power politic can take on a style of its very own away from the shell of which it first emerges. The misuse of the power politic is not the issue of activists, progressives, regressives, or revolutionaries. The misuse of the power politic is the fault of politicians and reactionaries. 

Correct politics is void of politicians.

Reactionaries stem from crumbling systems of oppression.

Reactionary politics often emerges from a repressive status quo attempting self-preservation.

Many politicians are reactionary.

Many reactionaries are politicians.

Smart politicians are reformist.

Smart reactionaries are not politicians.

To raise political awareness and shake society from apathy is the duty of revolutionaries.

It is correct to oppose reactionaries and politics alike.

The only way to rescue politics from reactionaries and politics is to revolutionary not reformist.

Reform is good when the correct government is in need of change.

Reform is evil when the government is false.

Chapter 2

Chapter 2, Ethnicity.

Ethnicity is based on two factors, the first and more important factor is common ancestry and the second factor is common geography which at often times this too is important. Ethnicity is the Heredity of bloodlines and a socially defined categorization of identification applying to collectives and individuals of a belonging to a People. The term ethnic is derived from the Greek word ἔθνος ethnos (more precisely, from the adjective ἐθνικός ethnikos, which was loaned into Latin as ethnicus). The inherited English-language term for this concept is folk. Ethnicity is an important means by which people may identify with a larger group. Ethnicity is not Religiosity yet many Ethnic groups may predominantly belong to a Religion, for example the Jewish people are not a Ethnic group yet there exists ethnic groups that are predominantly Jewish. There are many excellent examples of Ethnic groups that have a predominant religion however there are three examples of this that I feel urge to share. The first example I feel necessary to give is the Ashkenazim indeed the Ashkenazim are an Ethnic group that is predominantly Jewish yet not all of the Ashkenazim are Jewish many of the Ashkenazi Men marry Women who are not Jewish yet have offspring through those Women and neglect to raise their Children as Jewish thus not all Ashkenazim are Jewish also take into account that Judaism is a Religion and like any religion anyone can convert although according to everything I know who has credible word to speak about Judaism it is said that Judaism is the hardest religion to convert to however this can be done as a matter of fact most of my Jewish friends are converts to Judaism. The second example I have a urge to mention would undoubtedly be that Mexicans are a ethnic group that is predominately Roman Catholic yet not every Mexican is Roman Catholic as a matter of fact some Mexicans are known to identify as Muslims and it is a well known fact that the Roman Catholic Church has within its membership many ethnic groups. The third example and in my opinion the best example is that Persians (the people of Iran) are an Ethnic group that is predominately Muslim yet not every Persian is a follower of Muslim religion and it is clear that not every Muslim was born from Persian ethnic origin, in fact a large population of the Persians are completely Jewish and a certain percentage of the Persians are Zoroastrians. These three ethnicities however did not arise the same way. The Ashkenazim are a result of Judaism. The Mexicans did not arise as a result of the Roman Catholic religion, the Mexicans are the same people as the Aztec Nation and they used to be predominately a type of polytheist. The Persians did not arise as a result of the Muslim religion, Zoroastrianism used to be the predominate Religion of Iran. The distinction between race and ethnicity is considered highly problematic only because there is a such thing as Ethnicity while there really is no such thing as Race in fact most everyone who referring to race when put into a logical context is usually referring to Ethnicity. Sometimes ethnic groups are subject to prejudicial attitudes and actions by the state or its constituents indeed this is more often than not commonplace in Statism. Ethnic groups in the Continent of Africa number in the hundreds, each generally having their own language or least have their own dialect of a language. African in of it self is a bigger Ethnicity that contains many Sub-ethnic groups likewise Asian in of it self is a bigger Ethnicity that contains many Sub-ethnic groups. Race is a Fantasy based not on Religion but Cultural Misconceptions of the Other and these misconceptions are not always based on Hate or Dislike of the Other as is often assumed although it can be the result thereof. Racialism is the Cultural concept of a Group's desire not to be blended with an outside collective because of misconceptions about bloodline purity due to fear and distrust of outside collectives. Racism is Ultra-Racialism that is to say that Racism is Racialism in its most extreme tendencies. Racism also gives rise to Racial Supremacy and Racial Supremacy has been expressed a lot in the Twentieth Century and sadly is still expressed in this Twenty-first Century.

In the Twentieth Century the Jim Crow Laws of the United States of America represented Racial Supremacy in particular Jim Crow represented White Supremacy in the United States of America.

I am proud to have helped my fellow Byzantine Catholic Nationals establish the revolutionary liberation front known as Byzantine Catholic Nation, I am also very honored and humbled to have assisted my Black National Comrades to establish the revolutionary liberation front known as Black Nation. Byzantine Catholic Nation is in the struggle to help Byzantine Catholics realize that We the Byzantine Catholics constitute a Nation, we need National Cultural Autonomy and it must be understood that not every Nation has an ethnic factor to it. The Byzantine Catholic Nation has no ethnic factor, just as the Jewish Nation has no ethnic factor. Just as the Jewish Nation is based on Culture and Religion the Byzantine Catholic Nation is also based on Culture and Religion. However the Black Nation is based on Culture and Ethnicity. The Black Nation has its ethnicity from mixed African heredity and the shared common ancestry originating from Africa. Ethnicity is the continuation of a people through common ancestry, this applies to the Celts, Mexicans, Spaniards, Blacks, Italians, and Romanis yet this cannot apply to the Jews, Byzantine Catholics, or Hindus it is Nationalism that has managed to confuse what would be self evident. There is no White Nation, yet there is a Black Nation.

Blacks are distinguished from Africans because they are the descendants of the Slaves brought to Europe and the Americas by Colonialists, Black Nationality developed over time going from slavery to the oppression of Jim Crow and Jane Crow laws then to the struggle for liberation that still is ongoing, this has brought about a very interesting Culture. This is how Black is distinguished from African, African Americans can trace their origins to a particular place on the continent of Africa where as Black Americans can not. So this means that Black is a description for those who have the ancestry coming from the African slave trades. White however is just the term that describes eurocentricity, this is why both myself and Herbert identify as European not as White. Those who identify as White identify with eurocentricity whether they realize this or not. Anyone who is Black is born into that Nation, anyone who is White is doing so because of eurocentric Schooling, I denounce Whiteness, I reject White guilt as eurocentric guilt and I denounce White supremacy as eurocentric Racial supremacy and I hope that before I die to do all I can to make reparations to all who have suffered under the Colonialism of The White Lie. White Supremacy is not the only version of Racial Supremacy yet it is the most persistent. In the Twentieth Century the system of Apartheid was enforced in South Africa the political construct of the Apartheid system of South Africa was one of the most horrific displays of White Supremacy. The Apartheid system of South Africa was a White Supremacist policy enforced through legislation by the National Party (NP) governments, who were the ruling party from 1948 to 1994, of South Africa, under which the rights of the majority indigenous inhabitants of South Africa were curtailed and Afrikaner minority rule was maintained. Apartheid was developed after World War II by the Afrikaner-dominated National Party and Broederbond organizations and was practiced also in South West Africa, which was administered by South Africa under a League of Nations mandate (revoked in 1966 via United Nations Resolution 2145), until it gained independence as Namibia in 1990. Apartheid is a word that describes the tyrannical enforcement of Racial Supremacy that is textbook and worthy of Scholarship and the Zionist State of Israel is a perfect example of Apartheid that started in the Twentieth Century and is ongoing here in the Twenty-first Century. The Palestinian/Israeli conflict perfectly fits the profile of the crime of Apartheid. The crime of Apartheid is defined by the 2002 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court as inhumane acts of a character similar to other crimes against humanity "committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime." the definition of Apartheid in it self reinforces this notion for behold . . . Apartheid (Afrikaans pronunciation: [ɐˈpɑːrtɦɛit]; from Afrikaans "the state of being apart") therefore the British inspired domination of Israel's domination over Palestine fits the definition of Apartheid perfectly.

 
Ethnicity is not Race because Race does not exist. Furthermore the Human species that is said to be made in the image of God according to the Christian religion all comes from Noah and I take this to be a moral and just protest against the notion of race. All of the Ethnic groups can be traced to common origin one way or another and so the notion of different races that would suggest that not all humans are really human or that "Their humanity is not authentic." due to deranged beliefs about race is not only pure nonsense it is also immoral and runs contrary to the lessons of Religion as well as the progressive direction that Philosophy is taking in this early part of this Twenty-first Century. The largest ethnic groups in this twenty-first century comprises hundreds of millions of individuals (Han Chinese, Arabs, Bengali people) and the smallest can be limited to a few thousand individuals (numerous indigenous peoples worldwide). Ethnic groupings come under threat most often from Humanism. Indeed the Anti-Humanitarian construct of Humanism is more deadly to Ethnic groups than even the forces of Racial Supremacy. Racial Supremacy holds an obvious danger to any Ethnic group it is geared against however Humanism poses even more danger to Ethnic groups. While many Ethnic groups have suffered and struggled under the oppression of Racial Supremacy this struggle often forms greater unity for Ethnic groups suffering under such oppression and in time such Ethnic groups evolve into a stronger Ethnicity that consequently forms its own Culture and while Ethnicity and Culture are not the same thing a group can be and often is both an Ethnicity and Culture, this is what caused the existence of the Black Nation to emerge on the world scene. If a Group is both Ethnic and Cultural that makes it much stronger. Humanism is a philosophy invented by Europeans. Humanism is also the first construct of Westerndom. Marxism is a Theory of Humanism and so is Corporatism. Humanism is a practice that focuses a sort of anti-humanitarian Victorianism on the World at large. In other words it is a outlook or system of thought attaching prime importance to human centralization rather than the welfare aims of Humanitarianism or matters of mutual cultivation such as Environmentalism. Humanists do not share a creed; rather, they are unified by their shared search for Human elevation and hedonism regardless of negative consequences. Humanism has at its core the assumption that an individual’s theology is a result of that search and not obedience to orientation. Historically, Humanists have roots first in Christendom and second in Atheist Darwinism. Contemporary Humanists are typically atheist,  protestant-christian, deist or agnostic. Humanists maintain views of Populism and relying very little on facts and Humanism typically ignores most notions of Truth. Humanism typically calls for assimilation of all peoples into a Westernized Human Society the most popular form of this is the Marxist Theory yet it is Corporatism that has been attempting this the most by matters of force and subversion, indeed both Marxism and Corporatism seek the downfall of Ethnic groups by these Humanistic strategies and this is not usually done by total elimination although it usually includes some elimination however assimilation through subversion is much more preferred by Humanists. The best way for Ethnic groups to fight against Humanism is to practice Coexistence. By practicing Coexistence we can destroy the Humanist lie of Color-blindness and instead teach the concept of being lovestruck. Ethnic groups must become lovestruck, I Fredrick Danson can not love the Black Man unless he is a proud Black Man nor can a Black Man love me unless he loves the European Man. Loving each other for who we are and how different we are is sacred and this is what it means to be lovestruck. If we can teach this notion of being lovestruck we can therefore bring about the side by side Coexistence of Unity and Diversity and in doing so we just might be able to finally destroy this evil and most dangerous trend of Westerndom that is referred to as none other than Humanism.

Chapter 1

Chapter 1, Religiosity.
To understand religiosity we must first understand Orientation. Orientation describes an enduring pattern of behavioral—emotional, cooperative, social, or some combination of these—to someone’s personal identity, there are essentially two kinds of Orientation, Religious Orientation and Sexual Orientation. Today these are both highly threatened by Conformity pushers. Orientation also refers to a person's sense of "personal and social identity, something highly disregarded in Secularism.

Religious Orientation describes an enduring pattern of —emotional fixed stances, ethics, cultural state of mind or some combination of these. Religious lifestyle relates to the human soul and the traditional lessons passed from parent to child or taken up by the individual's compelled pull to a set of creeds and codes. Religion differs from private belief in that it has a public aspect religious Orientation describes a state of being known sometimes as Religiosity no scientific explanation for religiosity is known.
Sexual Orientation describes an enduring pattern of attraction—emotional, romantic, sexual, or some combination of these—to the opposite sex, the same sex, both, or neither, and the genders that accompany them. By the convention of organized researchers, these attractions are subsumed under heterosexuality, homosexuality, bisexuality, and asexuality. No simple, single cause for sexual orientation has been conclusively demonstrated and it remains an enigma. 

Secularism has proven to be the single greatest active threat to the very existence of Orientation. Secularism has promoted to the Abrahamic religions the assumption that God is against homosexuality, this is mostly done by using the Abrahamic religious necessity of constant breeding as a way of promoting homophobia, this is easier to promote than some realize, think about this and give it time to sink deep in the mind. The Roman Catholic Church which although a Religious Community was controlled by an Occult Order known as the Vatican. Ironically the most fundamental Saints of the Catholic religion such as St. Francis of Assisi and St. Augustine of Hippo held Virtues that remain even now diametrically opposed to everything the Vatican stands for. The Vatican Cult that used the Roman Catholic Church by proxy expressed a hostility to homosexuals. Secularists by order of the Corporatocracy have promoted the idea that Abrahamic religion and sometimes the idea that all religion is extremely homophobic, likewise Secularists by use of Corporatocracy have convinced several members of Abrahamic Religion and even in some bizarre cases members of other Religions that Homosexuals are out to destroy every family unit. Secularism is clearly the most Corporate inspired of all the excepted trends of the modern World and it is unquestioned by almost everyone today, hopefully that is about to change. It is important to understand that the Irreligious and the Secularists are not the same people. Irreligiousness is nothing more and nothing less than a lack of religiosity. Secularism is the material centered life. Secularists seek a world of justified greed while pretending to be moralistic. That is why there are no secular Christians or secular Jews there are only nonobservant Christians and nonobservant Jews.

 

Atheist Christians exist and Agnostic Christians exist.

I am an Atheist Christian.

Chris Hedges is openly an Agnostic Christian.

But is there a such concept as Christianity Nationality? No!

Byzantine Catholic Nationality on the other hand exists and so does Armenian Nationality.

Getting back to religiosity; religion is the glue of society. Religion is the respect for what is sacred. In essence religion is a state of being and in particular a state of life bound by monastic vows. This means that many so-called political convictions are unrealized religious convictions. Anyone who swears by the United States Declaration of Independence and the United States Bill of Rights indeed is religious. Religion is sometimes expressed in Social religion, American Constitutionalism is a Social religion. Religion is sometimes expressed in Liberal religion, Academia is a Liberal religion. Religion is sometimes expressed in Conservative religion, Masculinism is a Conservative religion. There is nothing wrong with Social religion, Liberal religion or Conservative religion, on the contrary the beautiful essence of organized religion only becomes weak and dead when these forces are taken away from religiosity. The Liberal Church is dead because it has lost Liberal religion and has thrown away its Academia and replaced it with neoliberal political correctness. Black Baptist and Pentecostal Churches are weak and anemic due to a lack of the old Social religion that was seen in Dr. King and gone are the voices of dissent that his American Constitutionalist tradition gave the World. Where is the Conservative religion of Masculinism that we used to see in the Orthodox Jewish people? It is as if you have to be in Williamsburg, Brooklyn just to see any trace of the old Conservative religion of Masculinism that was once so fundamental to Orthodox Jews.

Humanism is another problem.

Humanism is a philosophy and practice that focuses on anti-humanitarian Victorianism. In other words it is an outlook or system of thought attaching prime importance to human rather than sacred or environmental matters. Humanists do not share a creed; rather, they are unified by their shared search for Human supremacy over anything sacred or environmental and by the understanding that an individual’s theology is a result of that search and not obedience to orientation. Secular humanism specifically rejects religiosity and Religious humanism is an integration of humanist philosophy with an attempt to mix it with religious rituals and beliefs that center on humanist thought. Organized religion should reject Religious humanism as a form of heresy because Religious humanism is fundamentally incompatible with religiosity. Secular humanism is geared more towards Oligarchy and has built in qualities that are self destructive and are geared in the direction of Communism. Communism is fundamentally Anti-Socialist at its core and the reason for this is that Communism especially as described by Karl Marx is the disastrous delusion of a Secular Humanist will. 

The need to defend religion is a growing need today as the Secularists with all their homophobic neoliberal Capitalism and Darwinism bring us into collective suicide and cultural indifference.

Noam Chomsky is an Atheist Jew who is full of Jewishness and Jewishness is the orientation of any Jew. Jewishness is Jewish religiosity and Jewish religiosity is the intense drive towards Social Justice this type of drive can only be worn by a Jewish person. Sure anyone can be driven by a need for Social Justice but this drive for Social Justice that is intertwined with the Jewish intellectual tradition is called Jewishness and it's something only a Jew can have. Jewishness is the religiosity of a Jew. However religiosity is not the same thing as religious observance. Anyone who is religiously observant yet lacks religiosity is by definition a religious hypocrite. Anyone who has religiosity yet lacks religious observance is simply nonobservant. Religiosity bleeds through nonobservant Christians as well as nonobservant Jews. The religiosity of a Christian is called stewardship.

I am an Atheist Christian and rather nonobservant I don't believe in God or Heaven or Hell. But I believe that Jesus died for my sins, Jesus was Amadou Diallo who died for me, crucified by the New York City Police Department. The Lynching of Black People was Jesus and the crucifixion by the Ku Klux Klan. The cultural genocide of Native Americans and the robbing of their religion to satisfy some type of Vatican Spanish imperialism and White Anglo Saxon Protestant crusade was a crucifixion of Jesus and this means that heretics of my religion were responsible for crucifying Jesus. The persecution of Muslims in America because of the destruction of the World Trade Center that has led to this Terror-War on Religion is a crucifixion and the Christian humanists are behind it from what I see joined of course by Zionism and Capitalism, this is a crucifixion of Jesus. This is happening today and this popularizing of Islamophobia is a crucifixion of Jesus make no mistake the Oil that America is taking from Iraq is the blood and water that flows from the side of Jesus that was made by the spear that has stabbed him. Jesus dies for my sins everyday and so I must follow him. I must love my neighbor as my self because that is stewardship and stewardship is Christian religiosity. There is no religion without religiosity and religiosity is a matter of orientation. Sometimes the only way to understand a misunderstood subject is by showing contrast. My friend Herbert Dillon is irreligious and he is anti-secular. Herbert and I do not agree on everything in fact you could say that some of the most touchy subjects I bring up he will provide imposingly alternative views that restructure everything I say. Herbert Dillon is a Igtheist and like me he hates Communism and Capitalism, like me he is a Socialist but unlike me he holds a grudge against every version of Libertarianism and unlike me he does not distinguish between Capitalism and Corporatism. I'm not just an Anti-Communist and an Anti-Capitalist I am also an Anti-Corporatist so this keeps me and my best friend on the same level except he sees two evils and I see three evils, we do see the same evil just in different ways. Herbert Dillon also believes in conspiracy theories that are unknown to most conspiracy theorists, Herbert Dillon believes that the world is controlled by Classic Deists and that modern-Deists are but unwitting members of a smokescreen. Herbert Dillon believes that there are three post-feudal ways of politics and I do not. 

Herbert believes that Corporatism/Capitalism is the first post-feudal way of politics. 
He believes that Communism is the second post-feudal way of politics. 
He believes that Fascism/Nazism/Corporate Nationalism is the third post-feudal way of politics.  

Herbert renders the words of Fascism/Nazism/Corporate Nationalism when speaking in a general context as Social Nationalist Corporatism for umbrella term usage to describe the many strands of the so-called third post-feudal way of politics, his term Social Nationalist Corporatism is used by none that I know of other than himself. I do not believe that these political ideologies are related so I have no word for such a concept, Nazism and Corporate Nationalism are two distinct ideologies and Fascism is a common manifestation of the twentieth century and as it stands today unless something changes the twenty-first century as well.

 

It is very important to remember that both Herbert Dillon and myself refer to Benito Amilcare Andrea Mussolini's Corporatism NOT as Corporatism at all rather we call this theory Corporate Nationalism. Corporate Nationalism is the Theory and practice of organizing the whole of society into corporate entities subordinate to the state. According to the theory, employers and employees would be organized into industrial and professional corporations serving as organs of political representation and largely controlling the people and activities within their jurisdiction. This idea found favor in central Europe after the French Revolution, but it was not put into practice until Benito Mussolini came to power in Italy. Many differences can be seen between Herbert and myself and yet we both hold religion to be important and we both are against the longevity of Nationalism yet see it as the only way to destroy Corporatism.

Herbert believes that Corporatism/Capitalism is the power of the elites who he calls the Classic Deists or the Deist Corporatocracy as he also calls them.

Herbert also believes that Social Nationalist Corporatism is the alternative of this Deist Corporatocracy.

Herbert's most startling and hard to believe concept is that Communism is the controlled opposition of the Deist Corporatocracy designed as nothing more than a vacuum to control all genuine Socialist Revolutionaries so that they never come close to the Deist Corporatocracy thus insuring that the Bourgeoisie who are all Classic Deists are never destroyed. 

Herbert Dillon's Nationality is Celtic he identifies as nothing else. Both his mother and father were Welsh Americans his mother is a Wiccan and his father was Anglo Catholic but they taught him Celtic Cultural ideas and his ethnicity is clearly Celtic as well. So even though Herbert may be a citizen of the United States of America that is not his Nationality his Nationality is Celtic.

As mentioned in the prologue of this thesis A Nation is a grouping that may or may not be located on a country. NATION is defined by religiosity, ethnicity, political affiliation, cultural awareness or any combination of these. Celtic nationality is not dependent on British identity or British sovereignty and there is more than one strand of Celtic nationality one is Welsh, another Irish and yet another Scottish yet there are even more strands of Celtic nationality than even these as a matter of fact a National of Celtic heritage like Herbert might be inclined to say (as he often does) that Welsh, Irish and Scottish although part of the greater Celtic family tree are actually descent from Celtic nationality and that these constitute their own nationalities, yet if you ask him how a person of Welsh decent like himself is more of a Celt rather than being Welsh, his reply will be that his National upbringing was Celtic and he does not identify with the Welsh yet identifies with the Celtic nation.

Herbert applies his Journalistic attitude in a Celtic warlike fashion and he hopes that after he dies that he will be set on logs and have a fiery arrow launched at him while drifting off to sea, which is more of a Celtic cultural tradition rather than something Welsh, Irish, or Scottish and this tradition was kept alive by both Celtic Christians as well as Celtic Pagans, of course other Nationalities have held this tradition too not just the Celts but the example is relevant none the less. The Romanis are a very nomadic Nation and they have no desire for a homeland and they should not be forced to conform to borders that threaten their way of life. The Romanis often referred to as Gypsies are both an Ethnic group and a Cultural group. The Romani nation exists whether Nationalists recognize the Romani nation or not. Blacks constitute a Nation as well, my awareness of Nationality as distinct from Nationalism really began with my time among four different Black communities all four of these communities knew each other rather well. Herbert has been in touch with the same Black communities that I know and I learned a great deal about Romanis from him and his late wife. She had a very large family many of her family are indeed friends of mine as well as friends of Herbert. Herbert's current wife is both Romani and Celtic, learning from her about dual identity I have seen that one can have more than one Nationality. From this I was able to recognize that I too have more than one Nationality.

Herbert has strong Celtic ethnic bloodlines as well as a strong Celtic cultural identity thus anyone who might have the audacity to say that he lacks a strong Celtic nationality is a fool and a moron. Now it is clear that he is irreligious and yet pro-Religion and that he has Nationality and yet he is not an Atheist he is an Igtheist. An Igtheist is someone who requires a definition of God or gods before he or she can say with any certainty that such a concept exists. Herbert Dillon remains an Igtheist and irreligious to this day while I remain an Atheist with a strong Christian identity, therefore it is clear Religion although in its Orthodox conception is not exclusive to personal belief or Dogmatic philosophy. Atheism is a Dogmatic philosophy that reaches beyond the personal belief that the supernatural does not exist. The Atheist rejects the notion of the supernatural, Atheism on the other hand is the Dogmatic philosophy of no-god, not all Atheists embrace Atheism, I'm a Atheist who rejects Atheism as a dangerous philosophy of Humanism and chauvinism serving the ambitions of Darwinism and Capitalism. The Agnostic rejects the notion of whether God or gods can be proven or dis-proven, Agnosticism is the Dogmatic philosophy that the Agnostic belief is the truest model for Society. Agnosticism is a dying Dogmatic philosophy that is being outshouted by the Dogmatic philosophy of Atheism. Whether the Dogmatic philosophy of Agnosticism ever gains new popularity or not is not something I can predict however what I can say is almost every Agnostic today is Jewish, Christian or Buddhist and most Agnostics today would look at Agnosticism and say that it's disingenuous.

There is no Religion without Religiosity and many nonobservant and even nonbelievers are religious by default because of their Religiosity.

Prologue

National Cultural Autonomy 

By Fredrick Danson.

Prologue to National Cultural Autonomy

My name is Fredrick Danson I was born of a British father and a Russian mother, my father was a Anglo Catholic and my Mother was a Russian Orthodox Christian and as for me I became a Byzantine Catholic at the age of twenty and three. My Nationality is American, Russian and Byzantine Catholic. My citizenship is American so I am not recognized as a Russian and I do not care. I'm a Post-Soviet and a Anti-Communist. My longest lasting relationship was with my boyfriend who was Russian and I miss him very much but in 1999 he died of the A.I.D.S virus and it has passed to me, so if I am to die I will be sure that my knowledge is passed to those who will use it for Generations to come and hopefully those who I inspire shall outdo me. Ever since I was a boy I have been deeply influenced by my mother's Anti-Communism and my father's Anti-Capitalism. I am a Urban Scholar but let me make it clear I owe much to the Academics. I do not believe in the three post-feudal ways of modern politics, these being number one Capitalism, number two Communism, and number three Fascism/Nazism/Corporate Nationalism. I do not expect for the reader to embrace everything I say, I'm confident I will have full disciples as well as critics as well as those who agree with me in part.

National Cultural Autonomy was truly a notion that was originally expressed by the Jewish Labor Bund. To explain National Cultural Autonomy it is necessary to understand what Nationality is.

Nationality is not Nationalism.

Nationality is not the legal relationship between an individual human and a state.

Nationality is the person's National-identity, not State-conformity or State-bound loyalty.

A Nation is NOT a state.

A Nation is a grouping that may or may not be located on a country. NATION is defined by religiosity, ethnicity, political affiliation, cultural awareness or any combination of these. Jewish nationality and Byzantine-Catholic nationality are the most consistent manifestations of Nationality. Nationals typically stand against the prisons of Nationalism and the forced-conformity of Corporatism. Ultimately it is Nationalism that destroys Nations. Corporatism is a threat to Nationality as well, but neither of these are justifiable according to Nationals. A National is not a Nationalist because a National does not consider his or her National-identity to be married to a Nation-state. Nationals typically advocate Nationality. A National should not be confused with a Nationalist because the constructs of Country, State and Nation-state are distinguishable:

 

#1 A Country is a Sovereign land.

#2 A State is defined by a Government's estate of a Country.

#3 A Nation-state(this system is known as Nationalism) is when the State is fused with the Nation, this has been the root of great many of disasters, and thus Orthodox Nationals have a tendency to be nomadic and at times become self-segregated.

Nationality is incompatible with the forces of Marxism, Free Enterprise, Reichism, Anti-Religion, Racism, Zionism, Pan-Arabism, Corporatism, Supremacy, and Fascism. Human Rights are self evident, the right to build and/or preserve a Nation is a Human Right, National preservation is a Human right. Nationality does not pose a threat to genuine Socialism nor does Nationality pose a threat to genuine Free Trade. Nationality is not against all forms of Socialism and Nationality is not against all forms of Patriotism, but it stands against Nationalism and Corporatism. Nationality is the commonality of peoplehood. Nationalism is only one form of Statism another version of Statism would be Imperialism. How can a National survive today at all when what is required is to brake free of the Nationalist-world and at the same time not be destroyed by the Corporatist-world that requires the death of Nationalism in order to ensure Total Corporatism? Can some form of Nationalism that allows independent Autonomy be made in order to ensure the total end of Corporatism? 

If Corporatism is destroyed what will it take to then be rid of Nationalism once it would then no longer be needed? 

This is my Thesis and in this Thesis I seek to explain how to maintain National Cultural Autonomy.