Saturday, April 27, 2019
Saturday, April 13, 2019
Chapter 13
Chapter13, Dialectical Reciprocity
Dialectical Reciprocity is the synthesis between Dialectical materialism and Reciprocity without the linear historical materialism which is proven to be historical revisionism on par with holocaust denial. Dialectical Reciprocity rejects both holocaust denial and linear historical materialism. Reciprocity is a process of exchanging things with other people in order to gain a mutual benefit. The rule of reciprocity, is a social ethic where if someone does something for you, you then feel obligated to return the favor which stands in contrast to both Nationalism and Communism. If we lived by the rule of reciprocity, children would learn to share with each other, take turns, and engage in reciprocal actions. Instead the rule of competition is the daily bread of most children. Hostility is the norm of society now that Capitalism has defeated Communism. Dialectical materialism is a philosophy of science, history, and nature developed in Europe and based on the writings of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. This concept only became genuinely material with Vladimir Lenin before that Dialectical materialism was no better than Idealism. Marxist dialectics, as a materialist philosophy, emphasizes the importance of real-world conditions and the presence of contradictions within things, limited to class only. This is in contrast to the Leninist dialectic, which emphasizes the observation that contradictions in material phenomena could be resolved by analyzing them and synthesizing a solution whilst retaining their essence. It is also with Leninism that National Struggle became recognized as part of the Revolutionary Process yet there was still a rejection of Jewish Nationality and Byzantine Catholic Nationality. What is needed is Dialectical Reciprocity which also fits into a Theory from the Black Panther Party known as Revolutionary Intercommunalism. Dialectical Reciprocity is the only way to deal with Communists. Communists think that they can argue against real Socialists because they know how to argue with Anarchists and win such pointless irrelevant debates. Debating the Communists is not hard. I have never lost a debate to a Communist. Showing a great deal of Reciprocity towards the various types of Communist is a vain pursuit which in many cases may even get you killed. Marxist-Leninists and Maoists respond the best to Reciprocity. Anarcho Communists only know how to accuse everyone of being Jewish as if that was a crime of some sort. Trotskyists will only belittle anyone who dares to disagree with them. Classical Marxists, Orthodox Marxists and Libertarian Marxists only care about spreading Socialism by using a Communist Nation-State to spread a Communist Empire across the World so that everyone is assimilated into Communism. These Communists are not much better than Trotskyists. Trotskyists still oppose Dialectical Reciprocity. Every time I try to teach young Radicals about Dialectical Reciprocity it is the Trotskyists who resort to pure violence.
Dialectical Reciprocity requires respect and honesty. Dialectical Reciprocity requires acknowledging that the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics saved the World from Nazism while also acknowledging that Joseph Stalin failed to see Adolf Hitler as the primary contradiction until the Nazi invasion of Stalingrad forced him to see otherwise. In the 1930s, a great deal of Communists, Bundists and Social Democrats from Germany and Austria sought refuge from the Nazis in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. These were some of the bravest, most courageous people in history yet the Soviet secret police handed over hundreds of these dissenting voices to the Gestapo. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics’s 1936 constitution afforded “the right of asylum to foreign citizens persecuted for defending the interests of the working people.” But the bureaucracy of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics betrayed their own Constitution when dealing with hundreds of German and Austrian exiles, handing them over to the Nazis from the late 1930s on. Many of the victims were Bundists, given Joseph Stalin's book Marxism and the National Question it should be no shock that Joseph Stalin would let the Nazis deal with his Bundist problem. As bad as this is, Leon Trotsky would have done much worse in all probability doing the same as Adolf Hitler given his victorious attacks on Judaism when he led the Red Army on that Aristocratic Train of Privilege that he commanded from. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics signed a nonaggression pact with Nazi Germany in August 1939. The Wehrmacht invaded Poland a week later. Dialectical Reciprocity requires seeing how flawed Joseph Stalin really was while simultaneously acknowledging that Leon Trotsky was an antisemitic hardliner. Stalin was never equipped to fight antisemitism because he based his entire view of Jews on Lenin's very misinformed aristocratic views of them. Dialectical Reciprocity requires admitting that Stalin – An Appraisal of the Man and his Influence is a Book of Slander with clearly racist undertones which is rather typical of Trotsky's racism towards Georgians. When sourcing such a silly book it lacks foundation much like most of Trotsky's work. The more that Leon Trotsky slandered Joseph Stalin the more it became obvious to Stalin that Trotsky's exile was not enough. This is why Trotsky got the Ice-pick. Having all of this awareness comes to Demarchist lips all the time yet this causes both Trotskyists and Marxist-Leninists to find themselves in a bit of a emotional state of being, thus derailing any honest conversation so be warned. Marxist-Leninists act like you are crazy when you point out to them that Joseph Stalin was in favor of the creation of a Zionist State, sure he regretted this but regrets don't abolish Zionism. Trotskyists should not even be approached as they are all scum. Trotskyists surround Abraham Weizfeld. Abraham Weizfeld is the last Bundist. Marek Edelman is called the last Bundist. To say that Marek Edelman is a Bundist at all is just a lie. If telling the truth still holds value than it needs to be said that Marek Edelman used to be a Bundist but is now just a Liberal. The last Bundist is Abraham Weizfeld not Marek Edelman. It would be a taxing challenge to reach Abraham Weizfeld, he has very intellectually dishonest views on Joseph Stalin and Leon Trotsky. One conversation with me and Abraham Weizfeld would realize that Stalin was merely a fool while Trotsky was tyrannical. Unfortunately for me I can not make this virus slow down. I also happen to know that as great as Abraham Weizfeld is he can never get away from the Anarcho Communists and Trotskyists who have spooked him. As it stands Abraham Weizfeld is without Comrades. I am the Comrade of the last Bundist but he does not have any awareness of me. I have tried now for twelve years to get in touch with Abraham Weizfeld but I never get anywhere. Maybe I am not going through the correct channels. Abraham Weizfeld has known such individuals as Mohammed Abdel Rahman Abdel Raouf al-Qudwa al-Husseini and Muammar Muhammad Abu Minyar al-Gaddafi. Dialectical Reciprocity requires recognizing Abraham Weizfeld while denouncing Marek Edelman.
Dialectical Reciprocity requires having a decolonizing language. This means saying that Whiteness is a lie. This means recognizing that within the First World it is Black People who have the capacity to overthrow the First World. This means that the First World is a global Bourgeoisie and that the Third World is a global Proletariat. Dialectical Reciprocity is how Demarchy starts thus giving rise to Socialism. Dialectical Reciprocity is more advanced than basic Reciprocity yet this remains unnoticed.
Thursday, April 11, 2019
Chapter 11
Chapter 11, Nationality and Class Struggle
Too many Communists consider Class Consciousness to be a contradiction to National Consciousness never seeing them as both equally valid. Only the Maoists recognize the importance of Nationality and how this can connect to Class. However the Maoists do not recognize Byzantine Catholic Nationality or Jewish Nationality because of Joseph Stalin. Some Maoists are even Pro-Zionist. I was sure that I could get the Maoists to realize the parallels between the Black Panther Party and the Jewish Labor Bund. I had no such luck at all. Maoism never goes all the way. Just because Maoists go further than Marxist-Leninists does not mean they go far enough. Every Maoist out there hates Philosophical Religions like Confucianism and Buddhism. Maoists even consider Satanism to be a Religion despite being that Satanism is a Anti Religion movement that was started by Anton LaVey. There was no Satanism before Anton LaVey. Before the Satanism of Anton LaVey and Michael Aquino the very word Satanic was an insult. Satanism has its roots in eurocentricity not antiquity. There was of course historic Devil Worship which is not religiosity yet like Star Worship and Nature Worship could be seen as closer to religion without actually being religion. Devil Worship, Star Worship and Nature Worship all could be to a great extent considered protoreligious as well as postreligious. Devil Worship had little to no relation to Devils before the rise of Islam. African Devil Worship has evolved due to this yet it remains marginal given that it was a more understandable practice before taking on the Christian and Muslim interpretations of Satan as the Devil. I have concluded that Maoism is without popularity in the United States of America due to its Anti-Americanism. The Anti-Americanism of Maoism is essential to Maoism even though most Maoists in the United States of America have changed their positions regarding this. I am convinced that this is because Maoism just like Abimael Guzmán himself is disingenuous. National Struggles are struggles against Westernism. Communists would find my words to be in opposition to Dialectical Materialism. Their confusion is not my fault nor is it the fault of anyone else but the Communists themselves. The most obvious National Struggle within the First World to pay attention to is the Black National Liberation Struggle. Black People are the descendants of the Slaves stolen from Africa. Unlike the White Nation which does not actually exist, the Black Nation is very real. Five hundred years of non-stop kidnapping then slavery, then Jim Crow, then institutional racism and assimilation into the White Society which paradoxically makes new Movies all the time addressing these issues is where the highest revolutionary potential in the First World will always be. It will take Black People to bring down the First World. 9/11 may have temporarily distracted some Black People but Amadou Diallo is still dead and a few more Amadou Diallos throughout the span of thirty years or so may cause Black People to rise up. I can not provoke any such uprising as I am not Black.
I am merely telling the truth. Blackness is both Class Struggle and Nationality there is no contradiction at all. Although not as intense as Black National Liberation Struggle, both Byzantine Catholic National Liberation Struggle and Jewish National Liberation Struggle matters for Revolution yet the price for both those Jewish and those Byzantine Catholic is to understand that all in the First World should walk behind the Black National Liberation Struggle. To do otherwise shows that there is some type of collective narcissism which insists on watering down the essential part that Blackness has in Revolution.
If the Jewish National Liberation Struggle against the Zionist State is defeated it will spell a new Holocaust for the Jews because they will be blamed for Zionism. Jews all throughout the World are openly showing their opposition to Zionism yet somehow this remains unknown. Byzantine Catholics throughout the World oppose Islamophobia openly yet no one understands why. We reject Islamophobia even though most Muslims throughout the World have now come to blame Christians for everything bad that happens to them. The truth is that Jews throughout the West are censored. So this is why no one seems to know that they reject the Zionist State of Israel. The repression of Byzantine Catholics is a bit more our own fault. It is easy for any of us to reject Islamophobia. It is hard for us to challenge other Christians. This is the simple truth, we have become far too complacent. But we are a Nation too. Our National Liberation Struggle will be one of not just condemning Islamophobia, Judeophobia and Zionism but it will also of confronting our own heretics. It is terrifying to challenge the Ku Klux Klan. It is terrifying to challenge the Christian Zionists. It is terrifying to challenge the Mormons. It is terrifying to challenge the Seventh Day Adventists. It is terrifying to challenge the Messianic Zionists for Jesus. It is terrifying to challenge the Cult of the Rapture. It is terrifying to challenge any kind of Crusade. But we must remove Crusades and Crusaders from the Body of Christ forever, this is where the National Liberation Struggle of Byzantine Catholics truly lives. It is the duty of every Byzantine Catholic to aid the Jews in their National Liberation Struggle against Zionism.
Monday, April 8, 2019
Chapter 10
Chapter 10, World Transcendentalism.
There are those who say that we need Secularism, even though Secularism is a position of bigotry. What the World needs is Transcendentalism, but not the American Transcendentalism that is pathetic and only capable of making everyone believe in the dangerous notion of Metaphysics. We need World Transcendentalism.
Social ethics have to do with social norms, and deviance.
I will use Heteronormality and Pan-normality as examples. Heteronormative social norms depict any lifestyle different to it as a deviance and a damnable offense. The problem here is that history and nature prove that being heterosexual, bisexual, homosexual and asexual are not deviances from sexuality but expressions of it. Pan-normality accepts this fact and is therefore preferable to heteronormality. Pansexuals transcend sexual orientation in the same way the irreligious transcend religiosity. This is why only pan-normality can replace heteronormality. Belonging to a heteronormative society does not mean homophobia is encouraged. Heteronormality however does have systemic issues that leads to bigotry.
Civil ethics are the standards of common community.
One of the most typical and sadly cliche features of a Civil ethic is that it is usually either Libertarian or Totalitarian. Very seldom anymore is a Civil ethic Authoritarian.
Libertarianism means that a individual’s “freedom” can come at the expense of another’s individual liberty. Humanism is not humanitarian. Humans that make themselves the center of everything- unlike humanitarianism, Humanism does not seek to ensure human welfare, rather it promotes human desire over human necessity. Secular Humanism is secularism with humanist characteristics. Thus, as we push for world transcendentalism, the anti-environmentalism of the secularism of the secular human will push those of us fighting for World Transcendentalism to a state of war if we don’t attack first. If we wait too long the environmental state of the world is going to deteriorate to the point where we no longer have a planet to live on. The future of our World literally depends on it.
It is important to note here that a true Matriarchal society never existed. The Amazons are a Greek myth based probably on the Scythians, who had women warriors out of necessity, as the men were often out on long campaigns as they migrated. Even the Minaons may have had a more matrilineal culture than a matriarchal one, as such cultures are existent even to this day. Whatever form of Matriarchy that might come from this toxic Feminism might actually be the oppressive force Feminism claims Patriarchy to be.
Let me here talk about this "Patriarchy" the Feminists rail against so much. The real issue Feminism caused was a prolonging of the Labor Problem. The Labor Problem has never been solved. For the uninitiated, the Labor Problem is the exploitation of the worker by the capitalist class. As wages steadily decline due to inflation and inadequate remuneration for their labor, the worker suffers more each year. Then, as the women joined the workforce, the workforce doubled and women could now be exploited as much as their male counterparts. It was then possible for both the man and woman of the household to be exploited, and it created a band-aid to the Labor Problem.
Every other major problem created by the exploitation of the woman worker is not due to some male conspiracy so much as it is due to the exploitative nature of Capitalism. It is therefore incumbent on the Feminist to address their concerns not from a standpoint of their genitals, but from a standpoint of their inherent class. Capitalism does not care for your genitals, nor your religion, nor your politics unless it can be exploited for monetary gain and to your detriment.
So we can understand that Transcendentalism revokes the idea of imposing one's own ethics, be they social, religious or civil, in favor of accepting that within the greater society of the World, different ethics exist. As stated above, however, being accepting comes with the caveat of some forms of ethics to be intolerable. These intolerable ethics are judged by no other merit or metric except that they conflict directly with the values of Transcendentalism and are either Totalitarian or Libertarian in nature. Each Nation of the world must be allowed to govern their own within the laws of their Nation, regardless of political borders. When a person from one nation commits a crime against a person from another, the Cosmopolitanal Law will apply.
To put this another way, consider that Moral Relativism removes entirely the idea that your Nation's ethics applies to another Nation, but leaves you with no recourse for when another Nation's ethics are Intolerable. World Transcendentalism acknowledges that the Moral Relativist has removed themself from taking action, but considers them spineless for not confronting Totalitarian and Libertarian ethics. There must be a limit and an enforceable standard that transcends and unites all Nations while protecting their autonomy from other Nations.
Secularism intertwines with Feminism and Feminism intertwines with Heteronormality. Feminism also can help Lesbians to an extent yet it adds to their objectification by Heterosexual Men. Feminism is also highly oppressive to Gays like myself, payed Liberal Gay Gatekeepers that get on Capitalist media tend to champion Feminism, they do this at the expense of our further alienation in Heteronormal society. Feminism has never been more powerful than it is now, yet as Feminists gain more and more power already in full control of the Civil ethic of the United States of America and the Continent Europe it becomes more and more accepted as fact without investigation that women are oppressed and that Men are all equally free and this is done and the expense of what Whiteness is doing to the Black Nation and what the First World is doing to the Third World.
The Civil ethic that must replace Feminism needs to be Masculinism. If we fail to correctly challenge the Libertarian folly of Feminism it will become the Totalitarian rule of Matriarchy, whether this Matriarchy will be openly referred to as Matriarchy or whether this Matriarchy will still call it self Feminism is unclear to me, I only know we need to prevent this, we can not prevent this with outdated Patriarchy. Patriarchy must be upgraded to Masculinism. I am openly a Gay Masculinist. Masculinism is for Men and Women, unlike Feminism which is only for Women. But let us not get this confused with the reactionary Men's Rights Movement (MRM) which hijacked the just cause of the Men's Movement. The Men's Movement openly used the word Masculinist which the Men's Rights Movement barely uses at all anymore. I will need to explain what Masculism is before I go any further.
Societal ethics are things that pervade all of society and are far broader.
Secularism is a kind of societal ethic that claims to be inclusive and tolerant of religion, so long as it doesn’t influence politics. The issues here is that most people are motivated politically by their religion. The opposition for the existence of the apartheid state of Israel by the Jews is religiously motivated. In fact, many oppressive Christian laws have passed under the guise of “secularism”. Politics is always colored by the religious orientation of the politician and it is part of personal identity and cannot be separate. It’s therefor necessary that we allow ourselves as a society to transcend the theocratic and irreligious domination over the other in our politics. When the political party can make a religious appeal but espouse secularism all that is happening is a subversion of that religion. If your religion motivates your politics, this kind of sham is easily identified for what it is. Theocratic societal ethics, however, are not always harmful. In fact theocratic societal ethics are somewhat necessary for orthodox groups such as the Jewish Nation and Muslims. This is not to say that we should all embrace theocratic societal ethics, rather that it, unlike secularism, is as least functional in small groups.
The solution, then, is to transcend. Transcending isn’t “rising above” religious motivation, it is understanding that those motivations are for the good of their communities. Where these community goals align and overlap is the job of politics to determine and implement. For we all well know that Secular politics have only benefited Corporatism and the rape of our planet and natural resources. It never has truly benefited people. Therefore we need World Transcendentalism.
There are those who say that we need Secularism, even though Secularism is a position of bigotry. What the World needs is Transcendentalism, but not the American Transcendentalism that is pathetic and only capable of making everyone believe in the dangerous notion of Metaphysics. We need World Transcendentalism.
All society and societies have three basic pillars, Social ethics, Civil ethics and Societal ethics. World Transcendentalism is a societal ethic, but in order to understand it, I must first explain the other two ethics.
Social ethics have to do with social norms, and deviance.
I will use Heteronormality and Pan-normality as examples. Heteronormative social norms depict any lifestyle different to it as a deviance and a damnable offense. The problem here is that history and nature prove that being heterosexual, bisexual, homosexual and asexual are not deviances from sexuality but expressions of it. Pan-normality accepts this fact and is therefore preferable to heteronormality. Pansexuals transcend sexual orientation in the same way the irreligious transcend religiosity. This is why only pan-normality can replace heteronormality. Belonging to a heteronormative society does not mean homophobia is encouraged. Heteronormality however does have systemic issues that leads to bigotry.
Civil ethics are the standards of common community.
One of the most typical and sadly cliche features of a Civil ethic is that it is usually either Libertarian or Totalitarian. Very seldom anymore is a Civil ethic Authoritarian.
Libertarianism means that a individual’s “freedom” can come at the expense of another’s individual liberty. Humanism is not humanitarian. Humans that make themselves the center of everything- unlike humanitarianism, Humanism does not seek to ensure human welfare, rather it promotes human desire over human necessity. Secular Humanism is secularism with humanist characteristics. Thus, as we push for world transcendentalism, the anti-environmentalism of the secularism of the secular human will push those of us fighting for World Transcendentalism to a state of war if we don’t attack first. If we wait too long the environmental state of the world is going to deteriorate to the point where we no longer have a planet to live on. The future of our World literally depends on it.
Realizing just how much cultural genocidal domination that the bigoted nature of Western Evils holds hostage over the collective hive mind of Humanity today, I can see that I have to go off on yet another tangent in order to avoid neglecting context.
Feminism is a type of Libertarianism often overlooked. Its roots lie in the later years of the 19th Century when the European women were offended that the recently freed male slaves potentially had more rights than they did. It could also be considered a form of Maternal Colonialism, as demonstrated by the Temperance Movement and Suffragists. Notice the rights they were fighting for did not apply to women of color. Followed to its logical conclusion, Feminism today is more of a modern kind of Matriarchy than an egalitarian or Civil Rights movement. One does not need to oppress the other when fighting for one's rights. It would be as if Dr King, Jr. had fought for european immigrants and their descendants to be sold into slavery and beaten. Nonsense! Feminism and the rights it claims to fight for are two different things, now.It is important to note here that a true Matriarchal society never existed. The Amazons are a Greek myth based probably on the Scythians, who had women warriors out of necessity, as the men were often out on long campaigns as they migrated. Even the Minaons may have had a more matrilineal culture than a matriarchal one, as such cultures are existent even to this day. Whatever form of Matriarchy that might come from this toxic Feminism might actually be the oppressive force Feminism claims Patriarchy to be.
Let me here talk about this "Patriarchy" the Feminists rail against so much. The real issue Feminism caused was a prolonging of the Labor Problem. The Labor Problem has never been solved. For the uninitiated, the Labor Problem is the exploitation of the worker by the capitalist class. As wages steadily decline due to inflation and inadequate remuneration for their labor, the worker suffers more each year. Then, as the women joined the workforce, the workforce doubled and women could now be exploited as much as their male counterparts. It was then possible for both the man and woman of the household to be exploited, and it created a band-aid to the Labor Problem.
Every other major problem created by the exploitation of the woman worker is not due to some male conspiracy so much as it is due to the exploitative nature of Capitalism. It is therefore incumbent on the Feminist to address their concerns not from a standpoint of their genitals, but from a standpoint of their inherent class. Capitalism does not care for your genitals, nor your religion, nor your politics unless it can be exploited for monetary gain and to your detriment.
So we can understand that Transcendentalism revokes the idea of imposing one's own ethics, be they social, religious or civil, in favor of accepting that within the greater society of the World, different ethics exist. As stated above, however, being accepting comes with the caveat of some forms of ethics to be intolerable. These intolerable ethics are judged by no other merit or metric except that they conflict directly with the values of Transcendentalism and are either Totalitarian or Libertarian in nature. Each Nation of the world must be allowed to govern their own within the laws of their Nation, regardless of political borders. When a person from one nation commits a crime against a person from another, the Cosmopolitanal Law will apply.
To put this another way, consider that Moral Relativism removes entirely the idea that your Nation's ethics applies to another Nation, but leaves you with no recourse for when another Nation's ethics are Intolerable. World Transcendentalism acknowledges that the Moral Relativist has removed themself from taking action, but considers them spineless for not confronting Totalitarian and Libertarian ethics. There must be a limit and an enforceable standard that transcends and unites all Nations while protecting their autonomy from other Nations.
Secularism intertwines with Feminism and Feminism intertwines with Heteronormality. Feminism also can help Lesbians to an extent yet it adds to their objectification by Heterosexual Men. Feminism is also highly oppressive to Gays like myself, payed Liberal Gay Gatekeepers that get on Capitalist media tend to champion Feminism, they do this at the expense of our further alienation in Heteronormal society. Feminism has never been more powerful than it is now, yet as Feminists gain more and more power already in full control of the Civil ethic of the United States of America and the Continent Europe it becomes more and more accepted as fact without investigation that women are oppressed and that Men are all equally free and this is done and the expense of what Whiteness is doing to the Black Nation and what the First World is doing to the Third World.
In retrospect I just did more of a written Montage of the overlapping intertwined issues, it was very necessary, so now I return to the main subject.
The Civil ethic that must replace Feminism needs to be Masculinism. If we fail to correctly challenge the Libertarian folly of Feminism it will become the Totalitarian rule of Matriarchy, whether this Matriarchy will be openly referred to as Matriarchy or whether this Matriarchy will still call it self Feminism is unclear to me, I only know we need to prevent this, we can not prevent this with outdated Patriarchy. Patriarchy must be upgraded to Masculinism. I am openly a Gay Masculinist. Masculinism is for Men and Women, unlike Feminism which is only for Women. But let us not get this confused with the reactionary Men's Rights Movement (MRM) which hijacked the just cause of the Men's Movement. The Men's Movement openly used the word Masculinist which the Men's Rights Movement barely uses at all anymore. I will need to explain what Masculism is before I go any further.
Societal ethics are things that pervade all of society and are far broader.
Secularism is a kind of societal ethic that claims to be inclusive and tolerant of religion, so long as it doesn’t influence politics. The issues here is that most people are motivated politically by their religion. The opposition for the existence of the apartheid state of Israel by the Jews is religiously motivated. In fact, many oppressive Christian laws have passed under the guise of “secularism”. Politics is always colored by the religious orientation of the politician and it is part of personal identity and cannot be separate. It’s therefor necessary that we allow ourselves as a society to transcend the theocratic and irreligious domination over the other in our politics. When the political party can make a religious appeal but espouse secularism all that is happening is a subversion of that religion. If your religion motivates your politics, this kind of sham is easily identified for what it is. Theocratic societal ethics, however, are not always harmful. In fact theocratic societal ethics are somewhat necessary for orthodox groups such as the Jewish Nation and Muslims. This is not to say that we should all embrace theocratic societal ethics, rather that it, unlike secularism, is as least functional in small groups.
The solution, then, is to transcend. Transcending isn’t “rising above” religious motivation, it is understanding that those motivations are for the good of their communities. Where these community goals align and overlap is the job of politics to determine and implement. For we all well know that Secular politics have only benefited Corporatism and the rape of our planet and natural resources. It never has truly benefited people. Therefore we need World Transcendentalism.
Chapter 9
Chapter 9, Demarchy instead of Communism.
Demarchy
Demarchy is not some eurocentric endgame like Communism. Demarchists seek Direct Democracy. Socialism is the road to Direct Democracy. Demarchy is the organic Political Action OF The Now taken in both the First World and the Third World to safeguard organic Socialist movements away from the destructive nature of Communist Endgames which can only be called Cultural Genocide. Most every Communist believes that their theories are universal and thus must be forced on all Socialists. Demarchy is the first step to bringing the World Socialist Revolution about. This Urban Scholar Thesis is an expression of Demarchy. Demarchy is a place of philosophical foundation in flux yet never straying from the theoretical foundation of which Demarchism is truly based upon. I did not invent Demarchy, I have merely given this organic Political Action OF The Now a name. Demarchism is not Libertarian. Demarchism is not Totalitarian. Demarchism is Authoritarian.
Demarchy is the agenda to bring about a government of Direct Democracy with the economy of Proletariat Socialism. Demarchy is the agenda of Demarchists to bring about the Cosmopolitanal laws enforced by the Civil Society with World Transcendentalism replacing the polarizing systems of Theocracy and Secularism. Demarchists in the First World seek to ensure the social norms of Pan-normality instead of the inversions of Tranarchy and Hetero-normality. All Demarchists fight for the recognition of National Cultural Autonomy in a World Federation System that acts as a negotiating Civil World Assembly instead of an overarching State.
I just realized that I have not made it clear the differences between Demarchy and Demarchism all that clear, indeed I most likely caused even further confusion. So now I must explain all this in the most redundant way that I possibly can.
Obviously it is Demarchism which Demarchists adhere to rather than Marxism. Marxism teaches that Socialism is the transition between Capitalism and Communism, such a view is a lie just as Marxism is a lie. Leninism is a correction because Marxism is Idealist, it is with Leninism that Marxism became materially based. Trotskyism is a racist ideology which synthesizes Leninism with Marxism using Anarcho Communist language while attempting to betray every single Anarcho Communist joining the Fourth International. Trotskyism is the only true version of Marxism which is why all true Socialists must denounce Trotskyism.
Demarchism is the Theory and Praxis of Socialists who reject the discredited Communist theories of Assimilation and Cultural Genocide. While many Communists can be called good Socialists they can never be called great Socialists. Demarchism is Methodology not Ideology. The word Demarchist is meant to be a word distancing itself from the words Marxist and Communist. Demarchism has nothing to do with Anarchism whatsoever. Demarchism is the methodology of true Socialists attempting to bring about World Socialist Victory. Demarchists are the true Socialists. Demarchism is the methodology of all true Socialists. Demarchism is organic uncompromising Socialist theory and praxis.
Demarchy is Action. Demarchy is the first phase of World Revolution. Demarchy is the actions taken by Demarchists who wish to bring about Socialism. Demarchy has been done twice before. When Muammar Muhammad Abu Minyar al-Gaddafi fought for the People of Libya so that they could later create the Jamahiriya, this was Demarchy. When the great Socialist Revolutionary Hugo Rafael Chávez Frías attempted to Coup D'état the American controlled Government of Venezuela this was Demarchy.
Now that I have explained the difference between Demarchism and Demarchy I can better explain.
Demarchy is the audacity to start a plan of long drawn out actions to undermine Western Values. Communists lack the historical insight necessary to overcome their own idealisms. Demarchy manifests uniquely wherever it is attempted. Communists seek to bring about Communism after enough States have become like the Capitalist Country of China which makes no sense yet this is where they stand. Writing this Thesis which will no doubt be boycotted by Academics is blatant Demarchy. This Thesis may not be as glorious as Muammar Muhammad Abu Minyar al-Gaddafi overthrowing Italian Colonizers but nevertheless writing this Thesis is an action which constitutes Demarchy. Demarchy is daring to formulate a correct enough Theory that works in real life. Demarchy is daring to think outside of Marxism when planning to build Socialism. Demarchy is not the goal. Demarchy is the first step towards World Revolution. Demarchy becomes Civil Disobedience. Civil Disobedience becomes Revolution. The only Revolution which matters is Socialist Revolution Worldwide. The goal is Direct Democracy not Communism. World Socialist Victory brings us to Direct Democracy. Direct Democracy is the Endgame not Communism. Demarchy is a rejection of mass entertainment. Entertainment is the opiate of the masses. Demarchy is the action of showing how Religion is innately geared towards Socialism when agitating for Socialism to the masses. Karl Marx was a self-hating Jew and a self-hating Lumpenproletariat funded by his Capitalist benefactor Friedrich Engels the Hegelian, his work amounts to very little in Modern life. This is a quote from Karl Marx showing how dishonest he was;
Religious distress is at the same time the expression of real distress and the protest against real distress. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, just as it is the spirit of a spiritless situation. It is the opium of the people. The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions.
This is all a lie. This is a bigoted disregard for Orientation. So I am going to fix the words of Karl Marx;
Spectator distress is at the same time the expression of real distress and the protest against real distress. Entertainment is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, just as it is the spirit of a spiritless situation. It is the opium of the people. The abolition of entertainment as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions.
Do you see what I just did? My accurate correction of Karl Marx is Demarchy. Now you go and do the same. Bring some Demarchy to the World.
Chapter 8
Chapter 8, What is Patriotism?
I need to explain what Patriotism is and what it is not. Patriotism is love, loyalty, devotion and sense of attachment to a Country recognizing it as his or her homeland. Patriotism is also the fellowship of citizens who share the same devotion to their Country. Patriotism is not national pride except in the case of National Patriots. Patriotism is not Nationalism yet it is not a mere attachment to Territory either.
I must start with some basics.
Country should not be confused with Territory. There are several factors that can identify Territory but the most basic concept of a Territory is an area of land under the jurisdiction of collective ownership. All the factors that constitute a Territory are the same as all the factors that constitute a Country.
#1 A Country is a Sovereign land.
#2 A State is defined by a Government's estate of a Country.
#3 A Nation-state(this system is known as Nationalism) is when the State is fused with the Nation.
The earliest version of Statehood is Oligarchy. It is worth pointing out that not all Kingdoms can be called Monarchies. To make it even more difficult for the eager student, Country should not be confused with Territory. Unlike a Country, a Territory is without Sovereignty. Sovereignty does not mean Lords and Serfs. Royalty does not mean Monarchy or Autocracy. Nobility does not mean Aristocracy. The assumption that allows for these notions to get confused with each other is called eurocentricity.
It occurs to me that I have to go into a tangent just to deprogram you.
Let me start with the differences between the forms of Non-State Sovereignty.
#1 Monumental Sovereignty. A Sovereign Monument is a locational object which is considered sacred either symbolically and/or literally. The most ancient Sovereign Monument is not even Man made, I am of course referring to a Mountain. This concept can be expanded to a River or even a Fortress.
#2 A Constitutional Sovereignty. This is the most correct form of Sovereignty because it can be upheld by all Citizens of the Country without everyone having to visit the locational object.
#3 Royal Sovereignty. This is typically known as a Kingdom. There are no more Kingdoms because in a Kingdom the Kings and the Queens must answer to Scholars, Priests, Shamans and/or Court Clerics. In a Kingdom the Scholars, Priests, Shamans and/or Court Clerics can de-thrown a Royal Ruler handing Sovereignty to someone else.
#4 Noble Sovereignty. This is a much lesser discussed version of Sovereignty common in Tribalism and Theocracy. This system of Sovereignty arises out of the merit of deeds. Nobility can only be passed by a Noble to his or her children by giving them hands on training in governance. A Kingdom can also be built on Noble Sovereignty. There is nothing stopping a King or Queen from being a Noble rather than a Royal.
Now I will get to the differences between the forms of State Sovereignty.
#1 Monarch Sovereignty. This is typically called Monarchy or Autocracy. This is when the King or Queen but usually King takes the Country as his entire estate of property thus owning the people on it as well. This requires Sovereign Social Overreach defining Government's estate of a Country into the landowning Statehood. Monarch Sovereignty is actually much newer than people think. Monarchy did not exist anywhere in history except in China, that is until Europe replicated this tyrannical system. European Monarchy and European Autocracy is where Capitalism first emerged as a economic system.
#2 Imperial Sovereignty. This is typically known as an Empire. This is a form of Oligarchy more than it it is a form of Monarchy. However Empire can be under Monarchic control or oligarchic control depending on what causes an Empire to form in the first place. This is when
the King or Queen takes the role or maybe even title of Emperor or
Empress. This expansionist position takes the Power of Statehood. Make
no mistake an Empire is a State. Empire is the estate of regional
hegemony.
#3 Oligarch Sovereignty. This is typically called Oligarchy. This is the earliest version of Statehood. Oligarchy is the rule of a few in power. Oligarchy in antiquity has made Royal families and Noble families dynastic, this is the foundation of Class Division. In the history of antiquity there have been other ways that Statism arose but this is the most common and repetitive in the history of antiquity.
#4 Feudal Sovereignty. This is typically called Feudalism. Feudalism with the exceptions of Europe and China this system of Statehood was much less repressive than Oligarchy. Both in Europe and China this form of Statism is severely repressive. In the Asian Feudal States with the exception of China, Feudalism was not as tyrannical. As long as the poor classes of society did not oppose the Feudal lords and Feudal ladies. The Feudal lords and Feudal ladies did not typically repress their subjects. Contrary to popular belief Free Trade was common in these Feudal States. Theocratic welfare and even Theocratic Socialism on a local level was even possible within the Asian Feudal States. This however does not mean that Feudalism was desirable in Asia. This only means that Feudal life was more content in Asia than it was in Europe. The European Feudal States were under the indirect control of the Roman Catholic Church, the only local welfare came from the Church and there was never any Theocratic Socialism. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels threw away the historical facts in favor of a revisionist narrative, they made it seem like local equality was to be found in these places because they had repressive Communes that provided no equality on a local level in any way, shape or form. Feudal Commune living was very miserable and overbearing, every Married Couple could at least expect to loose one Child. The cost of getting Married was often not attainable in these Feudal Communes. Commune living does not always mean equality, this alone should be enough to become suspicious of the very word Communism but alas, it is more likely in their typical emotionalism and their typical Marxian Idealism that the Communists will cling on to the word Communism even more so.
#5 Feudal Imperial Sovereignty. This is typically called Feudal Imperialism. This is when a Feudal State becomes an Empire. This happened in both Europe and Asia a lot, usually because of the desire for material possession. This was more terrifying in Europe than in Asia. Feudal Imperialism in Europe is what would give way to Monarchism.
#6 National-Tyrannical Sovereignty. This is typically called Nationalism. Nations sought independence from Monarchies by declaring their independence from the Monarchic States with Nationalism. Most of the Nations of the World did not benefit from Nationalism. Nationalism is when the Nation is fused with the State, this causes assimilation of marginalized Nations with in the Host Nation socially dominating the State, this is an ingenious form of State repression.
The Tangent is over and I am happy to have deprogrammed you.
Patriotism
Patriotism does not contradict National-Cultural Autonomy. Patriotism is organic to those loyal to their Country. Nationalism is what corrupts Patriotism. Patriotism is the deepest loyalty a person can have when fighting off invasion. This is what makes British Nationalism such a mockery to proud Celts, there can be no Patriotism to being something as Colonial and as Nationalist as being White enough to say "I'm British" because it is pure assimilation. Patriotism is the People's political power of collectivist mutual aid. Patriotism is loyalty to the point of dissent against the Government in the name of the Civil Society. Patriotism requires feeding the Country, protecting the ecological environment, ensuring fairness to all who are part of the Country. Anyone calling themselves a Patriot must come to realize that the only economy that can set all Countries free is Socialism. Demarchists knowing that religiosity is a matter of orientation just as Homosexuality versus Heterosexuality is a matter of orientation need to make the appeal to the World. Socialism is not about trivializing faith, family and home. Socialism is about collective community power and stable economy. Patriotism and Socialism have no contradiction.
National Patriotism
National Patriotism is the Patriotism of National Countries. If we remove the notion of the State, we can from there safely say that there are Non-National Countries and that there are also National Countries. National Patriotism is in Cuba. Actually if I was to be truly honest with you. National Patriotism is a word that has a Non-Demarchist definition but that definition is not dialectical to the word's sake. Hence I will give no reference to the Non-Demarchist definition here. National Patriots tend to embrace Socialist economy. Fidel Castro is more of a National Patriot than a Communist. Che Guevara was a hardcore Communist. Che was so Communist that his Marxism contradicted Castro's National Patriotism. Che Guevara had no strategy other than fighting Revolution all by himself all over the World. Che Guevara was responsible for the Communist usage of the reactionary term "pan-americanism" even though he was not the one who coined this reactionary term. The Mexica Movement has correctly discredited the term "pan-americanism"yet several White Communists in their Neocolonial behavior keep objecting to decolonizing dialectics nevertheless. White Communists are just as bad as White Supremacists on these matters. In some instances White Communists are actually worse. White Communists have been actively sabotaging and belittling the Mexica Movement since 1992. Olin Tezcatlipoca has had only slanderous harassment from such Communists never any solidarity. Communists don't know how to show Solidarity to anyone except for other Communists and even then this is not so. Communists love to attack other Communists. Never again can the Communists be allowed to make Western historically revisionist claims. Communists hold a greater threat to National Patriotism than even Capitalists. At least the Capitalists can unite an entire population against them. Communists on the other hand don't know how to keep preserving National Patriotism even when they understand that it is essential. The theoretical foundations from the old Jewish Bund with Abraham Weizfeld's theoretical expansion and the work by Chris Hedges on Religion can be understood as being part of the basic theoretical soil of Demarchism. The Mexica Movement needs support. Along with the Jewish Bund, Weizfeld and Hedges, the Mexica Movement also has everything to do with the theoretical soil of Demarchism. National Patriotism is the Patriotism of National Countries which can be the greatest weapon against Colonialism if kept away from the Communist mindset which itself is also Colonial.
Cosmopolitanal Patriotism
Cosmopolitanal Patriotism is when you are loyal to another Country for political, cultural or reasons of belonging to a diaspora. Having loyalty to a Country you do not live in can seem taboo yet I assure you that it is ethical too. I know Mexicans who are loyal to Mexico yet they are Citizens of the United States of America. This loyalty of theirs can be called Cosmopolitanal Patriotism as well as National Patriotism. I should mention that their loyalty to Mexico is only by default. What they really held loyalty to was the Liberation Movement of Aztlan. So the loyalty to Mexico expressed was limited. The loyalty to Aztlan by these disenfranchised Mexicans to Mexico was secondary to their loyalty to Aztlan. Cosmopolitanal Patriotism is always patriotism for a different Country, the exception to this is of course the Indigenous. Indigenous Cosmopolitanal Patriotism can be found in the Mexica Movement as well as many Navajos and Hopis in Arizona. Many of the Indigenous Mexicans rejecting the term Mestizo uphold a stance for Indigenous Cosmopolitanal Patriotism, this is the Mexica Movement which is far more advanced than any Communist organization. The very hip and informative Mexica Movement expresses a Indigenous Cosmopolitanal Patriotism for the new decolonized Cemanahuac. Cemanahuac would be all of the land called by Westerners the "americas" under the control of the Indigenous. Communists find this offensive because for them to ever admit that their Western views have never been nor will they ever be revolutionary is too much for their Hegelian dogmatic faith. Cosmopolitanal Patriotism is a near-perfect counter to Capitalist and Communist reaction. Whenever the Marxists show themselves as the cosplayers that they really are this tends to confuse the growing hungry-homeless youth in the United States. Out of this confusion they turn to Anarchism. After they have turned to Anarchism they destroy their records and stay off grid. I live off grid myself, but I have ways of securing my living arrangements. The same can not be said for these Anarchists. Demarchism is necessary because Anarchists offer no solution to the Communist insanity which is Marxism. There are Anarchists for Capitalism as well as Anarchists for Communism. Anarchists are worse than Communists. Anarchists can never even hold their own in an argument against a single Communist. This is not good, the Communists will lead us into assimilation and cultural genocidal politics if we do not oppose them. The growth of Anarchism is the fault of Marxists. The Soviet Union is gone, China has lost anything that can be called Socialist. Marxists live in the past and they lack appealing ways to bring people to Socialism. Communists have not proven that Communism works. They have only proven that Socialism works. Cosmopolitanal Patriotism is beyond the comprehension of all Communists.
Patriotic Nationalism
Patriotic Nationalism is the tactic of Patriotic Nationalists. Patriotic Nationalism is also a transitional strategy to bring us closer to Socialism. Patriotic Nationalists are Demarchists with the aim of deconstructing Nationalism along with Capitalism. Within the First World it is Patriotic Nationalism that will separate Nationalism from Patriotism. If genuine Revolutionary Socialists are not willing to remove Marxism from the Socialist lexicon then the result will be a fully pure Anti-Socialist Globe. The result of which must never be allowed. Within the Third World the role of Patriotic Nationalism is different. Third Worlder Patriotic Nationalists highlight the best parts of Marxism then throw away the rest. The parts of Marxist theory that are kept within Patriotic Nationalism give Third World Patriotic Nationalism a sort of pseudo-New Democracy feel to it. Third Worlder Patriotic Nationalists are very popular in that place in the World we like to call the Middle East. The Terror-war carried out by the United States and its lackeys is shifting everything at a very rapid rate. In the devastated Country of Iraq the Patriotic Nationalists join in both Communist and Nationalist Parties attempting to teach Demarchism. I don't think that the Iraqi Patriotic Nationalists are going to win many people over. Communism and Nationalism both offer instant results and in a devastated Country that can be very appealing. It is actually the Islamic Republic of Iran where Patriotic Nationalism is most likely to be used. Qasem Soleimani is a friend of mine in Iran and what he teaches is Patriotic Nationalism. Iran is one of the only places where Socialism can come without violence. National-Cultural Autonomy is in the Islamic Republic of Iran. This means that the policies of Iran and the Government of Iran hold more capacity for Socialism than any of the Nationalist and Communist Parties in Iran. Qasem Soleimani is a hero. Marxists have no interest in a Modern Hero because such Heroes will never be Communists.
Sunday, April 7, 2019
Chapter 7
Chapter 7, Cosmopolitanality.
In order to be a good Socialist, you must not be an Anarchist. Anarchism is not a correct alternative to Marxism. In fact not all Anarchists are Socialist. Demarchism is the cure to the insanity of Anarchism and the correct answer that is unrealized due to the folly of Marxism. But in this chapter I need to explain Cosmopolitanality otherwise Demarchism will have no context to either Trade or Socialism.
In order to be a good Socialist, you must not be an Anarchist. Anarchism is not a correct alternative to Marxism. In fact not all Anarchists are Socialist. Demarchism is the cure to the insanity of Anarchism and the correct answer that is unrealized due to the folly of Marxism. But in this chapter I need to explain Cosmopolitanality otherwise Demarchism will have no context to either Trade or Socialism.
Cosmopolitanality is the Social Politic where the Cosmopolitan understands he or she exists in a world of the other. The other may have differing social norms, religiosity, sexual orientation, it is the duty of the Cosmopolitan to co-exist with the other, and be part of their world to the extent that unity and alliance and cooperation requires. Cosmopolitanal values are worldwide values,
Cosmopolitaniality should not be confused with Corporatism or Globalism. Cosmopolitaniality is apposed to BOTH Marxism and Free Enterprise.
Cosmopolitanality is NOT Communism.
Cosmopolitanality is NOT Capitalism.
It would make no sense to say Gays, Lesbians and Bisexuals require National Cultural Autonomy. But orientation in the context of religiosity as well as in the context of sexuality requires a level of autonomy, this autonomy is Cosmopolitanality. Cosmopolitanality is the Human Autonomy of all human groups and it exceeds borders. Cosmopolitanality is not something that can be granted through legislation. Cosmopolitanal law is needed right now, today. This is necessary to bring about Socialism. Overall any true Cosmopolitan knows how to express Cosmopolitanality, this worldwide tendency of Demarchism in advocacy for Cosmopolitanality refuses to let Corporatism win the heart of humanity. All observers of Cosmopolitanality due to his or her moral conviction exposes the hypocrisy of Globalism.True freedom is liberty. True liberty is autonomy. The average Cosmopolitan needs to be freed from the bounds of borders. Cosmopolitanal law is the execution of this Social Politic, many of us utilize this without even realizing it. It occurs to me that I can not go further into the necessity of Cosmopolitanal law without going into the subjects that have given rise to it.
First I must go on a tangent on how incorrect Marxian language is.
According to Vladimir Lenin the higher stage of Capitalism is Imperialism. I wonder sometimes why Marxists use such misleading language. The higher stage of Capitalism is Corporatism. Imperialism has existed many times throughout history long before there ever was Capitalism. Socialism existed in past epics but Capitalism never truly existed in the past epics, so referring to Imperialism as a higher stage of Capitalism is misleading. I do not know of any Marxists who theorize an even higher stage of Corporatism (the stage of Capitalism that the Marxists call Imperialism) even though it is evident that there is a higher stage of Corporatism. Benito Amilcare Andrea Mussolini probably coined the word Corporatism on purpose because he understood the treachery he was doing. However what he coined as Corporatism would be better defined as Corporate Nationalism. Corporate Nationalism is a political ideology which advocates the organization of society by corporate groups, such as agricultural, labor, military, scientific, or guild associations on the basis of their common interests. This means that Corporate Nationalism is class collaboration in a totalitarian manifestation.
I just realized I have to now interrupt my tangent interruption with another tangent interruption.
I am going to first explain the difference between the Old World and the New World.
I do this as a Old World person, so understand that those indigenous to the New World do not consider themselves of a New World. The Old World is Africa, Asia and Europe. The New World is the Americas ( North, Central and South America ) and Oceania ( Australia continent ). So now that you know this, you can understand that the Old World Order was the Roman Empire. The New World Order is Americanism. Americanism is a form of Corporatism, not all Corporatism has become Globalism. You will need to remember this during this tangent interruption of a tangent interruption, you will need to still remember this once I return you to that prime tangent interruption.
Americanism
Americanism is not just a manifestation of Corporatism. Americanism is also a manifestation of Libertarianism. There are five key features evident to the ideology of Americanism.
#1 The necessity of constant reinvention, attempting to strip away correct identity in favor of false identity. Assimilation is the highest fundamental to Americanists. Americanism requires that all Cultures that come ashore to its frontiers is absorbed by joining into a melting pot that robs organic collectives of their once unique traditions.
#2 Making an aggressive attempt to replace the profoundness of Religion with the meaningless dry amoral attitude of Spirituality. Religion is a barrier to Colonialism, keeping the settler Colonial-Status Quo protected from religious dissent is essential to Americanism.
#3 Anti-Catholicism which in this Century is now Islamophobia. The Catholic Religion stands in contradiction to Freemasonry and Protestantism. The Catholic Religion stands in even greater contradiction to Mormonism which is Americanist Spirituality done in the name of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. Today this Anti-Catholicism has transformed into Islamophobia. Mormonism is a dangerous force that if left unchallenged will inevitably take over the United States of America. The Corporate National Americanist Party could eventually take over the United States of America rather easily, of course if this happens then Americanism will go from Libertarian to Totalitarian, which is the logical conclusion for Americanism. My own painstaking research has led me to the conclusion that half of the National Security Administration is Mormon. It is not too far fetched to believe that through intense manipulation of the Mormons which control the National Security Administration, that the Corporate National Americanist Party could rise as a third Party and overtake the entire Country. Although the Corporate National Americanist Party has never registered as a political party, they may decide that they want to register as a political party that comes as an alternative to the corrupt two party system. With a greater desperation in the United States of America due to any sort of economic crisis it becomes more and more likely that the Corporate National Americanist Party will take over the United States of America.
#4 Americanism is Nationalism. The problem with Nationalism is that it fuses the Nation together with the State. The United States of America since its founding regarded it self as a Nation, with the Hegelian notion of Nationalism, Americanism went from Republicanism to Nationalism. All marginalized Nations imprisoned within the United States thus become oppressed more than before.
#5 Individual pleasure at the expense of collective misery. Americanists love their Apple Pie, Base Ball and Hot Dogs. Individualism destroys the Individual yet it is Collectivism that protects the Individual. Americanism started with William Bradford. The narrative of continuity that starts with Plymouth Rock continuing all the way to Manifest Destiny which is further synthesized by the narrative coming out of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints promotes the Individual right over other Individuals as divine, just and righteous is at the root of Planet Malfunction (Climate Change). All destruction of the truly marginalized in society can be justified by this hyper-individualistic faith in "the self made man" and "doing your own thing" being that this is ordained in such a "Holy Church" of Base Ball where they all sing the hymn of Take Me Out to the Ball Game how is it that America can ever fix it self? The answer is that as long as there is an America, the Earth will be destroyed. Americanism is much to anti-Collectivist to ever allow the Planet to be reforestized. Constitutionalism will inevitably die, because you can not have America without Americanism.
Feminism
Feminism is a manifestation of Libertarianism. Feminism maintains the fallacious position that societies prioritize the male point of view, and that females are treated unfairly within all societies. Feminism is also the Modern reinvention of Matriarchy. Feminism is the most profound manifestation of the reactionary movements that make up the broader category of Libertarianism. The suffragists Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton were some of the most profoundly racist women to have ever lived, it was the White Women with the aid of the Ku Klux Klan that started Feminism to ensure White Women's Rights. Then you have the Neocolonialist idea of Black Feminism which I find to have been one of the weaknesses of the Black Panther Party, a weakness that COINTELPRO surely would have used and probably did. One of the most important properties in Feminism is an agenda for demasculinization of Society. Feminists have always claimed that they want equality, which has never historically been shown. Historically speaking Feminism is about disempowering Men, nothing about this has ever changed.
Anarchism
Anarchism is a manifestation of Libertarianism.
If any of the Anarchists read this they are going to hate me more than they already do. I do not care, I am going to unload reason before I die, so they will either have to ignore me or just deal with how much more I grasp material history than them. A reasonable principled Socialist does not join in the populist whims of claiming that "Anarchy is Order" such statements expose the typical insanity of Libertarian metaphysics. Be warned that what I am referring to has nothing to do with left wing or right wing nor does this have anything to do with centrism.
Totalitarianism is extreme Statism. Libertarianism is extreme individuality to the point of apathy. Libertarianism has been seen before and this is actually what leads to Totalitarianism. Libertarianism allows a individual the freedom to crush another individual's autonomy.
There are many manifestations of Libertarianism. The manifestation of Libertarianism which is most recognized (for what it is) as Libertarianism is Anarchism.
Mutualism was the first of the Anarchist theories, this theory is Capitalism in denial. Mutualism was founded by Pierre-Joseph Proudhon a famous antisemitic troublemaker. Charles Maurras another very well known antisemitic troublemaker drew inspiration from Pierre-Joseph Proudhon. Pierre-Joseph Proudhon was much worse than Karl Marx in his hatred of the Jews. On the date of December 26, 1847 Pierre-Joseph Proudhon wrote in his Journal:
Jews. Write an article against this race that poisons everything by sticking its nose into everything without ever mixing with any other people. Demand its expulsion from France with the exception of those individuals married to French women. Abolish synagogues and not admit them to any employment. Demand its expulsion Finally, pursue the abolition of this religion. It’s not without cause that the Christians called them deicides. The Jew is the enemy of humankind. They must be sent back to Asia or be exterminated. H. Heine, A. Weill, and others are nothing but secret spies ; Rothschild, Crémieux, Marx, Fould, wicked, bilious, envious, bitter, etc. etc. beings who hate us. The Jew must disappear by steel or by fusion or by expulsion. Tolerate the elderly who no longer have children. Work to be done – What the peoples of the Middle Ages hated instinctively I hate upon reflection and irrevocably. The hatred of the Jew like the hatred of the English should be our first article of political faith. Moreover, the abolition of Judaism will come with the abolition of other religions. Begin by not allocating funds to the clergy and leaving this to religious offerings. – And then, a short while later, abolish the religion.
Pierre-Joseph Proudhon was a pure Idealist his ideas seem to be rooted in Metaphysics not Science. Antisemitism is part of Anarchism, Pierre-Joseph Proudhon himself paved the way for Corporate Nationalism and the Fascist trends.
#2 Collectivist anarchism
Collectivist anarchism, the second theory of Anarchism was started by Mikhail Alexandrovich Bakunin. Mikhail Bakunin was also an antisemitic troublemaker, he even considered Karl Marx to be a Moses of his time. Mikhail Bakunin also considered Marxism to be the Jewish counter-revolutionary force holding back Anarchism. Mikhail Bakunin believed that Jewish hegemony over banking and finance was at the root of the modern ills. No such Jewish hegemony existed, Mikhail Bakunin was not one for facts. Facts mean very little to Anarchists, Mikhail Bakunin is a great example of this.
#3 Anarcho Communism
Anarcho Communism sometimes known as Anarcho Syndicalism is the third Anarchist theory. Pyotr Alexeyevich Kropotkin was the originator of Anarcho Communism. Pyotr Kropotkin was a class collaborator and he had a serious problem with Marxists. It is correct to oppose Marxism, but this must be done without lying. Anarcho Communists themselves have no ability to oppose Marxism honestly. The need for Demarchism is most profound when you see just how dishonest Anarcho Communists are as people.
#4 Anarcho Capitalism
Anarcho Capitalism sometimes known as Voluntaryism is the fourth Anarchist theory. There is no actual main founder of this insane theory of utopianism. In an Anarcho Capitalist society, courts and law enforcement, along with all other security services would be operated by privately funded competitors selected by consumers rather than centrally through "confiscatory" taxation. This living hell would somehow not be a hell because of a universally held doctrine that the Anarcho Capitalists believe in called the Non-Aggressive Principle. The Non-Aggressive Principle is a utopian stance asserting that aggression is inherently wrong. In this context, aggression is defined as initiating or threatening any forceful interference with an individual or their property. Ironically the Non-Aggressive Principle is very Pro-Exploitative. The Non-Aggressive Principle promotes the use of violence against workers that strike against bosses, viewing strikes as Aggression.
Republicanism
Republicanism is a manifestation of Libertarianism. Republicanism is the plutocratic ideology which stands in contrast to Monarchism. Having a Republic as a form of Government does not necessarily mean Republicanism. Republicanism is the ideology of Representative Republic. Republicanism is an aggressive form of Statism that by design is against Democracy. A functioning Democratic Republic does not run on Republicanism. Plutocrats are inherently Libertarian because they understand that Monarchy is a Totalitarian threat to their wealth and influence over society. Democratic Republics contradict Republicanism because Democratic Republic is the only correct transition from Representative Republic to Direct Democracy. Direct Democracy is inherently anti-Libertarian and anti-Totalitarian. Direct Democracy can only be Authoritarian. Republicanism like Communism lacks the capacity to distinguish between Authoritarianism and Totalitarianism.
Minarchism
Minarchism is a manifestation of Libertarianism. Minarchism is a ideology which advocates individual liberties under the rule of law with an emphasis on economic freedom (Capitalism). The best example of this Oligarchic notion is the Confederate States of America. Minarchism is a utopian notion, more so than even Anarchism. Minarchism is dependent on a mix of Colonialism and Free Enterprise. The oppression of such a foolish ideology would be so overt that it would never sustain itself in this Century.
Secularism
Secularism is a manifestation of Libertarianism. Core beliefs of Secularists include new ideas—which depart from tradition. Secularism seeks to "liberate" everyone from religion. This is because the Church was seen as so tyrannical in Europe that it is only "logical" to assume the same is true for the Orthodox Churches and the Muslims. Indeed Muslims and the Eastern Churches must be even more tyrannical because they are not White. Secularism is part of Whiteness, it is one of the most fundamental dangers threatening all of Society. When the Non-Whites embrace Secularism this causes Neocolonialism to flourish.
Zionism is not just a manifestation of Neocolonialism. Zionism is also a manifestation of Totalitarianism. There are five key features evident to the ideology of Zionism. There are also two other sub features of Zionism that bring contradiction to Zionism.
Humanism
Humanism is a manifestation of Totalitarianism. Unfortunately too many stupid people seem to think Humanism refers to the ideals that promote the needs of Humanity, this is an incorrect assessment. Humanism is a early Totalitarian philosophy and practice that focuses on anti-humanitarian chauvinism and cultural genocidal assimilation. Humanism rejects both Humanitarianism and Environmentalism, Humanists tend to have what is called a Holier-than-thou expression of self-righteousness. Humanism is an outlook attaching prime importance to human rather than sacred or environmental matters. Humanists are unified by their shared search for Human supremacy over anything sacred or environmental, they assume without any investigation that theology is a result of the search to leave truth and not obedience to orientation. Humanism has two fronts, one is Secular Humanism. Secular humanism is geared more towards Oligarchy and has built in qualities that are self destructive and is geared in the direction of Communism. The other is Religious humanism and it has the very precise purpose of distorting Organized Religion and leading others into the fallacies of Spirituality (Fascism). Religious humanism is fundamentally incompatible with religiosity.
Monarchism
Monarchism is a manifestation of Totalitarianism. Monarchism is the advocacy of the system of Monarchy or monarchical rule. A monarchist is an individual who supports this form of government independent of any specific monarch, whereas one who supports a particular monarch is a royalist. Conversely, the opposition to monarchical rule is referred to as Republicanism. Not every Kingdom can be referred to as a Monarchy because not every King or Queen historically can be considered a Monarch. Monarchism is a distortion of Sovereignty as is Republicanism. Both Totalitarianism and Libertarianism are the distortions of Sovereignty, however Monarchism is the most notorious manifestation of distorted Sovereignty thus Libertarianism is not always as suspect to most Socialists, this is a major yet common mistake.
Corporate Nationalism
Corporate Nationalism is a manifestation of Totalitarianism. Corporate Nationalism is a political ideology which advocates the organization of society by corporate groups, such as agricultural, labor, military, scientific, or guild associations on the basis of their common interests. Corporate Nationalism is mostly based on the contracts of class collaboration between employers, managers and workers as the full body management of government. This is typically justified as allegedly acting as a managed society via social partners in collaboration to create economic policy through cooperation, consultation, negotiation, and compromise. This is where politics trumps economics but not in a way agreeable to Revolutionary Socialists. Corporate Nationalism is not the same thing as Fascism, although it can be said that many Corporate Nationalists consider themselves to be Fascists and that even more Fascists consider themselves to be Corporate Nationalists. The Corporate Nationalists used to refer to their ideology as Corporatism and many still do. But what the Marxist-Leninists call Imperialism is actual Corporatism. What is typically called Corporatism is actually Corporate Nationalism. Corporate Nationalism and Fascism are both manifestations of Spirituality, for this reason it can be hard to see the difference. To make it even worse a person can be both Corporate Nationalist as well as Fascist but this would be more rare, Benito Mussolini is the best example of someone who was both Corporate Nationalist as well as Fascist. Alceste De Ambris and Filippo Marinetti were both Fascists but they were not Corporate Nationalists. Corporate Nationalism is distorted-syndicalism in the form of Nationalism. When Corporate Nationalism is mixed with Fascism it becomes Libertarian instead of Totalitarian. The Libertarian Party (an American Political Party) is a Fascist Party and a Corporate Nationalist Party. Fascism like Corporate Nationalism is Totalitarian, but whenever Corporate Nationalism is mixed with Fascism it becomes Libertarian. Benito Mussolini was a Libertarian not a Totalitarian. This is because when Corporate Nationalism is mixed with Fascism it pollutes the Culture into fanatical Liberation Chauvinism and that Culture is founded upon such a strong Libertarian Nationalism that the Culture is so controlling over the population that they feel a very strong structure of Libertarian values of Spirituality and Secularism. Libertarian Nationalism becomes a Spiritually secular culture and this culture then maintains its libertarian emotionalism by having eternal enemies.
Fascism
Fascism is a manifestation of Totalitarianism. Fascism is Spirituality for Hedonists. The first way to identify the true factors that make up the nature of Fascism is to ignore what Fascists describe as Fascism. Fascism is actually rooted in Anarchism. Alceste De Ambris and Filippo Marinetti both came from Anarchist formations. Fascism has no coherency except for Chauvinist Supremacy. In fact the only correct definition of Fascism is the Spirituality of Chauvinist Supremacy rooted in Idealism.
Nazism
Nazism is a manifestation of Totalitarianism. Nazism is a better way of referring to the oxymoron which is National Socialism. Because there is nothing Socialist about National Socialism it is better to call National Socialism as Nazism. Nazism has five subscripts; Hitlerism, Strasserism, NazBol (National Bolshevism another oxymoron), Nazi Idealism (Reichism) and Neo-Nazism. Nazism is more incoherent than Fascism. Some Nazis try to blend Nazism with Fascism although this is not as likely as merging Corporate Nationalism with Fascism. Hitlerism is inspired by Americanism. Strasserism is inspired by Fascism. NazBol is inspired by Russian Communism under Stalin (more like the image of Stalin) with Hitlerism, this is why the NazBols are the most incoherent of the Nazis. Nazi Idealism is inspired by the Germanic Doctrine of Blood and Soil and Teutonic Mythic White Aryanism. Neo-Nazism is based on Hitlerism and Nazi Idealism. Nazism is Capitalism in denial.
I return you to the prime tangent interruption.
The USSR was Quasi Corporatist, Mao Zedong was correct when he implied this, sadly the Marxian words typically used are Socially Imperialist, he did this because he was a typical Marxist-Leninist. even though he was correct to point out just how bad the USSR became as a Quasi Corporatist country, he was wrong to ally himself with the United States of America. China has never recovered from the betrayal of Mao Zedong.
Currently the People's Republic of China is a Capitalist Country that has become Quasi Corporatist.
Mikhail Gorbachev destroyed the USSR with his retraction of aiding anti-Corporatist Countries, he broke off the Quasi Corporatism by opening up the World to Corporatism. The attempts by Mikhail Gorbachev end Soviet based Quasi Corporatism led to full blown Corporatism ending Socialism thus leading to the even higher Globalism to take the World over.
The collapse of the USSR was ensured by the Capitalist members of the Communist Party
Today Russia is a Capitalist Country which is likely to go Semi Corporatist by aiding Countries that do not want to ally with Globalization, Americanization or Quasi Corporatization.
Mao Zedong was definitely onto something identifying his theory of Three Worlds.
The features of the First World are a Sovereign government. Whose sovereignty is not consistently in question. (these governments almost always have double standard laws.) Mass consumption of leisure production, and huge money over production.
The Third World is the polar opposite of the First World.
Mao utterly failed to identify the Second World. The actual Second World is featured by nomadic diaspora nations. Some prime examples are the Kurds, the Romani Gypsies, the Jewish Nation and the Byzantine Catholic Nation. Notice how the second world is not officially recognized by Communists because the Second World actually consists of groups that exceed boarders.
Though the Kurdish Nation may end up losing its soul by siding with any corporate power in order to gain land – a desperate position they are in due to generations of oppression.
I also must offer the Fourth World, a world that Mao was too foolish to see. The Fourth World is featured by an ethnic group that has been robbed of its identity and usually their ancestral homeland. North American indigenous tribes that have been traditionally labeled as Indians (in the United States referred to as Native Americans, in Canada referred to as First Nations) Palestinians, and Mexicans. Mexicans are called Latino/Hispanic when they are actually native central Americans. So not only do fourth world nations suffer from actual genocide, they also suffer from systematic cultural genocide.
So with these four worlds correctly identified, we can see that the three worlds theory is utterly flawed, short sighted and the production of fantastical another hallucination of the drug we call Communism.
The first solution to the problems of Totalitarianism versus Libertarianism is the rejection of both of these two-dimensional abstract-notions in favor of the more dialectically material one, this being Authoritarianism. Libertarians to some extent pose a far greater threat to a functioning society than Totalitarians. Libertarians don't distinguish between Authoritarianism and Totalitarianism. To make this problem even worse, most Totalitarians don't recognize themselves to even be Totalitarian. One of the greatest offenders is George Orwell, he was a Libertarian Marxist. I don't have much to say about Libertarian Marxism except that it is a oxymoron, Marxism is a very Totalitarian ideology. George Orwell had to have been an agent of British Counterintelligence from the start of his career all the way to his death. The reasons for this are evident, but I am going to point these reasons out anyway because most that read this chapter no doubt lack a functionally accurate dialectical language. George Orwell wrote a masterpiece of fiction titled 1984, this book clearly has a Joseph Stalin parody called Big Brother and a Leon Trotsky parody called Emmanuel Goldstein. In the book 1984 everyone who correctly dissents gets reeducated by the Ministry of Truth, this fictional time and place holds no similarities to the USSR whatsoever. The fictional time and place where Winston lives resembles the trends of the USA during the Army–McCarthy hearings. Even more than this, the fictional time and place where Winston lives resembles the trends of the USA in our time with George W. Bush as Big Brother and the Department of Homeland Security as the Ministry of Truth. Today we have Newspeak in America and the unspoken slogans are:
these slogans bring us to the dangers of Doublethink. Confusing the words Authoritarian and Totalitarian together is part of the Newspeak. COINTELPRO is developing an ability to give Americans Doublethink by undermining their independence and autonomy and by creating an environment of constant fear through propaganda. The Communist Party in Russia during the time of Joseph Stalin was not doing this at all. I am not claiming that the USSR was not Totalitarian, it very much was, but there was no cohesion to this on the part of the Communist Party, it was the Russian masses themselves which collectively enforced Totalitarianism. The Dictatorship of the Proletariat was exactly as its namesake sujests, the Working Class and Peasantry ruled over the Capitalists. The one redeeming factor about Joseph Stalin's regime was that he was in line with what the People of Russia needed but he was also in line with the bigotries of the people of Russia. In those days there was a massive Anti-Cosmopolitanal consciousness which was rooted in a vengeful people lashing out at the marginalized religious minorities in Russia, dismissing them all as separatists via organized religion. Leon Trotsky would not have been any better, actually he would have been worse. Leon Trotsky synthesized Vladimir Lenin with Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, this actually means that Trotskyism is true Marxism. Marxism-Leninism was the Revolutionary theory formulated by Joseph Stalin. Marxism-Leninism does not synthesize Vladimir Lenin with Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Marxism-Leninism reinterprets Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels through the dialectic of Vladimir Lenin according to the perception of Joseph Stalin's theoretical retroactive continuity. Many claim that Marxism-Leninism is destructive because of Joseph Stalin's theoretical retroactive continuity, ironically it is Joseph Stalin's theoretical retroactive continuity that gives Marxists a more accurately Socialist dialectically material in both theory and practice. Marxist-Leninists are better Marxists because they are more Socialist than they are Marxist, the less Marxist a Marxist is the more truly Socialist they tend to become. Trotskyism on the other hand is the purest version of Marxism thus making it counter-revolutionary. The Black Panther Party practiced National-Cultural Autonomy even though it is obvious that they did not recognize that this is what they were doing. Within the ideological framework of Marxism-Leninism is genuine dialectics, this is what gives us the ability to take Marxist-Leninists out of Marxism and into Demarchism. The Black Panther Party was not Totalitarian, it was Authoritarian. Demarchism is also not Totalitarian, it is likewise Authoritarian.
Cosmopolitanality is not Libertarian.
Cosmopolitanality is not Totalitarian.
Cosmopolitanality is a very organic Authoritarian component manifested in Society.
Perhaps I confuse the eager student. So let me break apart some of these barbaric attributions of divinity to pine cones.
The worship of Ares is the worship of war and bloodshed, slaughter and war crimes are therefore justifiable.
The worship of Athena is the idealization of wisdom and warfare. So you worship your own consciousness and its use in battle, therefore the atomic bomb is justifiable.
Zeus killed his own father, and is married to Hera -- his sister. He is also one of the least faithful husbands and also a rapist.
Beyond these obvious examples, Polytheism is rampant with every debauchery known to man, and every depravity conceivable. While a useful teaching tool for scholarly pursuits, ascribing godhood to every facet of nature does little, if anything, to guide or teach human beings to seek any virtue worth pursuing. In fact, one could hardly call any of these practices performed by Polytheists as a religious one, as there are no codefined codes of conduct or righteousness, merely superstitious actions.
It is revealing that more and more polytheists have multi-divinity. It is a mistake to assume every Polytheist engages in Polytheism. However, the question we must ask ourselves is, can we coexist with those who embrace such practices as Polytheism? The answer is unclear, but it is actually Atheism that must be destroyed. Atheists who embrace atheism are dangerous tyrants But first, let me dispel Agnosticism. Agnostics do not pose any threat as people. As for Agnosticism, this is not the threat it once was.
What use do Agnostics have for Agnosticism? None! It is a worthless philosophy. How would one practice Agnosticism? “Hi God! I don’t know if you’re there, and I can’t prove it, but I’m thinking about you!”
Atheism as a philosophy is antithetical to cosmopolitanality. One cannot coexist and cooperate with the very same other whose religion is being bashed and attacked by a malicious proselyte. Not believing in a divinity is very different from trying to destroy, disavow, and defame a religion. I want to be very clear that I am not saying religious institutions should be free of criticism. I have no reservations about people denying there is a divinity. I take issue with and don’t believe that militant Atheism and Atheists who try to destroy and subvert religions in general, have a right to exist. I posit that any form of Atheism is flawed and antagonistic.
If one rejects the idea of divinity, it is their own belief and does not require one to reject religion. After all, having a favorite object is a form of worship. The positions of believers, polytheists, agnostics and atheists are personal convictions based on one’s best logic and cannot be empirically verified. I am not an Atheist because of the foolish philosophy known as Atheism, I am an Atheist because I do not believe divinity exists, for myself the very notion is absurd. Equally absurd is Atheism, a philosophy that no genuine Atheist can accept.
An Atheist in a religious structure is nothing new and in of itself. But Atheism, being a construct of not believing unrestricted and not related to a religion, becomes a system and practice, not merely a belief but an “ism”, that deliberately tries to destroy and uproot religion. It Inherently is anti-religion and is not and should not be allowed to be considered a legitimate form of public practice.
Although Cosmopolitanality stresses recognizance of the other, it is not always tolerant. These things that are not tolerated are not based on any other metric or merit other than what is inherently detrimental to society and Cosmopolitanality. Some prime examples of detrimental actions and beliefs are the defense of or avocation for pedophilia, murder, serial killers, Atheism, exploitation of your fellows, and, of course, Secularism. These things are not to be judged except by Cosmopolitanal Laws.
Those students aiming for Secularism are seeking, in truth, an organic form of Cosmopolitanality, but only if their true motives are not guided or influenced by the "materialistic" corporate sham values, but actual recognition of the other.
It would be remiss to leave out Bohemia from this chapter. The first point I’d like to make is Bohemia and Cosmopolitans are definitely compatible, but to what degree will be a debate to come. The second point I’d like to make is Bohemia, being a small place to forget societal norms completely, might be restricted to protected zones or have some kind of oversight. It is not a debate I could participate in full, but one I must definitely bring up in this chapter. Bohemia never lasts very long, but it never really goes away. Were I a Bohemian, this would be its own chapter, surely.
Cosmopolitanality is NOT Communism.
Cosmopolitanality is NOT Capitalism.
It would make no sense to say Gays, Lesbians and Bisexuals require National Cultural Autonomy. But orientation in the context of religiosity as well as in the context of sexuality requires a level of autonomy, this autonomy is Cosmopolitanality. Cosmopolitanality is the Human Autonomy of all human groups and it exceeds borders. Cosmopolitanality is not something that can be granted through legislation. Cosmopolitanal law is needed right now, today. This is necessary to bring about Socialism. Overall any true Cosmopolitan knows how to express Cosmopolitanality, this worldwide tendency of Demarchism in advocacy for Cosmopolitanality refuses to let Corporatism win the heart of humanity. All observers of Cosmopolitanality due to his or her moral conviction exposes the hypocrisy of Globalism.True freedom is liberty. True liberty is autonomy. The average Cosmopolitan needs to be freed from the bounds of borders. Cosmopolitanal law is the execution of this Social Politic, many of us utilize this without even realizing it. It occurs to me that I can not go further into the necessity of Cosmopolitanal law without going into the subjects that have given rise to it.
First I must go on a tangent on how incorrect Marxian language is.
According to Vladimir Lenin the higher stage of Capitalism is Imperialism. I wonder sometimes why Marxists use such misleading language. The higher stage of Capitalism is Corporatism. Imperialism has existed many times throughout history long before there ever was Capitalism. Socialism existed in past epics but Capitalism never truly existed in the past epics, so referring to Imperialism as a higher stage of Capitalism is misleading. I do not know of any Marxists who theorize an even higher stage of Corporatism (the stage of Capitalism that the Marxists call Imperialism) even though it is evident that there is a higher stage of Corporatism. Benito Amilcare Andrea Mussolini probably coined the word Corporatism on purpose because he understood the treachery he was doing. However what he coined as Corporatism would be better defined as Corporate Nationalism. Corporate Nationalism is a political ideology which advocates the organization of society by corporate groups, such as agricultural, labor, military, scientific, or guild associations on the basis of their common interests. This means that Corporate Nationalism is class collaboration in a totalitarian manifestation.
I just realized I have to now interrupt my tangent interruption with another tangent interruption.
I am going to first explain the difference between the Old World and the New World.
I do this as a Old World person, so understand that those indigenous to the New World do not consider themselves of a New World. The Old World is Africa, Asia and Europe. The New World is the Americas ( North, Central and South America ) and Oceania ( Australia continent ). So now that you know this, you can understand that the Old World Order was the Roman Empire. The New World Order is Americanism. Americanism is a form of Corporatism, not all Corporatism has become Globalism. You will need to remember this during this tangent interruption of a tangent interruption, you will need to still remember this once I return you to that prime tangent interruption.
One of the most dangerous trends that has come upon society as an infection is Libertarianism.
Americanism
Americanism is not just a manifestation of Corporatism. Americanism is also a manifestation of Libertarianism. There are five key features evident to the ideology of Americanism.
#1 The necessity of constant reinvention, attempting to strip away correct identity in favor of false identity. Assimilation is the highest fundamental to Americanists. Americanism requires that all Cultures that come ashore to its frontiers is absorbed by joining into a melting pot that robs organic collectives of their once unique traditions.
#2 Making an aggressive attempt to replace the profoundness of Religion with the meaningless dry amoral attitude of Spirituality. Religion is a barrier to Colonialism, keeping the settler Colonial-Status Quo protected from religious dissent is essential to Americanism.
#3 Anti-Catholicism which in this Century is now Islamophobia. The Catholic Religion stands in contradiction to Freemasonry and Protestantism. The Catholic Religion stands in even greater contradiction to Mormonism which is Americanist Spirituality done in the name of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. Today this Anti-Catholicism has transformed into Islamophobia. Mormonism is a dangerous force that if left unchallenged will inevitably take over the United States of America. The Corporate National Americanist Party could eventually take over the United States of America rather easily, of course if this happens then Americanism will go from Libertarian to Totalitarian, which is the logical conclusion for Americanism. My own painstaking research has led me to the conclusion that half of the National Security Administration is Mormon. It is not too far fetched to believe that through intense manipulation of the Mormons which control the National Security Administration, that the Corporate National Americanist Party could rise as a third Party and overtake the entire Country. Although the Corporate National Americanist Party has never registered as a political party, they may decide that they want to register as a political party that comes as an alternative to the corrupt two party system. With a greater desperation in the United States of America due to any sort of economic crisis it becomes more and more likely that the Corporate National Americanist Party will take over the United States of America.
#4 Americanism is Nationalism. The problem with Nationalism is that it fuses the Nation together with the State. The United States of America since its founding regarded it self as a Nation, with the Hegelian notion of Nationalism, Americanism went from Republicanism to Nationalism. All marginalized Nations imprisoned within the United States thus become oppressed more than before.
#5 Individual pleasure at the expense of collective misery. Americanists love their Apple Pie, Base Ball and Hot Dogs. Individualism destroys the Individual yet it is Collectivism that protects the Individual. Americanism started with William Bradford. The narrative of continuity that starts with Plymouth Rock continuing all the way to Manifest Destiny which is further synthesized by the narrative coming out of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints promotes the Individual right over other Individuals as divine, just and righteous is at the root of Planet Malfunction (Climate Change). All destruction of the truly marginalized in society can be justified by this hyper-individualistic faith in "the self made man" and "doing your own thing" being that this is ordained in such a "Holy Church" of Base Ball where they all sing the hymn of Take Me Out to the Ball Game how is it that America can ever fix it self? The answer is that as long as there is an America, the Earth will be destroyed. Americanism is much to anti-Collectivist to ever allow the Planet to be reforestized. Constitutionalism will inevitably die, because you can not have America without Americanism.
Feminism
Feminism is a manifestation of Libertarianism. Feminism maintains the fallacious position that societies prioritize the male point of view, and that females are treated unfairly within all societies. Feminism is also the Modern reinvention of Matriarchy. Feminism is the most profound manifestation of the reactionary movements that make up the broader category of Libertarianism. The suffragists Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton were some of the most profoundly racist women to have ever lived, it was the White Women with the aid of the Ku Klux Klan that started Feminism to ensure White Women's Rights. Then you have the Neocolonialist idea of Black Feminism which I find to have been one of the weaknesses of the Black Panther Party, a weakness that COINTELPRO surely would have used and probably did. One of the most important properties in Feminism is an agenda for demasculinization of Society. Feminists have always claimed that they want equality, which has never historically been shown. Historically speaking Feminism is about disempowering Men, nothing about this has ever changed.
Anarchism
Anarchism is a manifestation of Libertarianism.
If any of the Anarchists read this they are going to hate me more than they already do. I do not care, I am going to unload reason before I die, so they will either have to ignore me or just deal with how much more I grasp material history than them. A reasonable principled Socialist does not join in the populist whims of claiming that "Anarchy is Order" such statements expose the typical insanity of Libertarian metaphysics. Be warned that what I am referring to has nothing to do with left wing or right wing nor does this have anything to do with centrism.
Totalitarianism is extreme Statism. Libertarianism is extreme individuality to the point of apathy. Libertarianism has been seen before and this is actually what leads to Totalitarianism. Libertarianism allows a individual the freedom to crush another individual's autonomy.
There are many manifestations of Libertarianism. The manifestation of Libertarianism which is most recognized (for what it is) as Libertarianism is Anarchism.
There are four versions of Anarchism, they are:
#1 MutualismMutualism was the first of the Anarchist theories, this theory is Capitalism in denial. Mutualism was founded by Pierre-Joseph Proudhon a famous antisemitic troublemaker. Charles Maurras another very well known antisemitic troublemaker drew inspiration from Pierre-Joseph Proudhon. Pierre-Joseph Proudhon was much worse than Karl Marx in his hatred of the Jews. On the date of December 26, 1847 Pierre-Joseph Proudhon wrote in his Journal:
Jews. Write an article against this race that poisons everything by sticking its nose into everything without ever mixing with any other people. Demand its expulsion from France with the exception of those individuals married to French women. Abolish synagogues and not admit them to any employment. Demand its expulsion Finally, pursue the abolition of this religion. It’s not without cause that the Christians called them deicides. The Jew is the enemy of humankind. They must be sent back to Asia or be exterminated. H. Heine, A. Weill, and others are nothing but secret spies ; Rothschild, Crémieux, Marx, Fould, wicked, bilious, envious, bitter, etc. etc. beings who hate us. The Jew must disappear by steel or by fusion or by expulsion. Tolerate the elderly who no longer have children. Work to be done – What the peoples of the Middle Ages hated instinctively I hate upon reflection and irrevocably. The hatred of the Jew like the hatred of the English should be our first article of political faith. Moreover, the abolition of Judaism will come with the abolition of other religions. Begin by not allocating funds to the clergy and leaving this to religious offerings. – And then, a short while later, abolish the religion.
#2 Collectivist anarchism
Collectivist anarchism, the second theory of Anarchism was started by Mikhail Alexandrovich Bakunin. Mikhail Bakunin was also an antisemitic troublemaker, he even considered Karl Marx to be a Moses of his time. Mikhail Bakunin also considered Marxism to be the Jewish counter-revolutionary force holding back Anarchism. Mikhail Bakunin believed that Jewish hegemony over banking and finance was at the root of the modern ills. No such Jewish hegemony existed, Mikhail Bakunin was not one for facts. Facts mean very little to Anarchists, Mikhail Bakunin is a great example of this.
#3 Anarcho Communism
Anarcho Communism sometimes known as Anarcho Syndicalism is the third Anarchist theory. Pyotr Alexeyevich Kropotkin was the originator of Anarcho Communism. Pyotr Kropotkin was a class collaborator and he had a serious problem with Marxists. It is correct to oppose Marxism, but this must be done without lying. Anarcho Communists themselves have no ability to oppose Marxism honestly. The need for Demarchism is most profound when you see just how dishonest Anarcho Communists are as people.
#4 Anarcho Capitalism
Anarcho Capitalism sometimes known as Voluntaryism is the fourth Anarchist theory. There is no actual main founder of this insane theory of utopianism. In an Anarcho Capitalist society, courts and law enforcement, along with all other security services would be operated by privately funded competitors selected by consumers rather than centrally through "confiscatory" taxation. This living hell would somehow not be a hell because of a universally held doctrine that the Anarcho Capitalists believe in called the Non-Aggressive Principle. The Non-Aggressive Principle is a utopian stance asserting that aggression is inherently wrong. In this context, aggression is defined as initiating or threatening any forceful interference with an individual or their property. Ironically the Non-Aggressive Principle is very Pro-Exploitative. The Non-Aggressive Principle promotes the use of violence against workers that strike against bosses, viewing strikes as Aggression.
Republicanism
Republicanism is a manifestation of Libertarianism. Republicanism is the plutocratic ideology which stands in contrast to Monarchism. Having a Republic as a form of Government does not necessarily mean Republicanism. Republicanism is the ideology of Representative Republic. Republicanism is an aggressive form of Statism that by design is against Democracy. A functioning Democratic Republic does not run on Republicanism. Plutocrats are inherently Libertarian because they understand that Monarchy is a Totalitarian threat to their wealth and influence over society. Democratic Republics contradict Republicanism because Democratic Republic is the only correct transition from Representative Republic to Direct Democracy. Direct Democracy is inherently anti-Libertarian and anti-Totalitarian. Direct Democracy can only be Authoritarian. Republicanism like Communism lacks the capacity to distinguish between Authoritarianism and Totalitarianism.
Minarchism
Minarchism is a manifestation of Libertarianism. Minarchism is a ideology which advocates individual liberties under the rule of law with an emphasis on economic freedom (Capitalism). The best example of this Oligarchic notion is the Confederate States of America. Minarchism is a utopian notion, more so than even Anarchism. Minarchism is dependent on a mix of Colonialism and Free Enterprise. The oppression of such a foolish ideology would be so overt that it would never sustain itself in this Century.
Secularism
Secularism is a manifestation of Libertarianism. Core beliefs of Secularists include new ideas—which depart from tradition. Secularism seeks to "liberate" everyone from religion. This is because the Church was seen as so tyrannical in Europe that it is only "logical" to assume the same is true for the Orthodox Churches and the Muslims. Indeed Muslims and the Eastern Churches must be even more tyrannical because they are not White. Secularism is part of Whiteness, it is one of the most fundamental dangers threatening all of Society. When the Non-Whites embrace Secularism this causes Neocolonialism to flourish.
The other main infection that has come upon society is Totalitarianism.
ZionismZionism is not just a manifestation of Neocolonialism. Zionism is also a manifestation of Totalitarianism. There are five key features evident to the ideology of Zionism. There are also two other sub features of Zionism that bring contradiction to Zionism.
Humanism
Humanism is a manifestation of Totalitarianism. Unfortunately too many stupid people seem to think Humanism refers to the ideals that promote the needs of Humanity, this is an incorrect assessment. Humanism is a early Totalitarian philosophy and practice that focuses on anti-humanitarian chauvinism and cultural genocidal assimilation. Humanism rejects both Humanitarianism and Environmentalism, Humanists tend to have what is called a Holier-than-thou expression of self-righteousness. Humanism is an outlook attaching prime importance to human rather than sacred or environmental matters. Humanists are unified by their shared search for Human supremacy over anything sacred or environmental, they assume without any investigation that theology is a result of the search to leave truth and not obedience to orientation. Humanism has two fronts, one is Secular Humanism. Secular humanism is geared more towards Oligarchy and has built in qualities that are self destructive and is geared in the direction of Communism. The other is Religious humanism and it has the very precise purpose of distorting Organized Religion and leading others into the fallacies of Spirituality (Fascism). Religious humanism is fundamentally incompatible with religiosity.
Monarchism
Monarchism is a manifestation of Totalitarianism. Monarchism is the advocacy of the system of Monarchy or monarchical rule. A monarchist is an individual who supports this form of government independent of any specific monarch, whereas one who supports a particular monarch is a royalist. Conversely, the opposition to monarchical rule is referred to as Republicanism. Not every Kingdom can be referred to as a Monarchy because not every King or Queen historically can be considered a Monarch. Monarchism is a distortion of Sovereignty as is Republicanism. Both Totalitarianism and Libertarianism are the distortions of Sovereignty, however Monarchism is the most notorious manifestation of distorted Sovereignty thus Libertarianism is not always as suspect to most Socialists, this is a major yet common mistake.
Corporate Nationalism
Corporate Nationalism is a manifestation of Totalitarianism. Corporate Nationalism is a political ideology which advocates the organization of society by corporate groups, such as agricultural, labor, military, scientific, or guild associations on the basis of their common interests. Corporate Nationalism is mostly based on the contracts of class collaboration between employers, managers and workers as the full body management of government. This is typically justified as allegedly acting as a managed society via social partners in collaboration to create economic policy through cooperation, consultation, negotiation, and compromise. This is where politics trumps economics but not in a way agreeable to Revolutionary Socialists. Corporate Nationalism is not the same thing as Fascism, although it can be said that many Corporate Nationalists consider themselves to be Fascists and that even more Fascists consider themselves to be Corporate Nationalists. The Corporate Nationalists used to refer to their ideology as Corporatism and many still do. But what the Marxist-Leninists call Imperialism is actual Corporatism. What is typically called Corporatism is actually Corporate Nationalism. Corporate Nationalism and Fascism are both manifestations of Spirituality, for this reason it can be hard to see the difference. To make it even worse a person can be both Corporate Nationalist as well as Fascist but this would be more rare, Benito Mussolini is the best example of someone who was both Corporate Nationalist as well as Fascist. Alceste De Ambris and Filippo Marinetti were both Fascists but they were not Corporate Nationalists. Corporate Nationalism is distorted-syndicalism in the form of Nationalism. When Corporate Nationalism is mixed with Fascism it becomes Libertarian instead of Totalitarian. The Libertarian Party (an American Political Party) is a Fascist Party and a Corporate Nationalist Party. Fascism like Corporate Nationalism is Totalitarian, but whenever Corporate Nationalism is mixed with Fascism it becomes Libertarian. Benito Mussolini was a Libertarian not a Totalitarian. This is because when Corporate Nationalism is mixed with Fascism it pollutes the Culture into fanatical Liberation Chauvinism and that Culture is founded upon such a strong Libertarian Nationalism that the Culture is so controlling over the population that they feel a very strong structure of Libertarian values of Spirituality and Secularism. Libertarian Nationalism becomes a Spiritually secular culture and this culture then maintains its libertarian emotionalism by having eternal enemies.
Fascism
Fascism is a manifestation of Totalitarianism. Fascism is Spirituality for Hedonists. The first way to identify the true factors that make up the nature of Fascism is to ignore what Fascists describe as Fascism. Fascism is actually rooted in Anarchism. Alceste De Ambris and Filippo Marinetti both came from Anarchist formations. Fascism has no coherency except for Chauvinist Supremacy. In fact the only correct definition of Fascism is the Spirituality of Chauvinist Supremacy rooted in Idealism.
Nazism
Nazism is a manifestation of Totalitarianism. Nazism is a better way of referring to the oxymoron which is National Socialism. Because there is nothing Socialist about National Socialism it is better to call National Socialism as Nazism. Nazism has five subscripts; Hitlerism, Strasserism, NazBol (National Bolshevism another oxymoron), Nazi Idealism (Reichism) and Neo-Nazism. Nazism is more incoherent than Fascism. Some Nazis try to blend Nazism with Fascism although this is not as likely as merging Corporate Nationalism with Fascism. Hitlerism is inspired by Americanism. Strasserism is inspired by Fascism. NazBol is inspired by Russian Communism under Stalin (more like the image of Stalin) with Hitlerism, this is why the NazBols are the most incoherent of the Nazis. Nazi Idealism is inspired by the Germanic Doctrine of Blood and Soil and Teutonic Mythic White Aryanism. Neo-Nazism is based on Hitlerism and Nazi Idealism. Nazism is Capitalism in denial.
I return you to the prime tangent interruption.
The USSR was Quasi Corporatist, Mao Zedong was correct when he implied this, sadly the Marxian words typically used are Socially Imperialist, he did this because he was a typical Marxist-Leninist. even though he was correct to point out just how bad the USSR became as a Quasi Corporatist country, he was wrong to ally himself with the United States of America. China has never recovered from the betrayal of Mao Zedong.
Currently the People's Republic of China is a Capitalist Country that has become Quasi Corporatist.
Mikhail Gorbachev destroyed the USSR with his retraction of aiding anti-Corporatist Countries, he broke off the Quasi Corporatism by opening up the World to Corporatism. The attempts by Mikhail Gorbachev end Soviet based Quasi Corporatism led to full blown Corporatism ending Socialism thus leading to the even higher Globalism to take the World over.
The collapse of the USSR was ensured by the Capitalist members of the Communist Party
Today Russia is a Capitalist Country which is likely to go Semi Corporatist by aiding Countries that do not want to ally with Globalization, Americanization or Quasi Corporatization.
Mao Zedong was definitely onto something identifying his theory of Three Worlds.
The features of the First World are a Sovereign government. Whose sovereignty is not consistently in question. (these governments almost always have double standard laws.) Mass consumption of leisure production, and huge money over production.
The Third World is the polar opposite of the First World.
Mao utterly failed to identify the Second World. The actual Second World is featured by nomadic diaspora nations. Some prime examples are the Kurds, the Romani Gypsies, the Jewish Nation and the Byzantine Catholic Nation. Notice how the second world is not officially recognized by Communists because the Second World actually consists of groups that exceed boarders.
Though the Kurdish Nation may end up losing its soul by siding with any corporate power in order to gain land – a desperate position they are in due to generations of oppression.
I also must offer the Fourth World, a world that Mao was too foolish to see. The Fourth World is featured by an ethnic group that has been robbed of its identity and usually their ancestral homeland. North American indigenous tribes that have been traditionally labeled as Indians (in the United States referred to as Native Americans, in Canada referred to as First Nations) Palestinians, and Mexicans. Mexicans are called Latino/Hispanic when they are actually native central Americans. So not only do fourth world nations suffer from actual genocide, they also suffer from systematic cultural genocide.
So with these four worlds correctly identified, we can see that the three worlds theory is utterly flawed, short sighted and the production of fantastical another hallucination of the drug we call Communism.
The first solution to the problems of Totalitarianism versus Libertarianism is the rejection of both of these two-dimensional abstract-notions in favor of the more dialectically material one, this being Authoritarianism. Libertarians to some extent pose a far greater threat to a functioning society than Totalitarians. Libertarians don't distinguish between Authoritarianism and Totalitarianism. To make this problem even worse, most Totalitarians don't recognize themselves to even be Totalitarian. One of the greatest offenders is George Orwell, he was a Libertarian Marxist. I don't have much to say about Libertarian Marxism except that it is a oxymoron, Marxism is a very Totalitarian ideology. George Orwell had to have been an agent of British Counterintelligence from the start of his career all the way to his death. The reasons for this are evident, but I am going to point these reasons out anyway because most that read this chapter no doubt lack a functionally accurate dialectical language. George Orwell wrote a masterpiece of fiction titled 1984, this book clearly has a Joseph Stalin parody called Big Brother and a Leon Trotsky parody called Emmanuel Goldstein. In the book 1984 everyone who correctly dissents gets reeducated by the Ministry of Truth, this fictional time and place holds no similarities to the USSR whatsoever. The fictional time and place where Winston lives resembles the trends of the USA during the Army–McCarthy hearings. Even more than this, the fictional time and place where Winston lives resembles the trends of the USA in our time with George W. Bush as Big Brother and the Department of Homeland Security as the Ministry of Truth. Today we have Newspeak in America and the unspoken slogans are:
War Is Peace
Freedom Is Slavery
Ignorance Is Strength
these slogans bring us to the dangers of Doublethink. Confusing the words Authoritarian and Totalitarian together is part of the Newspeak. COINTELPRO is developing an ability to give Americans Doublethink by undermining their independence and autonomy and by creating an environment of constant fear through propaganda. The Communist Party in Russia during the time of Joseph Stalin was not doing this at all. I am not claiming that the USSR was not Totalitarian, it very much was, but there was no cohesion to this on the part of the Communist Party, it was the Russian masses themselves which collectively enforced Totalitarianism. The Dictatorship of the Proletariat was exactly as its namesake sujests, the Working Class and Peasantry ruled over the Capitalists. The one redeeming factor about Joseph Stalin's regime was that he was in line with what the People of Russia needed but he was also in line with the bigotries of the people of Russia. In those days there was a massive Anti-Cosmopolitanal consciousness which was rooted in a vengeful people lashing out at the marginalized religious minorities in Russia, dismissing them all as separatists via organized religion. Leon Trotsky would not have been any better, actually he would have been worse. Leon Trotsky synthesized Vladimir Lenin with Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, this actually means that Trotskyism is true Marxism. Marxism-Leninism was the Revolutionary theory formulated by Joseph Stalin. Marxism-Leninism does not synthesize Vladimir Lenin with Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Marxism-Leninism reinterprets Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels through the dialectic of Vladimir Lenin according to the perception of Joseph Stalin's theoretical retroactive continuity. Many claim that Marxism-Leninism is destructive because of Joseph Stalin's theoretical retroactive continuity, ironically it is Joseph Stalin's theoretical retroactive continuity that gives Marxists a more accurately Socialist dialectically material in both theory and practice. Marxist-Leninists are better Marxists because they are more Socialist than they are Marxist, the less Marxist a Marxist is the more truly Socialist they tend to become. Trotskyism on the other hand is the purest version of Marxism thus making it counter-revolutionary. The Black Panther Party practiced National-Cultural Autonomy even though it is obvious that they did not recognize that this is what they were doing. Within the ideological framework of Marxism-Leninism is genuine dialectics, this is what gives us the ability to take Marxist-Leninists out of Marxism and into Demarchism. The Black Panther Party was not Totalitarian, it was Authoritarian. Demarchism is also not Totalitarian, it is likewise Authoritarian.
Cosmopolitanality is not Libertarian.
Cosmopolitanality is not Totalitarian.
Cosmopolitanality is a very organic Authoritarian component manifested in Society.
I now return to the primary topic, I would disingenuously apologize for detours but that would be patronizing and wrong of me.
Cosmopolitanality manifested organically as part of the evolution of collective humanity. It is unlikely that humanity ever had a full realization of Cosmopolitanality, the only reason that I recognize the merits of Cosmopolitanality myself is because it is repressed. Cosmopolitanality is not compatible with Polytheism or Atheism. On the matter of Polytheists and Polytheism; the problem is not Polytheists as people because even today there are those that actually believe that their is a multi-collective divinity, this does not necessarily mean that all Polytheists partake in Polytheism. Another factor is that not all systems considered to be Polytheism can truly be called Polytheism. Catholicism and Wicca both get accused of Polytheism, yet this is not accurate. Christianity and Wicca are both Trinitarian, this is not the same thing as Polytheism. Catholicism embraces prayers to Saints, this has led to the accusation that Catholicism is Polytheism, this is a misnomer. Catholicism makes a distinction between prayer and worship. Wicca in its true form is a duridic inspired religion. In the genuine form of Wicca there is the Goddess Trinity; Maiden, Mother and Crone. Just as the Catholics have Mother Mary as someone that intercedes the Wiccans have Lord Pan to intercede. The cultural genocidal war on Wicca has led to Charlatan Fashion Wicca. Fashion Wicca started with Gerald Brosseau Gardner, his rebranded Wicca has made honest research on the topic of Wicca near impossible. Those who still practice Orthodox Wicca usually call their intercessor Lord Pan, they do so because the original Celtic word is becoming forgotten, other names for him tend to be Lord Lucian or Lord Herne. Wiccans use to rely solely on an oral tradition, but in order to fight back against the ongoing cultural genocide they suffer with, some in the Orthodox Wiccan circles have begun writing down their traditions. Just as Catholics pray to Saints not worship, the Orthodox Wiccans pray to gods not worship. Hinduism is not polytheism either, it is a form of Pantheism, from the point of view of Hindus all is God and some being are more pure than others thus the misnomer of their many Gods. Actual Polytheism is reprehensible, yet to assume that all Polytheists are participants of Polytheism is incorrect.Perhaps I confuse the eager student. So let me break apart some of these barbaric attributions of divinity to pine cones.
The worship of Ares is the worship of war and bloodshed, slaughter and war crimes are therefore justifiable.
The worship of Athena is the idealization of wisdom and warfare. So you worship your own consciousness and its use in battle, therefore the atomic bomb is justifiable.
Zeus killed his own father, and is married to Hera -- his sister. He is also one of the least faithful husbands and also a rapist.
Beyond these obvious examples, Polytheism is rampant with every debauchery known to man, and every depravity conceivable. While a useful teaching tool for scholarly pursuits, ascribing godhood to every facet of nature does little, if anything, to guide or teach human beings to seek any virtue worth pursuing. In fact, one could hardly call any of these practices performed by Polytheists as a religious one, as there are no codefined codes of conduct or righteousness, merely superstitious actions.
It is revealing that more and more polytheists have multi-divinity. It is a mistake to assume every Polytheist engages in Polytheism. However, the question we must ask ourselves is, can we coexist with those who embrace such practices as Polytheism? The answer is unclear, but it is actually Atheism that must be destroyed. Atheists who embrace atheism are dangerous tyrants But first, let me dispel Agnosticism. Agnostics do not pose any threat as people. As for Agnosticism, this is not the threat it once was.
What use do Agnostics have for Agnosticism? None! It is a worthless philosophy. How would one practice Agnosticism? “Hi God! I don’t know if you’re there, and I can’t prove it, but I’m thinking about you!”
Atheism as a philosophy is antithetical to cosmopolitanality. One cannot coexist and cooperate with the very same other whose religion is being bashed and attacked by a malicious proselyte. Not believing in a divinity is very different from trying to destroy, disavow, and defame a religion. I want to be very clear that I am not saying religious institutions should be free of criticism. I have no reservations about people denying there is a divinity. I take issue with and don’t believe that militant Atheism and Atheists who try to destroy and subvert religions in general, have a right to exist. I posit that any form of Atheism is flawed and antagonistic.
If one rejects the idea of divinity, it is their own belief and does not require one to reject religion. After all, having a favorite object is a form of worship. The positions of believers, polytheists, agnostics and atheists are personal convictions based on one’s best logic and cannot be empirically verified. I am not an Atheist because of the foolish philosophy known as Atheism, I am an Atheist because I do not believe divinity exists, for myself the very notion is absurd. Equally absurd is Atheism, a philosophy that no genuine Atheist can accept.
An Atheist in a religious structure is nothing new and in of itself. But Atheism, being a construct of not believing unrestricted and not related to a religion, becomes a system and practice, not merely a belief but an “ism”, that deliberately tries to destroy and uproot religion. It Inherently is anti-religion and is not and should not be allowed to be considered a legitimate form of public practice.
Although Cosmopolitanality stresses recognizance of the other, it is not always tolerant. These things that are not tolerated are not based on any other metric or merit other than what is inherently detrimental to society and Cosmopolitanality. Some prime examples of detrimental actions and beliefs are the defense of or avocation for pedophilia, murder, serial killers, Atheism, exploitation of your fellows, and, of course, Secularism. These things are not to be judged except by Cosmopolitanal Laws.
Those students aiming for Secularism are seeking, in truth, an organic form of Cosmopolitanality, but only if their true motives are not guided or influenced by the "materialistic" corporate sham values, but actual recognition of the other.
It would be remiss to leave out Bohemia from this chapter. The first point I’d like to make is Bohemia and Cosmopolitans are definitely compatible, but to what degree will be a debate to come. The second point I’d like to make is Bohemia, being a small place to forget societal norms completely, might be restricted to protected zones or have some kind of oversight. It is not a debate I could participate in full, but one I must definitely bring up in this chapter. Bohemia never lasts very long, but it never really goes away. Were I a Bohemian, this would be its own chapter, surely.
Chapter 6
Chapter 6, Free Trade and Fair Trade.
Free Trade is a economic virtue found in every major religion.
Free Trade also known as Merchant Commerce is the economic policy in which independent trade flourishes this is compatible under several systems primarily Unionism. Free Trade, Fair Trade and Unionism have the most compatibility with Islamic Caliphate, Democratic Federation, Democratic Republic and Direct Democracy. Free Trade must not be confused with Capitalism.
The Free Trade of Merchant Commerce is a policy by which a government does not discriminate against imports or interfere with exports by applying tariffs (to imports) or subsidies (to exports). A free-trade policy does not necessarily imply, however, that a country abandons all control and taxation of imports and exports. According to the law of comparative advantage the policy permits trading partners mutual gains from trade of goods and services. Under a free trade policy, prices are a reflection of true supply and demand, and are the sole determinant of resource allocation. Free Trade differs from other forms of trade policy where the allocation of goods and services among trading countries are determined by artificial prices that may or may not reflect the true nature of supply and demand. These artificial prices are the result of protectionist trade policies, whereby governments intervene in the trade plaza through price restrictions. Such government interventions can increase as well as decrease the cost of goods and services to both consumers and producers. Free Trade is without Debt unlike Capitalism. Free Trade is dependent on everything that is sold or is allowed to be sold to be made by hand of independently at a person's shop, in free trade independent business is important.(certain forms of Socialism prefer for mass production products such as food and house supplies and health care to be free) It’s not surprising that capitalists view free trade in a negative way, after all Capitalism is about profit motive and the pursuit of capital not the Trade of Commerce.
Free Trade and Fair Trade.
Free Trade in modern times can and will degenerate into Capitalism, unless there are heavy restrictions against Capital built into Free Trade. Fair Trade comes when the policy of Free Trade is growing into Monopolistic power in economy. Free Trade is the bartering system evolved into a money equalizer system which still includes bartering. Within the system of Free Trade there is a common commerce equalizer, in antiquity this common commerce equalizer was usually Gold or Silver Coins. Fair Trade is when restrictions are placed upon the Trade of Merchant Commerce to avoid fraud, the weaker economy of a Country, Union or Family is the more the need for Free Trade. The stronger and more closer to Monopolistic economic domination a Country, Union or Family has the greater the need for Fair Trade.
Unions and Small Business. Social Motive to replace Profit Motive.
The issue with Small Business in modern times is that this is Capitalism. Business itself is suspect. We must never forget the issues with the Petite bourgeoisie. The Petite bourgeoisie is dominated by local families and small groupings that wish to succeed in life by liberating themselves in the Capitalist economy. Sometimes the Petite bourgeoisie are for the interests of society and other times the Petite bourgeoisie aspire to become part of the greater Bourgeoisie. During this time of Capitalism especially in the First World, the Small Business is a very mixed condition sometimes to the benefit of society and sometimes to the detriment of society. There should always be local family restaurants for Cultural reasons. At the same time, the End Game to these local family restaurants must be to not sell the food and drink but to have it given freely. However if a member of the Community is going to the local family restaurant on such a consistent basis in one day, then it becomes necessary to charge that person for food and drink. The Social motive cares about that local family restaurant as much as the people the local family restaurant is servicing. The Social Motive is founded upon collective mutuality in the context of survival and prosperity, this is not the Profit Motive and the goal is not Capital growth. The local family restaurant exists in the context of Communitarianism not Unionism. Without Demarchist economic Unions we will never reach a lasting Socialism. Marxist Unions will always see Unions as expendable after their narcissistic goals have been reached and Anarchist Unions will always be greedy to the core.
Free Trade. Fair Trade. Mutual Trade.
Both the systems of Free Trade and Fair Trade must become obsolete after economic growth away from Capitalism is stable. A important question arises about the Third World. Should the Socialists of the Third World compete against Capitalism in order to survive? The answer is, No! Free Trade is very necessary to the Third World but Capitalism is already making the Third World poorer. The Third World will have to compete against the First World but their should be no Capitalist competition within the Third World. The revolutionary Vladimir Lenin was a much better person than the bigoted Karl Marx. Karl Marx maintained that Capitalism was better than Feudalism. Capitalism is not better than Feudalism. It is a more accurate assessment to say that early Capitalism was better than European Feudalism for those that embraced Nationalism. Vladimir Lenin had issues with bringing Socialism to the feudal sides of Russia, he held on to the Idealist positions of Karl Marx and decided that Capitalism had to come to Russia for a short time before they could get to Socialism. Socialism would not encompass all of Russia until the rein of Joseph Stalin. Vladimir Lenin's so-called New Economic Policy was a very unnecessary strategic policy that was dogmatically based in Marxism. Vladimir Lenin was the truest Marxist to have ever lived. The New Economic Policy was a plan to bring State Capitalism to the feudal side of Russia and although this helped with economic growth, this also led to a lot of greedy people plotting against the Communist Party. What should've happened was a housing and irrigation project with a mutually based local Free Trade system for the Peasantry with a Social motive at its core. The New Economic Policy was a policy which lacked foresight on how to anticipate the greed of the Kulaks which managed to get worse rather than subside because of this New Economic Policy under the leadership of Lenin. As it is now, both the First World and the Third World need Free and Fair Trade systems that reject the Profit motive. Demarchists in the First World must compete against Capitalist Corporations, Capitalist Franchises and Capitalist Banks. This will not be done by safeguarding corrupt Trade Unions and greedy Labor Unions. In the First World the only economic Unions that will be able to ensure the soil for Socialism will be mutually federated Cooperatives. There will be no lasting unity in these Cooperatives without the ethics of Religion. So many Communists brag about how they proved that Communism works. These same Communists need to be checked out by professionals in the Mental Health profession because the raw truth is that the Communists never proved the validity of Communism, what the Communists actually proved was the validity of Socialism. The closest we have ever seen as far as Communism goes, was seen in some places in China when Mao Zedong was leading the Communist Party in China. The Communism seen in those few places in China showed us a gender neutral life-style which is non material. Feminism is a Right Wing idea that was embraced by China. Communists utilize Feminism as a way of waging War on the nuclear family. The nuclear family is organic and does not contradict the extended family or the tribal family or the communal family, in antiquity these did not contradict each other in any way. First the Capitalists rendered the family to be nuclear only. Then the Communists lamented the family by declaring that the nuclear family was invented by Capitalists. The truth is that both Capitalists and Communists need to keep their filthy definitions of family out of the organic nature of family. A nuclear family is a family group consisting of two parents and their child or children, this has always been organic. The family has always had layers, always starting with nuclear then extending further in differing ways. In the West there has been an urgency to view all history in a linear fashion. The same is true with hierarchical structures. In the West there is always a panic of a desire to see the structures around themselves as universal, fearing the underlining truth that societies have always been equally alien to each other. The only way out of this Terror is Cooperation and Coexistence. At the same time attempts at the anything goes secular model must end, Capitalists depend on this model and through the false claim of variety they make economic enslavement. This means we need to replace competition with cooperation with each other. In the First World the common people must connect through cooperation and the unity must be Demarchism. The differing Religions and the Irreligious must coexist in Demarchy. There must be formations of society that need to be ended too. In the First world the united common people must compete against the Capitalists. This can not be seen as war. War has losers and winners. This must be a political insurrection overthrowing the illegitimate Capitalist system. There must be no competition between economic Unions. There must be no attempts at seizing the Costumer Service Stares such as Walmart or Target, these Corporations exploit the Third World. We need Eco Socialist Unions that recognize that the Native Americans in the United States of America and the First Nations in Canada have Sovereignty. It is the United States of America, Canada, New Zealand, Australia and the Zionist State which must be overcome first. Palestine has Sovereignty but the Zionist States does not. The Native Americans have Sovereignty but the United States of America does not. The First Nations have Sovereignty but Canada does not. The Aboriginal Peoples have Sovereignty but Australia does not. The Māori have Sovereignty but New Zealand does not. This Fourth World contradiction is the greatest weakness in the First World. We will need to provoke a Back to Europe movement too, it is time to go home. The indigenous need breeding room, this is not up for debate. Decolonization is the first step towards Revolution. As for the Third World, there is no need for Unions to compete with Corporations. The Unions in the Third World must expel the Corporations. It is time to end Capital. It is for us Christians to seek a nonviolent solution, at the same time we have no right to force Muslims, Jews and others to reject the use of force. Non Christians (especially Muslims) who seek to use force may be the only ones with enough respect to both protect us by using force as well as respect our right to organize with nonviolence. We have the capacity to cooperate in such a way that our differences will be accommodating rather than dividing. This cooperation will be opposed by not just Capitalists, it shall be opposed by Communists because the back bone of this unity will most likely be cooperation among Religious Organizations. If there is one thing Communists hate, it is the total rejection of the cultural genocidal policy of assimilation. Marxist-Leninist-Maoists to some extent understand religion has use, but they do not investigate despite their commands they scream at everyone, saying that without investigation their is no right to speak. To this day, I have yet to meet a Maoist who is willing to investigate Confucianism. All the Maoists know how to do is point at the Imperial Confucianism that was used against the Chinese. Doing this is the same as judging Coptic Christians in Egypt for the Spanish Inquisition started by Ferdinand and Isabella. There is more than one manifestation of Confucianism but it is impossible for Maoists to recognize this. It is also impossible to even get Maoists to realize that Manuel Rubén Abimael Guzmán Reynoso persecuted the Indigenous natives of Peru. I will explain in detail what Demarchism is in Chapter 9. For me to get further into the details of Free Trade, Fair Trade and Mutual Trade this will require me to write a Manifesto on the subject. I hope that this Chapter at the very least serves as a introduction to the subject of Merchant Commerce.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)