To understand religiosity we must first understand Orientation. Orientation describes an enduring pattern of behavioral—emotional, cooperative, social, or some combination of these—to someone’s personal identity, there are essentially two kinds of Orientation, Religious Orientation and Sexual Orientation. Today these are both highly threatened by Conformity pushers. Orientation also refers to a person's sense of "personal and social identity, something highly disregarded in Secularism.
Religious Orientation describes an enduring pattern of
—emotional fixed stances, ethics, cultural state of mind or some
combination of these. Religious lifestyle relates to the human soul
and the traditional lessons passed from parent to child or taken up
by the individual's compelled pull to a set of creeds and codes.
Religion differs from private belief in that it has a public aspect
religious Orientation describes a state of being known sometimes as
Religiosity no scientific explanation for religiosity is known.
Sexual Orientation describes an enduring pattern of attraction—emotional, romantic, sexual, or some combination of these—to the opposite sex, the same sex, both, or neither, and the genders that accompany them. By the convention of organized researchers, these attractions are subsumed under heterosexuality, homosexuality, bisexuality, and asexuality. No simple, single cause for sexual orientation has been conclusively demonstrated and it remains an enigma.
Sexual Orientation describes an enduring pattern of attraction—emotional, romantic, sexual, or some combination of these—to the opposite sex, the same sex, both, or neither, and the genders that accompany them. By the convention of organized researchers, these attractions are subsumed under heterosexuality, homosexuality, bisexuality, and asexuality. No simple, single cause for sexual orientation has been conclusively demonstrated and it remains an enigma.
Secularism has proven to be the
single greatest active threat to the very existence of Orientation.
Secularism has promoted to the Abrahamic religions the assumption
that God is against homosexuality, this is mostly done by using the
Abrahamic religious necessity of constant breeding as a way of
promoting homophobia, this is easier to promote than some realize,
think about this and give it time to sink deep in the mind. The Roman
Catholic Church which although a Religious Community was controlled
by an Occult Order known as the Vatican. Ironically the most
fundamental Saints of the Catholic religion such as St. Francis of
Assisi and St. Augustine of Hippo held Virtues that remain
even now diametrically opposed to everything the Vatican stands for.
The Vatican Cult that used the Roman Catholic Church by proxy
expressed a hostility to homosexuals. Secularists by order of the
Corporatocracy have promoted the idea that Abrahamic religion and
sometimes the idea that all religion is extremely homophobic,
likewise Secularists by use of Corporatocracy have convinced several
members of Abrahamic Religion and even in some bizarre cases members
of other Religions that Homosexuals are out to destroy every family
unit. Secularism is clearly the most Corporate inspired of all the
excepted trends of the modern World and it is unquestioned by almost
everyone today, hopefully that is about to change. It is important to
understand that the Irreligious and the Secularists are not the same
people. Irreligiousness is nothing more and nothing less than a lack
of religiosity. Secularism is the material centered life. Secularists
seek a world of justified greed while pretending to be moralistic.
That is why there are no secular Christians or secular Jews there are
only nonobservant Christians and nonobservant Jews.
Atheist Christians exist and Agnostic
Christians exist.
I am an Atheist Christian.
Chris Hedges is openly an Agnostic
Christian.
But is there a such concept as
Christianity Nationality? No!
Byzantine Catholic Nationality on the
other hand exists and so does Armenian Nationality.
Getting back to religiosity; religion
is the glue of society. Religion is the respect for what is sacred.
In essence religion is a state of being and in particular a state of
life bound by monastic vows. This means that many so-called political
convictions are unrealized religious convictions. Anyone who swears
by the United States Declaration of Independence and the United
States Bill of Rights indeed is religious. Religion is sometimes
expressed in Social religion, American Constitutionalism is a Social
religion. Religion is sometimes expressed in Liberal religion,
Academia is a Liberal religion. Religion is sometimes expressed in
Conservative religion, Masculinism is a Conservative religion. There
is nothing wrong with Social religion, Liberal religion or
Conservative religion, on the contrary the beautiful essence of
organized religion only becomes weak and dead when these forces are
taken away from religiosity. The Liberal Church is dead because it
has lost Liberal religion and has thrown away its Academia and
replaced it with neoliberal political correctness. Black Baptist and
Pentecostal Churches are weak and anemic due to a lack of the old
Social religion that was seen in Dr. King and gone are the voices of
dissent that his American Constitutionalist tradition gave the World.
Where is the Conservative religion of Masculinism that we used to see
in the Orthodox Jewish people? It is as if you have to be in
Williamsburg, Brooklyn just to see any trace of the old Conservative
religion of Masculinism that was once so fundamental to Orthodox
Jews.
Humanism is another problem.
Humanism is a philosophy and practice
that focuses on anti-humanitarian Victorianism. In other words it is
an outlook or system of thought attaching prime importance to human
rather than sacred or environmental matters. Humanists do not share a
creed; rather, they are unified by their shared search for Human
supremacy over anything sacred or environmental and by the
understanding that an individual’s theology is a result of that
search and not obedience to orientation. Secular humanism
specifically rejects religiosity and Religious humanism is an
integration of humanist philosophy with an attempt to mix it with
religious rituals and beliefs that center on humanist thought.
Organized religion should reject Religious humanism as a form of
heresy because Religious humanism is fundamentally incompatible with
religiosity. Secular humanism is geared more towards Oligarchy and
has built in qualities that are self destructive and are geared in
the direction of Communism. Communism is fundamentally Anti-Socialist
at its core and the reason for this is that Communism especially as
described by Karl Marx is the disastrous delusion of a Secular
Humanist will.
The need to defend religion is a
growing need today as the Secularists with all their homophobic
neoliberal Capitalism and Darwinism bring us into collective suicide
and cultural indifference.
Noam Chomsky is an Atheist Jew who is
full of Jewishness and Jewishness is the orientation of any Jew.
Jewishness is Jewish religiosity and Jewish religiosity is the
intense drive towards Social Justice this type of drive can only be
worn by a Jewish person. Sure anyone can be driven by a need for
Social Justice but this drive for Social Justice that is intertwined
with the Jewish intellectual tradition is called Jewishness and it's
something only a Jew can have. Jewishness is the religiosity of a
Jew. However religiosity is not the same thing as religious
observance. Anyone who is religiously observant yet lacks religiosity
is by definition a religious hypocrite. Anyone who has religiosity
yet lacks religious observance is simply nonobservant. Religiosity
bleeds through nonobservant Christians as well as nonobservant Jews.
The religiosity of a Christian is called stewardship.
I am an Atheist Christian and rather
nonobservant I don't believe in God or Heaven or Hell. But I believe
that Jesus died for my sins, Jesus was Amadou Diallo who died for me,
crucified by the New York City Police Department. The Lynching of
Black People was Jesus and the crucifixion by the Ku Klux Klan. The
cultural genocide of Native Americans and the robbing of their
religion to satisfy some type of Vatican Spanish imperialism and
White Anglo Saxon Protestant crusade was a crucifixion of Jesus and
this means that heretics of my religion were responsible for
crucifying Jesus. The persecution of Muslims in America because of
the destruction of the World Trade Center that has led to this
Terror-War on Religion is a crucifixion and the Christian humanists
are behind it from what I see joined of course by Zionism and
Capitalism, this is a crucifixion of Jesus. This is happening today
and this popularizing of Islamophobia is a crucifixion of Jesus make
no mistake the Oil that America is taking from Iraq is the blood and
water that flows from the side of Jesus that was made by the spear
that has stabbed him. Jesus dies for my sins everyday and so I must
follow him. I must love my neighbor as my self because that is
stewardship and stewardship is Christian religiosity. There is no
religion without religiosity and religiosity is a matter of
orientation. Sometimes the only way to understand a misunderstood
subject is by showing contrast. My friend Herbert Dillon is
irreligious and he is anti-secular. Herbert and I do not agree on
everything in fact you could say that some of the most touchy
subjects I bring up he will provide imposingly alternative views that
restructure everything I say. Herbert Dillon is a Igtheist and like
me he hates Communism and Capitalism, like me he is a Socialist but
unlike me he holds a grudge against every version of Libertarianism
and unlike me he does not distinguish between Capitalism and
Corporatism. I'm not just an Anti-Communist and an Anti-Capitalist I
am also an Anti-Corporatist so this keeps me and my best friend on
the same level except he sees two evils and I see three evils, we do
see the same evil just in different ways. Herbert Dillon also
believes in conspiracy theories that are unknown to most conspiracy
theorists, Herbert Dillon believes that the world is controlled by
Classic Deists and that modern-Deists are but unwitting members of a
smokescreen. Herbert Dillon believes that there are three post-feudal
ways of politics and I do not.
Herbert believes that
Corporatism/Capitalism is the first post-feudal
way of politics.
He believes that Communism is the second post-feudal way of politics.
He believes that Fascism/Nazism/Corporate Nationalism is the third post-feudal way of politics.
He believes that Communism is the second post-feudal way of politics.
He believes that Fascism/Nazism/Corporate Nationalism is the third post-feudal way of politics.
Herbert renders the words of
Fascism/Nazism/Corporate Nationalism when speaking in a general
context as Social Nationalist Corporatism for umbrella term usage to
describe the many strands of the so-called third post-feudal way of
politics, his term Social Nationalist Corporatism is used by none
that I know of other than himself. I do not believe that these
political ideologies are related so I have no word for such a
concept, Nazism and Corporate Nationalism are two distinct ideologies
and Fascism is a common manifestation of the twentieth century and as
it stands today unless something changes the twenty-first century as
well.
It is very important to remember that
both Herbert Dillon and myself refer to Benito Amilcare Andrea
Mussolini's Corporatism NOT as Corporatism at all rather we call this
theory Corporate Nationalism. Corporate Nationalism is the Theory and
practice of organizing the whole of society into corporate entities
subordinate to the state. According to the theory, employers and
employees would be organized into industrial and professional
corporations serving as organs of political representation and
largely controlling the people and activities within their
jurisdiction. This idea found favor in central Europe after the
French Revolution, but it was not put into practice until Benito
Mussolini came to power in Italy. Many differences can be seen
between Herbert and myself and yet we both hold religion to be
important and we both are against the longevity of Nationalism yet
see it as the only way to destroy Corporatism.
Herbert believes that
Corporatism/Capitalism is the power of the elites who he calls the
Classic Deists or the Deist Corporatocracy as he also calls them.
Herbert also believes that Social
Nationalist Corporatism is the alternative of this Deist
Corporatocracy.
Herbert's most startling and hard to
believe concept is that Communism is the controlled opposition of
the Deist Corporatocracy designed as nothing more than a vacuum to
control all genuine Socialist Revolutionaries so that they never come
close to the Deist Corporatocracy thus insuring that the Bourgeoisie
who are all Classic Deists are never destroyed.
Herbert Dillon's Nationality is Celtic
he identifies as nothing else. Both his mother and father were Welsh
Americans his mother is a Wiccan and his father was Anglo Catholic
but they taught him Celtic Cultural ideas and his ethnicity is
clearly Celtic as well. So even though Herbert may be a citizen of
the United States of America that is not his Nationality his
Nationality is Celtic.
As mentioned in the prologue of this
thesis A Nation is a grouping that may or may not be located on a
country. NATION is defined by religiosity, ethnicity, political
affiliation, cultural awareness or any combination of these. Celtic
nationality is not dependent on British identity or British
sovereignty and there is more than one strand of Celtic nationality
one is Welsh, another Irish and yet another Scottish yet there are
even more strands of Celtic nationality than even these as a matter
of fact a National of Celtic heritage like Herbert might be inclined
to say (as he often does) that Welsh, Irish and Scottish although
part of the greater Celtic family tree are actually descent from
Celtic nationality and that these constitute their own nationalities,
yet if you ask him how a person of Welsh decent like himself is more
of a Celt rather than being Welsh, his reply will be that his
National upbringing was Celtic and he does not identify with the
Welsh yet identifies with the Celtic nation.
Herbert applies his Journalistic
attitude in a Celtic warlike fashion and he hopes that after he dies
that he will be set on logs and have a fiery arrow launched at him
while drifting off to sea, which is more of a Celtic cultural
tradition rather than something Welsh, Irish, or Scottish and this
tradition was kept alive by both Celtic Christians as well as Celtic
Pagans, of course other Nationalities have held this tradition too
not just the Celts but the example is relevant none the less. The
Romanis are a very nomadic Nation and they have no desire for a
homeland and they should not be forced to conform to borders that
threaten their way of life. The Romanis often referred to as Gypsies
are both an Ethnic group and a Cultural group. The Romani nation
exists whether Nationalists recognize the Romani nation or not.
Blacks constitute a Nation as well, my awareness of Nationality as
distinct from Nationalism really began with my time among four
different Black communities all four of these communities knew each
other rather well. Herbert has been in touch with the same Black
communities that I know and I learned a great deal about Romanis from
him and his late wife. She had a very large family many of her family
are indeed friends of mine as well as friends of Herbert. Herbert's
current wife is both Romani and Celtic, learning from her about dual
identity I have seen that one can have more than one Nationality.
From this I was able to recognize that I too have more than one
Nationality.
Herbert has strong Celtic ethnic
bloodlines as well as a strong Celtic cultural identity thus anyone
who might have the audacity to say that he lacks a strong Celtic
nationality is a fool and a moron. Now it is clear that he is
irreligious and yet pro-Religion and that he has Nationality and yet
he is not an Atheist he is an Igtheist. An Igtheist is someone who
requires a definition of God or gods before he or she can say with
any certainty that such a concept exists. Herbert Dillon remains an
Igtheist and irreligious to this day while I remain an Atheist with a
strong Christian identity, therefore it is clear Religion although in
its Orthodox conception is not exclusive to personal belief or
Dogmatic philosophy. Atheism is a Dogmatic philosophy that reaches
beyond the personal belief that the supernatural does not exist. The
Atheist rejects the notion of the supernatural, Atheism on the other
hand is the Dogmatic philosophy of no-god, not all Atheists embrace
Atheism, I'm a Atheist who rejects Atheism as a dangerous philosophy
of Humanism and chauvinism serving the ambitions of Darwinism and
Capitalism. The Agnostic rejects the notion of whether
God or gods can be proven or dis-proven, Agnosticism is the
Dogmatic philosophy that the Agnostic belief is the
truest model for Society. Agnosticism is a dying Dogmatic
philosophy that is being outshouted by the Dogmatic philosophy of
Atheism. Whether the Dogmatic philosophy of Agnosticism ever
gains new popularity or not is not something I can predict however
what I can say is almost every Agnostic today is Jewish, Christian or
Buddhist and most Agnostics today would look at Agnosticism and say
that it's disingenuous.
There is no Religion without
Religiosity and many nonobservant and even nonbelievers are religious
by default because of their Religiosity.
