Chapter 13

Chapter13, Dialectical Reciprocity

Dialectical Reciprocity is the synthesis between Dialectical materialism and Reciprocity without the linear historical materialism which is proven to be historical revisionism on par with holocaust denial. Dialectical Reciprocity rejects both holocaust denial and linear historical materialism. Reciprocity is a process of exchanging things with other people in order to gain a mutual benefit. The rule of reciprocity, is a social ethic where if someone does something for you, you then feel obligated to return the favor which stands in contrast to both Nationalism and Communism. If we lived by the rule of reciprocity, children would learn to share with each other, take turns, and engage in reciprocal actions. Instead the rule of competition is the daily bread of most children. Hostility is the norm of society now that Capitalism has defeated Communism. Dialectical materialism is a philosophy of science, history, and nature developed in Europe and based on the writings of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. This concept only became genuinely material with Vladimir Lenin before that Dialectical materialism was no better than Idealism. Marxist dialectics, as a materialist philosophy, emphasizes the importance of real-world conditions and the presence of contradictions within things, limited to class only. This is in contrast to the Leninist dialectic, which emphasizes the observation that contradictions in material phenomena could be resolved by analyzing them and synthesizing a solution whilst retaining their essence. It is also with Leninism that National Struggle became recognized as part of the Revolutionary Process yet there was still a rejection of Jewish Nationality and Byzantine Catholic Nationality. What is needed is Dialectical Reciprocity which also fits into a Theory from the Black Panther Party known as Revolutionary Intercommunalism. Dialectical Reciprocity is the only way to deal with Communists. Communists think that they can argue against real Socialists because they know how to argue with Anarchists and win such pointless irrelevant debates. Debating the Communists is not hard. I have never lost a debate to a Communist. Showing a great deal of Reciprocity towards the various types of Communist is a vain pursuit which in many cases may even get you killed. Marxist-Leninists and Maoists respond the best to Reciprocity. Anarcho Communists only know how to accuse everyone of being Jewish as if that was a crime of some sort. Trotskyists will only belittle anyone who dares to disagree with them. Classical Marxists, Orthodox Marxists and Libertarian Marxists only care about spreading Socialism by using a Communist Nation-State to spread a Communist Empire across the World so that everyone is assimilated into Communism. These Communists are not much better than Trotskyists. Trotskyists still oppose Dialectical Reciprocity. Every time I try to teach young Radicals about Dialectical Reciprocity it is the Trotskyists who resort to pure violence. 

Dialectical Reciprocity requires respect and honesty. Dialectical Reciprocity requires acknowledging that the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics saved the World from Nazism while also acknowledging that Joseph Stalin failed to see Adolf Hitler as the primary contradiction until the Nazi invasion of Stalingrad forced him to see otherwise. In the 1930s, a great deal of Communists, Bundists and Social Democrats from Germany and Austria sought refuge from the Nazis in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. These were some of the bravest, most courageous people in history yet the Soviet secret police handed over hundreds of these dissenting voices to the Gestapo. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics’s 1936 constitution afforded “the right of asylum to foreign citizens persecuted for defending the interests of the working people.” But the bureaucracy of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics betrayed their own Constitution when dealing with hundreds of German and Austrian exiles, handing them over to the Nazis from the late 1930s on. Many of the victims were Bundists, given Joseph Stalin's book Marxism and the National Question it should be no shock that Joseph Stalin would let the Nazis deal with his Bundist problem. As bad as this is, Leon Trotsky would have done much worse in all probability doing the same as Adolf Hitler given his victorious attacks on Judaism when he led the Red Army on that Aristocratic Train of Privilege that he commanded from. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics signed a nonaggression pact with Nazi Germany in August 1939. The Wehrmacht invaded Poland a week later. Dialectical Reciprocity requires seeing how flawed Joseph Stalin really was while simultaneously acknowledging that Leon Trotsky was an antisemitic hardliner. Stalin was never equipped to fight antisemitism because he based his entire view of Jews on Lenin's very misinformed aristocratic views of them. Dialectical Reciprocity requires admitting that Stalin – An Appraisal of the Man and his Influence is a Book of Slander with clearly racist undertones which is rather typical of Trotsky's racism towards Georgians. When sourcing such a silly book it lacks foundation much like most of Trotsky's work. The more that Leon Trotsky slandered Joseph Stalin the more it became obvious to Stalin that Trotsky's exile was not enough. This is why Trotsky got the Ice-pick. Having all of this awareness comes to Demarchist lips all the time yet this causes both Trotskyists and Marxist-Leninists to find themselves in a bit of a emotional state of being, thus derailing any honest conversation so be warned. Marxist-Leninists act like you are crazy when you point out to them that Joseph Stalin was in favor of the creation of a Zionist State, sure he regretted this but regrets don't abolish Zionism. Trotskyists should not even be approached as they are all scum. Trotskyists surround Abraham Weizfeld. Abraham Weizfeld is the last Bundist. Marek Edelman is called the last Bundist. To say that Marek Edelman is a Bundist at all is just a lie. If telling the truth still holds value than it needs to be said that Marek Edelman used to be a Bundist but is now just a Liberal. The last Bundist is Abraham Weizfeld not Marek Edelman. It would be a taxing challenge to reach Abraham Weizfeld, he has very intellectually dishonest views on Joseph Stalin and Leon Trotsky. One conversation with me and Abraham Weizfeld would realize that Stalin was merely a fool while Trotsky was tyrannical. Unfortunately for me I can not make this virus slow down. I also happen to know that as great as Abraham Weizfeld is he can never get away from the Anarcho Communists and Trotskyists who have spooked him. As it stands Abraham Weizfeld is without Comrades. I am the Comrade of the last Bundist but he does not have any awareness of me. I have tried now for twelve years to get in touch with Abraham Weizfeld but I never get anywhere. Maybe I am not going through the correct channels. Abraham Weizfeld has known such individuals as Mohammed Abdel Rahman Abdel Raouf al-Qudwa al-Husseini and Muammar Muhammad Abu Minyar al-Gaddafi. Dialectical Reciprocity requires recognizing Abraham Weizfeld while denouncing Marek Edelman. 

Dialectical Reciprocity requires having a decolonizing language. This means saying that Whiteness is a lie. This means recognizing that within the First World it is Black People who have the capacity to overthrow the First World. This means that the First World is a global Bourgeoisie and that the Third World is a global Proletariat. Dialectical Reciprocity is how Demarchy starts thus giving rise to Socialism. Dialectical Reciprocity is more advanced than basic Reciprocity yet this remains unnoticed.