Chapter 4

Chapter 1, Culture.

I shall explain Culture in this chapter.
To avoid confusion let me clarify that I am referring to Human Culture. 
Culture is the collective social norms of a people bound together in the sharing of tradition that adapts to changes in society while simultaneously preserving the distinct characteristics which make that people unique. The word Culture is often used as an umbrella term which encompasses the social behavior, and norms found in human societies, as well as the knowledge, beliefs, arts, laws, customs, capabilities and habits of the individuals in these groups. This is not necessarily incorrect but the true emphasis on the proper definition of Culture is the distinct characteristics which make a People unique, shared values in a traditional yet adaptable set of norms for a collective is the very essence of Culture. A cultural norm codifies acceptable conduct in society; it serves as guideline for behavior, dress, language, and demeanor in a situation, which serves as a template for expectations in a social group.

A subculture is a group of people within a culture that differentiates itself from the parent culture to which it belongs, often maintaining some of its founding principles. Subcultures develop their own norms and values regarding cultural, political and sexual matters. Subcultures are part of society while keeping their specific characteristics intact. Examples of subcultures include, goths and hippies. The concept of subcultures was developed in sociology and cultural studies. However the evidence for the existence of subculture groups can be seen all over recorded history. The best example is the Jewish Culture; in the tribal period of Jewish history when the Israelite Tribes maintained the Torah Culture they remained culturally united as well as united by their collective religiosity. Within this period of Jewish history they had within their culture twelve subcultures. The Culture is believed to have split due to a political difference those tribes that stood with the party of Joseph versus those that stood with the party of Judah. Eurocentric academics tend to ignore the Jewish narrative of Jewish history; which is a mistake because there is a lot of evidence for a Tribal system that was not based in tribal chauvinism. The early Israelite history seems to have upheld a form of Tribal Socialism which seems to have been based around a strong Torah Culture and a deeply Religious Covenant. It would seem that the collapse of the Israelite tribes was due to a lack of observance of the Religious Covenant; at least according to the Jewish scriptures. There has never been given much of a convincing argument against the Jewish scriptures concerning Jewish history, only eurocentric arguments that stink of Whiteness. I will explain Tribal Socialism in the next chapter and I will give a better example of Tribal Socialism that will prove more convincing on the notion of a historic example of Tribal Socialism. The collapse of the Israelite tribes' entire saga was recorded in the Jewish scriptures, we know that all that remained of them was the tribes of Judah, Benjamin, Levi and arguably Joseph in the form of the Samaritans. We know that overtime without the Torah Culture that the Peoples of Judea and Galilee evolved into the ethnicity we call today the Palestinians. We also know that the Jewish Culture survived because of other groups taking on the Religious Covenant thus inheriting the Torah Culture. Cultures can emerge as a result of Religion. Ethnic groups can emerge as a result of Culture. Ethnic groups can also emerge as a result of Religion, for example Sephardi ethnicity is a result of Judaism which is both a cultural and religious system. The Alhambra Decree made conversion to Judaism near impossible and this is the origin of the Sephardim, before this conversion to Judaism was more common. Judaism has remained a single Culture but it has developed subcultures due to the cultural differences between Ashkenazim and Sephardim; one of these differences is only recently since the twentieth century, I am of course referring to the acceptance of bisexual wives under a Jewish patriarchal household, something more common to Sephardim before the Holocaust. After the Holocaust the Zionist regime carried out a major campaign of Cultural Genocide against several parts of Sephardi Culture including most if not all of the evidence that Tarot cards was a Sephardi invention not a Romani invention, indeed there was a time when large Sephardi populations did not see Tarot as divination, rather seeing it as connected to the Sephirot a sort of Kabbalah practice. Hermetic cults like to pretend that they were the first to connect Tarot to the Sephirot but this is not the truth, rather they simply understood that Tarot was a Sephardi concept that was intimately connected to the Sephirot.

I will go further into defining Culture by explaining Byzantine Catholic Culture.
The fall of Constantinople was in the year 1453 A.D, the dwindling Byzantine Empire came to an end when the Ottomans breached Constantinople's ancient land wall after besieging the city for 55 days.
Many individual Greek Orthodox Christians, then under Ottoman rule, embraced communion with Rome yet maintained their traditions carried over from the Greek Orthodox Church.

I will need to go on a detour here because if I don't then you will get confused:

The word Catholic (forget etymology, definition is more valid here) is a word meaning Universal Christian. Knowing this, let us understand the glaring difference between Roman Catholicism which does not constitute culture yet does constitute religion and Byzantine Catholic which constitutes culture and religion both.

The words Roman Catholic should never be thought of as Universal Christian Roman. The words Roman Catholic actually mean Old World Universal Christian. The Roman Empire was the Old World Order. The Old World refers to Africa, Asia and Europe. This is texbook, a Roman Catholic is a Old World Universal Christian.

The words Byzantine Catholic should never be thought of as Universal Christian of Byzantium. The words Byzantine Catholic must never be mistaken to mean Catholic of the Byzantine rite. The words Byzantine Catholic actually mean Greco-Roman Universal Christian. The Empire of Byzantium was the continuation of the Roman Empire in its eastern provinces during Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages, when its capital city was Constantinople (modern Istanbul, formerly Byzantium). Byzantine Catholics emerge after the fall of Constantinople. The Byzantine Catholic Nation is founded upon the oldest of Catholic religious traditions and the Greco-Roman culture that has its roots in the society of Byzantium.

The detour is over depart from it with memory of what you just learned: 

Language always has its origin in Culture. Even though language comes from Culture, a language may transcend Culture, furthermore not every Culture produces language.

To fully understand the Byzantine Catholic Culture there are three factors that must be understood in context. And before I get into that understand that the Church is not a building, Church is a word for the Body of Christ which refers to all Christians. When one hears of the separations of the Churches, one is hearing of the separations of the Body of Christ which refers to the separation of the Christians. The word for a building of worship where Church gathers for worship, liturgy, confession and duty is Parish. The word Cathedral likewise describes; building of worship where Church gathers for worship, liturgy, confession and duty yet having higher authority rank than Parish.

The first factor to grasp is language. 
The Byzantine Catholic Church utilizes several languages for the purposes of liturgy. Every divisional sector of the Byzantine Catholic Church utilizes the liturgy of the Byzantine-Greek rite.
Historically the most important non-Greek variants of Byzantine Rite are: Byzantine-Slavonic and Byzantine-Georgian. The universal language of the Byzantine Catholic Culture is Slavonic, the opposition to the recognition of this fact is higher in this Twenty-first Century than it was in the Twenty Century. Slavonic is rooted in Old Church Slavonic. The Byzantine Catholic People are loosing Slavonic as a shared common language, however its liturgical form is well preserved. The liturgical uses of the Byzantine-Greek rite, the Byzantine-Georgian rite and the Byzantine-Slavonic rite make the preservation of common Slavonic possible. There has been a war on the utilization of common Slavic among Byzantine Catholics since the revolutionary days of Vladimir Lenin. The reason why there has been a war on common Slavonic since the early Soviet days is because the Byzantine Catholics of Russia embraced Socialism that was in opposition to Communist ideology. This common people's Socialism mostly unnoticed by the Bolsheviks, it was more noticed by those loyal to the Tsarist system. Indeed the Russian Orthodox Church persecuted Byzantine Catholic Trade Unions before the Bolshevik October Revolution happened. When Vladimir Lenin took power the persecution only worsened. When the Bolsheviks attacked these Byzantine Catholic Trade Unions they did so by assimilating them into the dreadful Soviets forcing the Byzantine Catholics into silence. Byzantine Catholic Trade Unions also lacked the organization skill and cultural consciousness that the Jewish Labor Bund had. With the loss of the political literature of the Byzantine Catholics of Russia these Byzantine Catholics went underground. Then the Byzantine Catholics of the Melkite Greek Catholic Church suffered from the rising Pan-Arab Nationalism that was imposed by Western Enlightenment Values. Capitalists and Communists can claim to be archenemies all they want yet it is ironic that common Slavonic is the enemy of the Communists just as much as the Capitalists. Byzantine Catholics suffer from Cultural Genocide carried out by Western Domination something that Roman Catholics of great influence to this day mostly ignore.

The second factor to grasp is the Byzantine Catholic family connections to other Eastern Christians both those Catholic and those Orthodox. This second factor is directly connected to the first factor.
The Byzantine Catholic family connections to other Eastern Christians is held together by the five liturgical traditions of the twenty-three Eastern Catholic Churches, including the Alexandrian Rite, the Armenian Rite, the Byzantine Rite, the East Syriac Rite, and the West Syriac Rite. The Alexandrian Rite is a liturgical rite of the Byzantine Catholic Church that is also utilized by the Coptic Orthodox Church of Alexandria, Eritrean Orthodox Tewahedo Church and Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church. The Armenian Rite is a liturgical rite of the Georgian divisional sector of the Byzantine Catholic Church that is also utilized by both the Armenian Apostolic and Armenian Catholic Churches. The Byzantine Rite, also known as the Greek Rite, Byzantine-Greek rite or Constantinopolitan Rite is a liturgical rite of the Byzantine Catholic Church that is also utilized by the Eastern Orthodox Churches. The East Syriac Rite or East Syrian Rite, also called Assyrian Rite, Persian Rite, Chaldean Rite, or Syro-Oriental Rite, is a liturgical rite of the Byzantine Catholic Church that is also utilized by the Assyrian Church of the East, the Chaldean Church and the Syro-Malabar Catholic Church (it is very important to understand that both the Assyrian Christians and the Chaldean Christians constitute two Nations that are independent from the Byzantine Catholic Nation). The West Syriac Rite or West Aramean Rite, also called Syro-Antiochian Rite, is a liturgical rite of the Byzantine Catholic Church that is also utilized by the Syriac Orthodox Church and the Maronite Church. One of the biggest confusions (so confusing that even Byzantine Catholics have been known to be confused by this) is that not all Eastern Catholics can be called Byzantine Catholics yet all Byzantine Catholics indeed belong to the greater category of Eastern Catholics.

The third factor to grasp is the subcultures of the Byzantine Catholic Culture. This third factor is directly connected to the first factor and the second factor. This factor is still known but the Cultural Genocide to remove this knowledge grows very rapidly. There are six subcultures that make up the broader Byzantine Catholic Culture, they are the Melkite Byzantine Catholic subculture, the Romanian Byzantine Catholic subculture, the Slovak Byzantine Catholic subculture, the Ruthenian Byzantine Catholic subculture, the Ukrainian Byzantine Catholic subculture and the non-affiliated Byzantine Catholic subculture. Remember not to get confused, being a Catholic who practices the Byzantine rite does not qualify someone as Byzantine Catholic. However never be mistaken, the entire Byzantine Catholic Church practices the Byzantine rite.

I have decided to interrupt my self, I lack faith in the reader's ability to keep things in context. 

Do not be afraid, I do this to all of my students. If I wish to make Urban Scholars of those who read this book then I must embrace constant repetition that most find annoying.   

For further necessary repetitive clarification, never forget that not all Catholics who practice the Byzantine rite constitute themselves as being Byzantine Catholic yet every Byzantine Catholic practices the Byzantine rite. I still enchant the Beatitudes in Greek even though I am an Atheist. The capacity to utter the Beatitudes is essential to being a Christian. The Beatitudes are eight blessings recounted by Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount in the Gospel of Matthew. Each is a proverb-like proclamation, without narrative. Four of the blessings also appear in the Sermon on the Plain in the Gospel of Luke, followed by four woes which mirror the blessings. The capacity to utter the Beatitudes is worthless without knowing how to do this in the tradition of the Byzantine rite. The Byzantine rite is essential to Christianity because the Byzantine rite is the Christian rite preformed in Greek, Greek is essential to Christianity because the language of Christianity is Greek not Latin. Latin is the Roman Catholic language, not all Christians constitute themselves as being Roman Catholic. Truly even further necessary repetitive clarification is required to grasp what must follow in this chapter, the correct definition of Catholic is Universal Christian, thus the correct definition of Roman Catholic is Old World Universal Christian yet the correct definition of Byzantine Catholic is Greco-Roman Universal Christian. In case this essential information has not been properly beaten into your head, I am required to get even more redundant than before, otherwise context will get destroyed if not by Vatican oligarchic Pro-Capitalist sickos whom depend on the masses remaining ignorant, the Marxian anti-dialectical Communists whom depend on hiding the correct side of religion will surely wipe this from consciousness or attempt to twist what I have written in order to destroy context: Greek is the universal Christian language, Christianity is based on the Gospels, the earliest version of the written Gospels are in Greek, Latin is the language of the Old World Universal Christians, the Old World Universal Christians belong to a religious tradition that is not cultural, Old World Universal Christian tradition belongs to the broader category of Christianity, Greco-Roman Universal Christians constitute a Nation because they belong to a religious tradition that is cultural, the use of Greek is required by all Christians whether they are upholding this or not, the Old World Universal Christian tradition requires the use of Latin and Greek yet for virtually the entire existence of the Old World Universal Christian Church they only observed the Latin rite rejecting the Byzantine rite, the Old World Universal Christians have in recent times dropped their Latin rite as a requirement which was uniquely theirs, the Greco-Roman Universal Christians have kept the Byzantine rite knowing the importance of Greek to all manifestations of genuine authentic Christianity, the Greco-Roman Universal Christians are not and must never be required to use the Latin rite, the language of the Greco-Roman Universal Christians is Slavonic which is almost dead in its common form yet still exists in the style of the Byzantine-Slavonic rite, the Byzantine rite is Greek in its dominate form but it also comes in at least two subscript forms known as the Byzantine-Slavonic rite and the Byzantine-Georgian rite, the Culture of the Greco-Roman Universal Christians can be divided into six subcultures, the six subcultures of the Greco-Roman Universal Christians share certain traditions with other Eastern Christians, some of these Eastern Christians that share certain traditions with Greco-Roman Universal Christians must be categorized as belonging to Orthodox Christianity, some of these Eastern Christians that share certain traditions with Greco-Roman Universal Christians must be categorized as belonging to Universal Christianity which is not that of the Greco-Roman cultural tradition nor that of the Old World tradition. 

If you understood all of that you are now worthy to read further.

The Melkite Byzantine Catholic subculture has its tradition in the Melkite Greek Catholic Church. The Melkite Byzantine Catholic subculture traces its history to the early Christians of Antioch, formerly part of Syria and now in Turkey, of the First century AD, where Christianity was introduced by Saint Peter. The Melkite Greek Catholic Church is directly related to the Greek Orthodox Church of Antioch. The Romanian Byzantine Catholic subculture has its tradition in the Romanian Greek Catholic Church. The Romanian Greek Catholic Church is part of the Major Archiepiscopal Churches of the Catholic Church that are not distinguished with a patriarchal title. The Romanian Greek Catholic Church shares much of its traditions with that of the Romanian Orthodox Church. The Slovak Byzantine Catholic subculture has its tradition in the Slovak Byzantine Catholic Church. The Slovak Byzantine Catholic subculture is known by many for sharing some of its more important traditions with the Orthodox Church of the Czech Lands and Slovakia, however the history of the Slovak Byzantine Catholic Church is much more deeply intertwined with that of the Byzantine Ruthenian Greek Catholic Church. The Ruthenian Byzantine Catholic subculture has its tradition in the Byzantine Ruthenian Greek Catholic Church. The Byzantine Ruthenian Greek Catholic Church is probably the most culturally aware of the Byzantine Catholic Churches, the use of the Byzantine rite in this Church is known to make people feel like Angels are enchanting with those in any of their Parishes and Cathedrals. The Ruthenian Byzantine Catholic subculture has the strongest connection to the Greek Orthodox Church in comparison to the other Byzantine Catholic subcultures.
The Ukrainian Byzantine Catholic subculture has its tradition in the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church. The Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church shares an almost identical use of language with the Orthodox Church of Ukraine. I have known several members of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church to speak perfect Slavonic, these Byzantine Catholics are so well spoken in Church Slavonic that I was able to converse with several of them in common Slavonic, their aid in restoring Slavonic as the universal language of the Byzantine Catholics will be vital. The non-affiliated Byzantine Catholic subculture has its tradition in Byzantine Catholic Nationality rather than in any of the Byzantine Catholic Churches. I am non-affiliated Byzantine Catholic, most of us who are non-affiliated Byzantine Catholics tend to join in the communities of the Ruthenian Byzantine Catholics or in the communities of the Ukrainian Byzantine Catholics, for me though it is mostly that of the Ruthenian Byzantine Catholics. It is cultural awareness of the Ruthenian Byzantine Catholics that makes me more comfortable to talk more openly and directly about our Byzantine Catholic Nationality. It can be quite difficult talking to Ukrainian Byzantine Catholics about our shared Byzantine Catholic Nationality, I make no generalization, not every Ukrainian Byzantine Catholic I have known is part of the problem I am about to reference. However this problem is common within the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church. Many of the Ukrainian Byzantine Catholics suffer with sectarianism in a fashion that equates to bigotry. One of the problems facing the Byzantine Catholic Nation is the loss of our collective National identity. More than ever before there is a lack of awareness among so many of my fellow Byzantine Catholics, a lack of awareness that we are all part of a Nation. The Jewish Nation is suffering with a very similar problem, the true members of the Jewish Nation reject the Zionist State that is called the State of Israel. The survival of the Jewish Nation is dependent on the rejection of the State of Israel, yet many of these same Jews that oppose Zionism reject the very notion that there even is a Jewish Nation despite so much historical evidence proving the existence of the Jewish Nation. Zionism typically requires a type of Nationalism in order for this hostile ideology to survive. Nationalism is the ideology that was founded upon the lies of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. Marxists embrace the lies of  Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, they do this despite all the evidence showing how incorrect Hegel's work is, but Marxists can not help themselves embracing the lies of Hegel assists Marxists in their need to justify assimilating the World into their eurocentric Humanism. Anyone expressing themselves to a Marxist can be written off by that Marxist as a dirty Nationalist attempting to cause separation throughout the World.Nationalism fuses Nation with State and this is just as much a problem in society as Capitalism. Be warned the Marxist Endgame can not fix the issues of Nationalism. Marxism as a ideology alone causes Nationalists to become stronger. It was not Capitalism that defeated the Communists, it was Nationalism that defeated the Communists. The defeat of the Communists has led so many to reject Socialism entirely. I blame the Communists for the popular denunciation of Socialism. Many of the Ukrainian Byzantine Catholics in Ukraine do not see themselves as Byzantine Catholics, they see themselves merely as Ukrainians who attend the services of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church. It just so happens that the Ukrainian Byzantine Catholics are both Byzantine Catholic and Ukrainian.It is rather common to have more than one Nationality. There are four factors to Nationality. The four factors to Nationality are Religiosity, Ethnicity, Culture and Politics.The Ukrainians are a Nation based on Culture and Ethnicity. The Byzantine Catholics are a Nation based on Culture and Religiosity. Some factors constituting integral essence contradict yet some factors constituting integral essence find grand compatibility. No one can be of two religions, to claim two religions is a contradiction. Be not mistaken, to be of two cultures and/or of two ethnicities holds no contradiction whatsoever. Applying politics to any of this is rather non sequitur, if you have read the last chapter you know what I mean. In case you did not notice I have finished the subject of subculture, it is important to bombard this chapter with the next topic that I have managed somehow to already start: the importance of Culture to the context of Nationality.

In certain cases a Nation is constituted of the two factors, Culture and Religion. In certain cases a Nation is constituted of the two factors, Culture and Ethnicity. When a Nation is constituted by the three factors, Culture, Religion and Ethnicity this is called a Folk Nation, the greatest example of a Folk Nation is that of the Armenians. In certain cases a Nation is constituted of the two factors, Culture and Politics; such a Nation is weaker than the first three described. In certain cases a Nation is constituted of the two factors, Religion and Ethnicity; such a Nation is weaker than the first four described. In certain cases a Nation is constituted of the two factors, Religion and Politics; such a Nation will be even weaker than the first five described.

I am unsure if a Nation can be constituted of Ethnicity and Politics, I do not know of any examples of this. Likewise I do not know of any Nation built upon Religion, Ethnicity and Politics.

There are five examples of Nations that are based upon Culture and Politics. Russia, America, Canada, Quebec and the nameless Nation that is collectively guilty of identity theft that calls itself Israel.

Russia is not a ethnic group, Russia is not a religious group. Russia historically had been a Country that was filled (still is) with many ethnic groups and religious groups. Russian Culture emerged before Russian Politics emerged. The emergence of Russian Culture grew out of the struggle against feudalism and Monarchy. Russian Politics was born when Autocratic Monarch Nicholas II surrendered his Crown. Russia is still a very well developed Culture, however Russia is loosing its National character because the Nationalism of Russia today is hollow and full of divided politics. I am very Anti-Communist, but that does not mean I am against Soviet Political Thought, I am more Russian in National terms than any Russian Nationalist.

I require that any Urban Scholar to define America in these words "America is a word that means different things to different people" then when you have given that much thought understand that Americanism has already damned America. Any decent American must prepare for America to end. All attempts to save America is treason against the Constitutional values that should have been forced upon Europe rather than hidden behind in order to justify robbing the indigenous Natives of this land that most Americans call America. Next I require any Urban Scholar to say "It is irrelevant what America could have been, it only matters what it is" this is hard for almost anyone identifying with American Constitutionalism. American Constitutionalism is a Social Religion without religiosity and thus it is actually political. Being religious without having religiosity is a political characteristic not a religious trait. When a person religiously defends Capitalism in the name of Protestantism this is an economic trait not a religious characteristic. Politics is formed to act as a matter of determination, this is the POWER POLITIC, this is why politics is the weakest factor in Nationality. This is because politics is a means not an ends. Economy is relations of exchange, this makes it too a means not an ends. Religiosity is a matter of Orientation, you can never be rid of it. Ethnicity exists and most likely will always exist, attempting to kill ethnicity is Genocide, attempting to force all ethnic groups into one eurocentric assimilated melting pot whether through Americanism or Communism is Cultural Genocide. American Constitutionalism was a wasted opportunity, it is time to let it go and fight the ugly monster that is Americanism. The American Culture is a Culture of dreamers, this dream is going to die as it becomes more and more nightmarish. The American Nation is defined by a Dreaming Culture of Tomorrow; waiting for a day that will never come. The American Nation is also defined by a Political movement for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Americanism has already defied and destroyed American Constitutionalism, as this political factor is destroyed by the reality that most Americans wish to ignore America will be rendered a Culture that lacks anything more than a nightmare thus ending even the American Culture.

Canada was originally just a Colonial Country just as New Zealand and Australia. But the Counter-Culture that grew out of the 1960s changed this, the immigrants that came to Canada during World War II became the most important dissenting voices during this time of Counter-Culture and the Social Democratic Politics merged together forming the Canadian Nation. This means that Canada is a new Nation, for most of Canada's history they did not constitute a Nation despite their historical revisionism that bases this fiction on Nationalism, a Nationalism which was not always felt by all the provinces and territories. Canada has been known for the most part to pride it self as being not so hostile unlike America. But at least there are two versions of America. The American Superstate that preaches a false continuity starting with Plymouth Rock to Manifest Destiny that goes further into the Terror War that hides behind the excuse of the events of September 11th of 2001; this is the America guided by the Americanists. The actual American Nation which is based on Dreaming Culture of Tomorrow known as American Constitutionalism and Political movement for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, this is the second version of America; the actual American Nation. On the other hand the American Nation did not truly exist before World War II because American Constitutionalism didn't exist until just after World War II. American Constitutionalism is a ideology that reinterprets the Bill of Rights in order to start a movement for freedom and democracy; even though it was written to protect the liberty of Aristocrats who did not want to pay taxes to British Monarchy. I myself agree with American Constitutionalism; but the dream is over none the less. So truthfully the American Nation is not that much older than the Canadian Nation. Furthermore the truth about America's history is more closer to the false continuity starting with Plymouth Rock to Manifest Destiny; this means that America is more of a Colonial Country than Canada despite how the apart this is from the American Nation it self. The Canadian Nation will outlive the American Nation; yet Canadians too will loose their Nationality because their politics is hollow and their Culture is without strong foundation of values. Canadian Socialists and American Socialists both have the duty to restore North America to the indigenous.

Quebec has always been a Nation. The primary threat to the Nation of Quebec is not the Canadian oppressors. The primary threat to the Nation of Quebec is the Nationalists trying to turn Quebec into a Nation-State. The Culture of Quebec is a Bohemian Culture. I am not referring to a resident of Bohemia; I am referring to Bohemianism. Bohemianism is the practice of an unconventional lifestyle, often in the company of like-minded people and with few permanent ties. It involves musical, artistic, literary or transcendent pursuits. In this context, Bohemians may or may not be wanderers, adventurers, or vagabonds. Quebec's Culture of Bohemianism is not shared by the ruling class of Quebec. The ruling class of  Quebec has French Colonial pursuits. Ruling classes that subject the poor cannot belong to a Nation. The State cannot exist without some group ruling over the masses. The Nation of Quebec is also based on the Political collective will of the Common People who identify with the National identity of Quebec; this is more honest than being American or Canadian.

The Citizens of the Zionist-State usually coming from Jewish background falsely refer to themselves as Israeli. This group of people who call themselves Israelis are engaging in an Antisemitic plagiarization of the Jewish Nation that is collectively known to be Israel which is all over the World, this is also a racist insult to the Palestinians who actually happen to be ancient Israelis. This nameless group of people were originally made up of several displaced Jews most who were survivors of the Holocaust. This group of mostly terrified refugees became the victims of a Neocolonialist project to assimilate all Jews into Zionism and remove the indigenous Palestinian Nation from the land. During the 1960s the nameless people whom continue to this day to be indoctrinated into the Zionist ideology began their own resistance movement to build their own Culture outside of the Nationalist ideology of Zionism; this is an artistic Culture of Al-Andalusian Hebraic poets. The political resistance against Zionism within the Zionist-State is a Pan-Hebraic Socialist movement. But this Pan-Hebraic Socialist movement will not last unless it surrenders the Sovereignty back to the Palestinians. This Pan-Hebraic Socialist movement will fail unless it gives it self a Levant name that is not Judah, that is not Israel. This Pan-Hebraic Socialist movement needs to include in its aims National-Cultural Autonomy for themselves instead of simplistic Post-Zionist Nationalism. This nameless Nation is based on Culture and Politics; having nothing to do with religiosity or ethnicity. I can see over time a coalition of Jews all over the World banning together with Palestinians to remove this nameless Nation, if that happens they will be rendered a Culture that will have to either revert back to Judaism and in humiliation surrender their children to wise Rabbis or become nameless wanderers.

Politics is the weakest factor to be part of what constitutes a Nation. Culture is the strongest factor to be part of what constitutes a Nation. Culture by it self can not constitute a Nation. Yet when Culture is joined with either Religiosity or Ethnicity that Nation has more strength to endure. This is evident throughout history. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel was a plague upon Humanity. National Cultural Autonomy is the only answer to liberate Nations. National-Cultural Autonomy is the collective Cultural rights of a Nation to live without the cohesion of the tyrannical State system. This can be enforced with Soviet Assembly Councils under a World Court that must replace the failure that is the United Nations. Coexistence must replace States, this requires a Socialist economy as well as a rejection of Communist faith in endgames for assimilation and this also requires the permanent removal of Capitalist desires and vices. We can change the World. Together we can end World hunger, even if you believe in God; indeed especially if you do then understand God hates this World of Capitalism versus Communism which is Satan's dominion, the Rapture is not in the Bible - the very notion is Anti-Biblical. As it was written: Little children, it is the end time: and as you've heard that antichrist shall come, currently are there many antichrists; for by this we know that it is the end time. Knowing this how can you deny that the heretical doctrine of the Rapture is an antichrist? I asked a rhetorical question, it is obvious that the heretical doctrine of the Rapture is an antichrist. 

Byzantine Catholics like myself were taught that this is a message to all generations, when I believed in God I could never understand how anyone could believe in the heretical doctrine of the Rapture, of course it is clear to me now that the doctrine of the Raputure is an excuse for not resisting evil. Oddly I have a more clear understanding of evil as an Atheist than I did as a believer. Evil is when one Human lacks empathy for another Human. In a larger context evil is cultural indifference. Let us together destroy cultural indifference with coexistence. National Cultural Autonomy NOW!!!