Chapter 2

Chapter 2, Ethnicity.

Ethnicity is based on two factors, the first and more important factor is common ancestry and the second factor is common geography which at often times this too is important. Ethnicity is the Heredity of bloodlines and a socially defined categorization of identification applying to collectives and individuals of a belonging to a People. The term ethnic is derived from the Greek word ἔθνος ethnos (more precisely, from the adjective ἐθνικός ethnikos, which was loaned into Latin as ethnicus). The inherited English-language term for this concept is folk. Ethnicity is an important means by which people may identify with a larger group. Ethnicity is not Religiosity yet many Ethnic groups may predominantly belong to a Religion, for example the Jewish people are not a Ethnic group yet there exists ethnic groups that are predominantly Jewish. There are many excellent examples of Ethnic groups that have a predominant religion however there are three examples of this that I feel urge to share. The first example I feel necessary to give is the Ashkenazim indeed the Ashkenazim are an Ethnic group that is predominantly Jewish yet not all of the Ashkenazim are Jewish many of the Ashkenazi Men marry Women who are not Jewish yet have offspring through those Women and neglect to raise their Children as Jewish thus not all Ashkenazim are Jewish also take into account that Judaism is a Religion and like any religion anyone can convert although according to everything I know who has credible word to speak about Judaism it is said that Judaism is the hardest religion to convert to however this can be done as a matter of fact most of my Jewish friends are converts to Judaism. The second example I have a urge to mention would undoubtedly be that Mexicans are a ethnic group that is predominately Roman Catholic yet not every Mexican is Roman Catholic as a matter of fact some Mexicans are known to identify as Muslims and it is a well known fact that the Roman Catholic Church has within its membership many ethnic groups. The third example and in my opinion the best example is that Persians (the people of Iran) are an Ethnic group that is predominately Muslim yet not every Persian is a follower of Muslim religion and it is clear that not every Muslim was born from Persian ethnic origin, in fact a large population of the Persians are completely Jewish and a certain percentage of the Persians are Zoroastrians. These three ethnicities however did not arise the same way. The Ashkenazim are a result of Judaism. The Mexicans did not arise as a result of the Roman Catholic religion, the Mexicans are the same people as the Aztec Nation and they used to be predominately a type of polytheist. The Persians did not arise as a result of the Muslim religion, Zoroastrianism used to be the predominate Religion of Iran. The distinction between race and ethnicity is considered highly problematic only because there is a such thing as Ethnicity while there really is no such thing as Race in fact most everyone who referring to race when put into a logical context is usually referring to Ethnicity. Sometimes ethnic groups are subject to prejudicial attitudes and actions by the state or its constituents indeed this is more often than not commonplace in Statism. Ethnic groups in the Continent of Africa number in the hundreds, each generally having their own language or least have their own dialect of a language. African in of it self is a bigger Ethnicity that contains many Sub-ethnic groups likewise Asian in of it self is a bigger Ethnicity that contains many Sub-ethnic groups. Race is a Fantasy based not on Religion but Cultural Misconceptions of the Other and these misconceptions are not always based on Hate or Dislike of the Other as is often assumed although it can be the result thereof. Racialism is the Cultural concept of a Group's desire not to be blended with an outside collective because of misconceptions about bloodline purity due to fear and distrust of outside collectives. Racism is Ultra-Racialism that is to say that Racism is Racialism in its most extreme tendencies. Racism also gives rise to Racial Supremacy and Racial Supremacy has been expressed a lot in the Twentieth Century and sadly is still expressed in this Twenty-first Century.

In the Twentieth Century the Jim Crow Laws of the United States of America represented Racial Supremacy in particular Jim Crow represented White Supremacy in the United States of America.

I am proud to have helped my fellow Byzantine Catholic Nationals establish the revolutionary liberation front known as Byzantine Catholic Nation, I am also very honored and humbled to have assisted my Black National Comrades to establish the revolutionary liberation front known as Black Nation. Byzantine Catholic Nation is in the struggle to help Byzantine Catholics realize that We the Byzantine Catholics constitute a Nation, we need National Cultural Autonomy and it must be understood that not every Nation has an ethnic factor to it. The Byzantine Catholic Nation has no ethnic factor, just as the Jewish Nation has no ethnic factor. Just as the Jewish Nation is based on Culture and Religion the Byzantine Catholic Nation is also based on Culture and Religion. However the Black Nation is based on Culture and Ethnicity. The Black Nation has its ethnicity from mixed African heredity and the shared common ancestry originating from Africa. Ethnicity is the continuation of a people through common ancestry, this applies to the Celts, Mexicans, Spaniards, Blacks, Italians, and Romanis yet this cannot apply to the Jews, Byzantine Catholics, or Hindus it is Nationalism that has managed to confuse what would be self evident. There is no White Nation, yet there is a Black Nation.

Blacks are distinguished from Africans because they are the descendants of the Slaves brought to Europe and the Americas by Colonialists, Black Nationality developed over time going from slavery to the oppression of Jim Crow and Jane Crow laws then to the struggle for liberation that still is ongoing, this has brought about a very interesting Culture. This is how Black is distinguished from African, African Americans can trace their origins to a particular place on the continent of Africa where as Black Americans can not. So this means that Black is a description for those who have the ancestry coming from the African slave trades. White however is just the term that describes eurocentricity, this is why both myself and Herbert identify as European not as White. Those who identify as White identify with eurocentricity whether they realize this or not. Anyone who is Black is born into that Nation, anyone who is White is doing so because of eurocentric Schooling, I denounce Whiteness, I reject White guilt as eurocentric guilt and I denounce White supremacy as eurocentric Racial supremacy and I hope that before I die to do all I can to make reparations to all who have suffered under the Colonialism of The White Lie. White Supremacy is not the only version of Racial Supremacy yet it is the most persistent. In the Twentieth Century the system of Apartheid was enforced in South Africa the political construct of the Apartheid system of South Africa was one of the most horrific displays of White Supremacy. The Apartheid system of South Africa was a White Supremacist policy enforced through legislation by the National Party (NP) governments, who were the ruling party from 1948 to 1994, of South Africa, under which the rights of the majority indigenous inhabitants of South Africa were curtailed and Afrikaner minority rule was maintained. Apartheid was developed after World War II by the Afrikaner-dominated National Party and Broederbond organizations and was practiced also in South West Africa, which was administered by South Africa under a League of Nations mandate (revoked in 1966 via United Nations Resolution 2145), until it gained independence as Namibia in 1990. Apartheid is a word that describes the tyrannical enforcement of Racial Supremacy that is textbook and worthy of Scholarship and the Zionist State of Israel is a perfect example of Apartheid that started in the Twentieth Century and is ongoing here in the Twenty-first Century. The Palestinian/Israeli conflict perfectly fits the profile of the crime of Apartheid. The crime of Apartheid is defined by the 2002 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court as inhumane acts of a character similar to other crimes against humanity "committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime." the definition of Apartheid in it self reinforces this notion for behold . . . Apartheid (Afrikaans pronunciation: [ɐˈpɑːrtɦɛit]; from Afrikaans "the state of being apart") therefore the British inspired domination of Israel's domination over Palestine fits the definition of Apartheid perfectly.

 
Ethnicity is not Race because Race does not exist. Furthermore the Human species that is said to be made in the image of God according to the Christian religion all comes from Noah and I take this to be a moral and just protest against the notion of race. All of the Ethnic groups can be traced to common origin one way or another and so the notion of different races that would suggest that not all humans are really human or that "Their humanity is not authentic." due to deranged beliefs about race is not only pure nonsense it is also immoral and runs contrary to the lessons of Religion as well as the progressive direction that Philosophy is taking in this early part of this Twenty-first Century. The largest ethnic groups in this twenty-first century comprises hundreds of millions of individuals (Han Chinese, Arabs, Bengali people) and the smallest can be limited to a few thousand individuals (numerous indigenous peoples worldwide). Ethnic groupings come under threat most often from Humanism. Indeed the Anti-Humanitarian construct of Humanism is more deadly to Ethnic groups than even the forces of Racial Supremacy. Racial Supremacy holds an obvious danger to any Ethnic group it is geared against however Humanism poses even more danger to Ethnic groups. While many Ethnic groups have suffered and struggled under the oppression of Racial Supremacy this struggle often forms greater unity for Ethnic groups suffering under such oppression and in time such Ethnic groups evolve into a stronger Ethnicity that consequently forms its own Culture and while Ethnicity and Culture are not the same thing a group can be and often is both an Ethnicity and Culture, this is what caused the existence of the Black Nation to emerge on the world scene. If a Group is both Ethnic and Cultural that makes it much stronger. Humanism is a philosophy invented by Europeans. Humanism is also the first construct of Westerndom. Marxism is a Theory of Humanism and so is Corporatism. Humanism is a practice that focuses a sort of anti-humanitarian Victorianism on the World at large. In other words it is a outlook or system of thought attaching prime importance to human centralization rather than the welfare aims of Humanitarianism or matters of mutual cultivation such as Environmentalism. Humanists do not share a creed; rather, they are unified by their shared search for Human elevation and hedonism regardless of negative consequences. Humanism has at its core the assumption that an individual’s theology is a result of that search and not obedience to orientation. Historically, Humanists have roots first in Christendom and second in Atheist Darwinism. Contemporary Humanists are typically atheist,  protestant-christian, deist or agnostic. Humanists maintain views of Populism and relying very little on facts and Humanism typically ignores most notions of Truth. Humanism typically calls for assimilation of all peoples into a Westernized Human Society the most popular form of this is the Marxist Theory yet it is Corporatism that has been attempting this the most by matters of force and subversion, indeed both Marxism and Corporatism seek the downfall of Ethnic groups by these Humanistic strategies and this is not usually done by total elimination although it usually includes some elimination however assimilation through subversion is much more preferred by Humanists. The best way for Ethnic groups to fight against Humanism is to practice Coexistence. By practicing Coexistence we can destroy the Humanist lie of Color-blindness and instead teach the concept of being lovestruck. Ethnic groups must become lovestruck, I Fredrick Danson can not love the Black Man unless he is a proud Black Man nor can a Black Man love me unless he loves the European Man. Loving each other for who we are and how different we are is sacred and this is what it means to be lovestruck. If we can teach this notion of being lovestruck we can therefore bring about the side by side Coexistence of Unity and Diversity and in doing so we just might be able to finally destroy this evil and most dangerous trend of Westerndom that is referred to as none other than Humanism.

Chapter 1

Chapter 1, Religiosity.
To understand religiosity we must first understand Orientation. Orientation describes an enduring pattern of behavioral—emotional, cooperative, social, or some combination of these—to someone’s personal identity, there are essentially two kinds of Orientation, Religious Orientation and Sexual Orientation. Today these are both highly threatened by Conformity pushers. Orientation also refers to a person's sense of "personal and social identity, something highly disregarded in Secularism.

Religious Orientation describes an enduring pattern of —emotional fixed stances, ethics, cultural state of mind or some combination of these. Religious lifestyle relates to the human soul and the traditional lessons passed from parent to child or taken up by the individual's compelled pull to a set of creeds and codes. Religion differs from private belief in that it has a public aspect religious Orientation describes a state of being known sometimes as Religiosity no scientific explanation for religiosity is known.
Sexual Orientation describes an enduring pattern of attraction—emotional, romantic, sexual, or some combination of these—to the opposite sex, the same sex, both, or neither, and the genders that accompany them. By the convention of organized researchers, these attractions are subsumed under heterosexuality, homosexuality, bisexuality, and asexuality. No simple, single cause for sexual orientation has been conclusively demonstrated and it remains an enigma. 

Secularism has proven to be the single greatest active threat to the very existence of Orientation. Secularism has promoted to the Abrahamic religions the assumption that God is against homosexuality, this is mostly done by using the Abrahamic religious necessity of constant breeding as a way of promoting homophobia, this is easier to promote than some realize, think about this and give it time to sink deep in the mind. The Roman Catholic Church which although a Religious Community was controlled by an Occult Order known as the Vatican. Ironically the most fundamental Saints of the Catholic religion such as St. Francis of Assisi and St. Augustine of Hippo held Virtues that remain even now diametrically opposed to everything the Vatican stands for. The Vatican Cult that used the Roman Catholic Church by proxy expressed a hostility to homosexuals. Secularists by order of the Corporatocracy have promoted the idea that Abrahamic religion and sometimes the idea that all religion is extremely homophobic, likewise Secularists by use of Corporatocracy have convinced several members of Abrahamic Religion and even in some bizarre cases members of other Religions that Homosexuals are out to destroy every family unit. Secularism is clearly the most Corporate inspired of all the excepted trends of the modern World and it is unquestioned by almost everyone today, hopefully that is about to change. It is important to understand that the Irreligious and the Secularists are not the same people. Irreligiousness is nothing more and nothing less than a lack of religiosity. Secularism is the material centered life. Secularists seek a world of justified greed while pretending to be moralistic. That is why there are no secular Christians or secular Jews there are only nonobservant Christians and nonobservant Jews.

 

Atheist Christians exist and Agnostic Christians exist.

I am an Atheist Christian.

Chris Hedges is openly an Agnostic Christian.

But is there a such concept as Christianity Nationality? No!

Byzantine Catholic Nationality on the other hand exists and so does Armenian Nationality.

Getting back to religiosity; religion is the glue of society. Religion is the respect for what is sacred. In essence religion is a state of being and in particular a state of life bound by monastic vows. This means that many so-called political convictions are unrealized religious convictions. Anyone who swears by the United States Declaration of Independence and the United States Bill of Rights indeed is religious. Religion is sometimes expressed in Social religion, American Constitutionalism is a Social religion. Religion is sometimes expressed in Liberal religion, Academia is a Liberal religion. Religion is sometimes expressed in Conservative religion, Masculinism is a Conservative religion. There is nothing wrong with Social religion, Liberal religion or Conservative religion, on the contrary the beautiful essence of organized religion only becomes weak and dead when these forces are taken away from religiosity. The Liberal Church is dead because it has lost Liberal religion and has thrown away its Academia and replaced it with neoliberal political correctness. Black Baptist and Pentecostal Churches are weak and anemic due to a lack of the old Social religion that was seen in Dr. King and gone are the voices of dissent that his American Constitutionalist tradition gave the World. Where is the Conservative religion of Masculinism that we used to see in the Orthodox Jewish people? It is as if you have to be in Williamsburg, Brooklyn just to see any trace of the old Conservative religion of Masculinism that was once so fundamental to Orthodox Jews.

Humanism is another problem.

Humanism is a philosophy and practice that focuses on anti-humanitarian Victorianism. In other words it is an outlook or system of thought attaching prime importance to human rather than sacred or environmental matters. Humanists do not share a creed; rather, they are unified by their shared search for Human supremacy over anything sacred or environmental and by the understanding that an individual’s theology is a result of that search and not obedience to orientation. Secular humanism specifically rejects religiosity and Religious humanism is an integration of humanist philosophy with an attempt to mix it with religious rituals and beliefs that center on humanist thought. Organized religion should reject Religious humanism as a form of heresy because Religious humanism is fundamentally incompatible with religiosity. Secular humanism is geared more towards Oligarchy and has built in qualities that are self destructive and are geared in the direction of Communism. Communism is fundamentally Anti-Socialist at its core and the reason for this is that Communism especially as described by Karl Marx is the disastrous delusion of a Secular Humanist will. 

The need to defend religion is a growing need today as the Secularists with all their homophobic neoliberal Capitalism and Darwinism bring us into collective suicide and cultural indifference.

Noam Chomsky is an Atheist Jew who is full of Jewishness and Jewishness is the orientation of any Jew. Jewishness is Jewish religiosity and Jewish religiosity is the intense drive towards Social Justice this type of drive can only be worn by a Jewish person. Sure anyone can be driven by a need for Social Justice but this drive for Social Justice that is intertwined with the Jewish intellectual tradition is called Jewishness and it's something only a Jew can have. Jewishness is the religiosity of a Jew. However religiosity is not the same thing as religious observance. Anyone who is religiously observant yet lacks religiosity is by definition a religious hypocrite. Anyone who has religiosity yet lacks religious observance is simply nonobservant. Religiosity bleeds through nonobservant Christians as well as nonobservant Jews. The religiosity of a Christian is called stewardship.

I am an Atheist Christian and rather nonobservant I don't believe in God or Heaven or Hell. But I believe that Jesus died for my sins, Jesus was Amadou Diallo who died for me, crucified by the New York City Police Department. The Lynching of Black People was Jesus and the crucifixion by the Ku Klux Klan. The cultural genocide of Native Americans and the robbing of their religion to satisfy some type of Vatican Spanish imperialism and White Anglo Saxon Protestant crusade was a crucifixion of Jesus and this means that heretics of my religion were responsible for crucifying Jesus. The persecution of Muslims in America because of the destruction of the World Trade Center that has led to this Terror-War on Religion is a crucifixion and the Christian humanists are behind it from what I see joined of course by Zionism and Capitalism, this is a crucifixion of Jesus. This is happening today and this popularizing of Islamophobia is a crucifixion of Jesus make no mistake the Oil that America is taking from Iraq is the blood and water that flows from the side of Jesus that was made by the spear that has stabbed him. Jesus dies for my sins everyday and so I must follow him. I must love my neighbor as my self because that is stewardship and stewardship is Christian religiosity. There is no religion without religiosity and religiosity is a matter of orientation. Sometimes the only way to understand a misunderstood subject is by showing contrast. My friend Herbert Dillon is irreligious and he is anti-secular. Herbert and I do not agree on everything in fact you could say that some of the most touchy subjects I bring up he will provide imposingly alternative views that restructure everything I say. Herbert Dillon is a Igtheist and like me he hates Communism and Capitalism, like me he is a Socialist but unlike me he holds a grudge against every version of Libertarianism and unlike me he does not distinguish between Capitalism and Corporatism. I'm not just an Anti-Communist and an Anti-Capitalist I am also an Anti-Corporatist so this keeps me and my best friend on the same level except he sees two evils and I see three evils, we do see the same evil just in different ways. Herbert Dillon also believes in conspiracy theories that are unknown to most conspiracy theorists, Herbert Dillon believes that the world is controlled by Classic Deists and that modern-Deists are but unwitting members of a smokescreen. Herbert Dillon believes that there are three post-feudal ways of politics and I do not. 

Herbert believes that Corporatism/Capitalism is the first post-feudal way of politics. 
He believes that Communism is the second post-feudal way of politics. 
He believes that Fascism/Nazism/Corporate Nationalism is the third post-feudal way of politics.  

Herbert renders the words of Fascism/Nazism/Corporate Nationalism when speaking in a general context as Social Nationalist Corporatism for umbrella term usage to describe the many strands of the so-called third post-feudal way of politics, his term Social Nationalist Corporatism is used by none that I know of other than himself. I do not believe that these political ideologies are related so I have no word for such a concept, Nazism and Corporate Nationalism are two distinct ideologies and Fascism is a common manifestation of the twentieth century and as it stands today unless something changes the twenty-first century as well.

 

It is very important to remember that both Herbert Dillon and myself refer to Benito Amilcare Andrea Mussolini's Corporatism NOT as Corporatism at all rather we call this theory Corporate Nationalism. Corporate Nationalism is the Theory and practice of organizing the whole of society into corporate entities subordinate to the state. According to the theory, employers and employees would be organized into industrial and professional corporations serving as organs of political representation and largely controlling the people and activities within their jurisdiction. This idea found favor in central Europe after the French Revolution, but it was not put into practice until Benito Mussolini came to power in Italy. Many differences can be seen between Herbert and myself and yet we both hold religion to be important and we both are against the longevity of Nationalism yet see it as the only way to destroy Corporatism.

Herbert believes that Corporatism/Capitalism is the power of the elites who he calls the Classic Deists or the Deist Corporatocracy as he also calls them.

Herbert also believes that Social Nationalist Corporatism is the alternative of this Deist Corporatocracy.

Herbert's most startling and hard to believe concept is that Communism is the controlled opposition of the Deist Corporatocracy designed as nothing more than a vacuum to control all genuine Socialist Revolutionaries so that they never come close to the Deist Corporatocracy thus insuring that the Bourgeoisie who are all Classic Deists are never destroyed. 

Herbert Dillon's Nationality is Celtic he identifies as nothing else. Both his mother and father were Welsh Americans his mother is a Wiccan and his father was Anglo Catholic but they taught him Celtic Cultural ideas and his ethnicity is clearly Celtic as well. So even though Herbert may be a citizen of the United States of America that is not his Nationality his Nationality is Celtic.

As mentioned in the prologue of this thesis A Nation is a grouping that may or may not be located on a country. NATION is defined by religiosity, ethnicity, political affiliation, cultural awareness or any combination of these. Celtic nationality is not dependent on British identity or British sovereignty and there is more than one strand of Celtic nationality one is Welsh, another Irish and yet another Scottish yet there are even more strands of Celtic nationality than even these as a matter of fact a National of Celtic heritage like Herbert might be inclined to say (as he often does) that Welsh, Irish and Scottish although part of the greater Celtic family tree are actually descent from Celtic nationality and that these constitute their own nationalities, yet if you ask him how a person of Welsh decent like himself is more of a Celt rather than being Welsh, his reply will be that his National upbringing was Celtic and he does not identify with the Welsh yet identifies with the Celtic nation.

Herbert applies his Journalistic attitude in a Celtic warlike fashion and he hopes that after he dies that he will be set on logs and have a fiery arrow launched at him while drifting off to sea, which is more of a Celtic cultural tradition rather than something Welsh, Irish, or Scottish and this tradition was kept alive by both Celtic Christians as well as Celtic Pagans, of course other Nationalities have held this tradition too not just the Celts but the example is relevant none the less. The Romanis are a very nomadic Nation and they have no desire for a homeland and they should not be forced to conform to borders that threaten their way of life. The Romanis often referred to as Gypsies are both an Ethnic group and a Cultural group. The Romani nation exists whether Nationalists recognize the Romani nation or not. Blacks constitute a Nation as well, my awareness of Nationality as distinct from Nationalism really began with my time among four different Black communities all four of these communities knew each other rather well. Herbert has been in touch with the same Black communities that I know and I learned a great deal about Romanis from him and his late wife. She had a very large family many of her family are indeed friends of mine as well as friends of Herbert. Herbert's current wife is both Romani and Celtic, learning from her about dual identity I have seen that one can have more than one Nationality. From this I was able to recognize that I too have more than one Nationality.

Herbert has strong Celtic ethnic bloodlines as well as a strong Celtic cultural identity thus anyone who might have the audacity to say that he lacks a strong Celtic nationality is a fool and a moron. Now it is clear that he is irreligious and yet pro-Religion and that he has Nationality and yet he is not an Atheist he is an Igtheist. An Igtheist is someone who requires a definition of God or gods before he or she can say with any certainty that such a concept exists. Herbert Dillon remains an Igtheist and irreligious to this day while I remain an Atheist with a strong Christian identity, therefore it is clear Religion although in its Orthodox conception is not exclusive to personal belief or Dogmatic philosophy. Atheism is a Dogmatic philosophy that reaches beyond the personal belief that the supernatural does not exist. The Atheist rejects the notion of the supernatural, Atheism on the other hand is the Dogmatic philosophy of no-god, not all Atheists embrace Atheism, I'm a Atheist who rejects Atheism as a dangerous philosophy of Humanism and chauvinism serving the ambitions of Darwinism and Capitalism. The Agnostic rejects the notion of whether God or gods can be proven or dis-proven, Agnosticism is the Dogmatic philosophy that the Agnostic belief is the truest model for Society. Agnosticism is a dying Dogmatic philosophy that is being outshouted by the Dogmatic philosophy of Atheism. Whether the Dogmatic philosophy of Agnosticism ever gains new popularity or not is not something I can predict however what I can say is almost every Agnostic today is Jewish, Christian or Buddhist and most Agnostics today would look at Agnosticism and say that it's disingenuous.

There is no Religion without Religiosity and many nonobservant and even nonbelievers are religious by default because of their Religiosity.

Prologue

National Cultural Autonomy 

By Fredrick Danson.

Prologue to National Cultural Autonomy

My name is Fredrick Danson I was born of a British father and a Russian mother, my father was a Anglo Catholic and my Mother was a Russian Orthodox Christian and as for me I became a Byzantine Catholic at the age of twenty and three. My Nationality is American, Russian and Byzantine Catholic. My citizenship is American so I am not recognized as a Russian and I do not care. I'm a Post-Soviet and a Anti-Communist. My longest lasting relationship was with my boyfriend who was Russian and I miss him very much but in 1999 he died of the A.I.D.S virus and it has passed to me, so if I am to die I will be sure that my knowledge is passed to those who will use it for Generations to come and hopefully those who I inspire shall outdo me. Ever since I was a boy I have been deeply influenced by my mother's Anti-Communism and my father's Anti-Capitalism. I am a Urban Scholar but let me make it clear I owe much to the Academics. I do not believe in the three post-feudal ways of modern politics, these being number one Capitalism, number two Communism, and number three Fascism/Nazism/Corporate Nationalism. I do not expect for the reader to embrace everything I say, I'm confident I will have full disciples as well as critics as well as those who agree with me in part.

National Cultural Autonomy was truly a notion that was originally expressed by the Jewish Labor Bund. To explain National Cultural Autonomy it is necessary to understand what Nationality is.

Nationality is not Nationalism.

Nationality is not the legal relationship between an individual human and a state.

Nationality is the person's National-identity, not State-conformity or State-bound loyalty.

A Nation is NOT a state.

A Nation is a grouping that may or may not be located on a country. NATION is defined by religiosity, ethnicity, political affiliation, cultural awareness or any combination of these. Jewish nationality and Byzantine-Catholic nationality are the most consistent manifestations of Nationality. Nationals typically stand against the prisons of Nationalism and the forced-conformity of Corporatism. Ultimately it is Nationalism that destroys Nations. Corporatism is a threat to Nationality as well, but neither of these are justifiable according to Nationals. A National is not a Nationalist because a National does not consider his or her National-identity to be married to a Nation-state. Nationals typically advocate Nationality. A National should not be confused with a Nationalist because the constructs of Country, State and Nation-state are distinguishable:

 

#1 A Country is a Sovereign land.

#2 A State is defined by a Government's estate of a Country.

#3 A Nation-state(this system is known as Nationalism) is when the State is fused with the Nation, this has been the root of great many of disasters, and thus Orthodox Nationals have a tendency to be nomadic and at times become self-segregated.

Nationality is incompatible with the forces of Marxism, Free Enterprise, Reichism, Anti-Religion, Racism, Zionism, Pan-Arabism, Corporatism, Supremacy, and Fascism. Human Rights are self evident, the right to build and/or preserve a Nation is a Human Right, National preservation is a Human right. Nationality does not pose a threat to genuine Socialism nor does Nationality pose a threat to genuine Free Trade. Nationality is not against all forms of Socialism and Nationality is not against all forms of Patriotism, but it stands against Nationalism and Corporatism. Nationality is the commonality of peoplehood. Nationalism is only one form of Statism another version of Statism would be Imperialism. How can a National survive today at all when what is required is to brake free of the Nationalist-world and at the same time not be destroyed by the Corporatist-world that requires the death of Nationalism in order to ensure Total Corporatism? Can some form of Nationalism that allows independent Autonomy be made in order to ensure the total end of Corporatism? 

If Corporatism is destroyed what will it take to then be rid of Nationalism once it would then no longer be needed? 

This is my Thesis and in this Thesis I seek to explain how to maintain National Cultural Autonomy.