Monday, April 8, 2019

Chapter 10

Chapter 10, World Transcendentalism.


There are those who say that we need Secularism, even though Secularism is a position of bigotry. What the World needs is Transcendentalism, but not the American Transcendentalism that is pathetic and only capable of making everyone believe in the dangerous notion of Metaphysics. We need World Transcendentalism.

 All society and societies have three basic pillars, Social ethics, Civil ethics and Societal ethics.  World Transcendentalism is a societal ethic, but in order to understand it, I must first explain the other two ethics.



    Social ethics have to do with social norms, and deviance.  

I will use Heteronormality and Pan-normality as examples.  Heteronormative social norms depict any lifestyle different to it as a deviance and a damnable offense.  The problem here is that history and nature prove that being heterosexual, bisexual, homosexual and asexual are not deviances from sexuality but expressions of it.  Pan-normality accepts this fact and is therefore preferable to heteronormality.  Pansexuals transcend sexual orientation in the same way the irreligious transcend religiosity.  This is why only pan-normality can replace heteronormality.  Belonging to a heteronormative society does not mean homophobia is encouraged. Heteronormality however does have systemic issues that leads to bigotry.


    Civil ethics are the standards of common community.

One of the most typical and sadly cliche features of a Civil ethic is that it is usually either Libertarian or Totalitarian. Very seldom anymore is a Civil ethic Authoritarian.
Libertarianism means that a individual’s “freedom” can come at the expense of another’s individual liberty.  Humanism is not humanitarian.  Humans that make themselves the center of everything- unlike humanitarianism, Humanism does not seek to ensure human welfare, rather it promotes human desire over human necessity. Secular Humanism is secularism with humanist characteristics.  Thus, as we push for world transcendentalism, the anti-environmentalism of the secularism of the secular human will push those of us fighting for World Transcendentalism to a state of war if we don’t attack first.  If we wait too long the environmental state of the world is going to deteriorate to the point where we no longer have a planet to live on.  The future of our World literally depends on it.

 Realizing just how much cultural genocidal domination that the bigoted nature of Western Evils holds hostage over the collective hive mind of Humanity today, I can see that I have to go off on yet another tangent in order to avoid neglecting context. 

Feminism is a type of Libertarianism often overlooked. Its roots lie in the later years of the 19th Century when the European women were offended that the recently freed male slaves potentially had more rights than they did. It could also be considered a form of Maternal Colonialism, as demonstrated by the Temperance Movement and Suffragists. Notice the rights they were fighting for did not apply to women of color. Followed to its logical conclusion, Feminism today is more of a modern kind of Matriarchy than an egalitarian or Civil Rights movement. One does not need to oppress the other when fighting for one's rights. It would be as if Dr King, Jr. had fought for european immigrants and their descendants to be sold into slavery and beaten. Nonsense! Feminism and the rights it claims to fight for are two different things, now.

It is important to note here that a true Matriarchal society never existed. The Amazons are a Greek myth based probably on the Scythians, who had women warriors out of necessity, as the men were often out on long campaigns as they migrated. Even the Minaons may have had a more matrilineal culture than a matriarchal one, as such cultures are existent even to this day. Whatever form of Matriarchy that might come from this toxic Feminism might actually be the oppressive force Feminism claims Patriarchy to be.

Let me here talk about this "Patriarchy" the Feminists rail against so much. The real issue Feminism caused was a prolonging of the Labor Problem. The Labor Problem has never been solved. For the uninitiated, the Labor Problem is the exploitation of the worker by the capitalist class. As wages steadily decline due to inflation and inadequate remuneration for their labor, the worker suffers more each year. Then, as the women joined the workforce, the workforce doubled and women could now be exploited as much as their male counterparts. It was then possible for both the man and woman of the household to be exploited, and it created a band-aid to the Labor Problem.

   Every other major problem created by the exploitation of the woman worker is not due to some male conspiracy so much as it is due to the exploitative nature of Capitalism. It is therefore incumbent on the Feminist to address their concerns not from a standpoint of their genitals, but from a standpoint of their inherent class. Capitalism does not care for your genitals, nor your religion, nor your politics unless it can be exploited for monetary gain and to your detriment.

    So we can understand that Transcendentalism revokes the idea of imposing one's own ethics, be they social, religious or civil, in favor of accepting that within the greater society of the World, different ethics exist. As stated above, however, being accepting comes with the caveat of some forms of ethics to be intolerable. These intolerable ethics are judged by no other merit or metric except that they conflict directly with the values of Transcendentalism and are either Totalitarian or Libertarian in nature. Each Nation of the world must be allowed to govern their own within the laws of their Nation, regardless of political borders. When a person from one nation commits a crime against a person from another, the Cosmopolitanal Law will apply.

        To put this another way, consider that Moral Relativism removes entirely the idea that your Nation's ethics applies to another Nation, but leaves you with no recourse for when another Nation's ethics are Intolerable. World Transcendentalism acknowledges that the Moral Relativist has removed themself from taking action, but considers them spineless for not confronting Totalitarian and Libertarian ethics. There must be a limit and an enforceable standard that transcends and unites all Nations while protecting their autonomy from other Nations.

     Secularism intertwines with Feminism and Feminism intertwines with Heteronormality. Feminism also can help Lesbians to an extent yet it adds to their objectification by Heterosexual Men. Feminism is also highly oppressive to Gays like myself, payed Liberal Gay Gatekeepers that get on Capitalist media tend to champion Feminism, they do this at the expense of our further alienation in Heteronormal society. Feminism has never been more powerful than it is now, yet as Feminists gain more and more power already in full control of the Civil ethic of the United States of America and the Continent  Europe it becomes more and more accepted as fact without investigation that women are oppressed and that Men are all equally free and this is done and the expense of what Whiteness is doing to the Black Nation and what the First World is doing to the Third World.

  In retrospect I just did more of a written Montage of the overlapping intertwined issues, it was very necessary, so now I return to the main subject.


The Civil ethic that must replace Feminism needs to be Masculinism. If we fail to correctly challenge the Libertarian folly of Feminism it will become the Totalitarian rule of Matriarchy, whether this Matriarchy will be openly referred to as Matriarchy or whether this Matriarchy will still call it self Feminism is unclear to me, I only know we need to prevent this, we can not prevent this with outdated Patriarchy. Patriarchy must be upgraded to Masculinism. I am openly a Gay Masculinist. Masculinism is for Men and Women, unlike Feminism which is only for Women. But let us not get this confused with the reactionary Men's Rights Movement (MRM) which hijacked the just cause of the Men's Movement. The Men's Movement openly used the word Masculinist which the Men's Rights Movement barely uses at all anymore. I will need to explain what Masculism is before I go any further. 





    Societal ethics are things that pervade all of society and are far broader. 

Secularism is a kind of societal ethic that claims to be inclusive and tolerant of religion, so long as it doesn’t influence politics.  The issues here is that most people are motivated politically by their religion.  The opposition for the existence of the apartheid state of Israel by the Jews is religiously motivated.  In fact, many oppressive Christian laws have passed under the guise of “secularism”. Politics is always colored by the religious orientation of the politician and it is part of personal identity and cannot be separate.  It’s therefor necessary that we allow ourselves as a society to transcend the theocratic and irreligious domination over the other in our politics.  When the political party can make a religious appeal but espouse secularism all that is happening is a subversion of that religion.  If your religion motivates your politics, this kind of sham is easily identified for what it is.  Theocratic societal ethics, however, are not always harmful.  In fact theocratic societal ethics are somewhat necessary for orthodox groups such as the Jewish Nation and Muslims.  This is not to say that we should all embrace theocratic societal ethics, rather that it, unlike secularism, is as least functional in small groups.
 The solution, then, is to transcend.  Transcending isn’t “rising above” religious motivation, it is understanding that those motivations are for the good of their communities.  Where these community goals align and overlap is the job of politics to determine and implement.  For we all well know that Secular politics have only benefited Corporatism and the rape of our planet and natural resources.  It never has truly benefited people.  Therefore we need World Transcendentalism.











No comments:

Post a Comment